Article

2018-01-28 Home Front: Politix

Ginsburg will not attend Trump's first State of the Union

[The Hill] Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will not be in attendance at President Trump's first State of the Union address on Tuesday.

Ginsburg is scheduled to be at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island for her speaking tour on Tuesday, according to The Associated Press.

While Ginsburg has been critical of Trump in the past, her talk at the university was announced last August.

Ginsburg did not attend Trump's address to Congress last year after attending all eight of former President Obama's addresses.

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas also did not attend Trump's address. It is not abnormal for Supreme Court justices to skip out on the annual presidential addresses.

Late Justice Antony Scalia had not attended a State of the Union since 1997 prior to his death in 2016.

"You just sit there, looking stupid," Scalia once said, according to CNN.

Alito, who famously shook his head and mouthed "not true" after Obama criticized the court in his 2010 State of the Union said after the address he would not attend in the near future, saying he felt "like the proverbial potted plant."

Ginsburg and Trump have clashed in the past.

Posted by Besoeker 2018-01-28 02:25|| || Front Page|| [11134 views ] Top

#1 Ginsburg did not attend Trump's address to Congress last year after attending all eight of former President Obama's addresses.

It's her way of sending a message. An adolescent message, but a message still. Her speaking tour is much more important than applauding the accomplishments of a mere president. The dour old hag will not be missed.

Posted by Besoeker 2018-01-28 02:32|| 2018-01-28 02:32|| Front Page Top

#2 She cannot attend because a house is about to fall on her.

Posted by newc 2018-01-28 03:58|| 2018-01-28 03:58|| Front Page Top

#3 She would have fallen asleep anyway.

Posted by Dale 2018-01-28 05:34|| 2018-01-28 05:34|| Front Page Top

#4 ...There's also the possibility that she is sufficiently ill that she doesn't want to be on national television.

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2018-01-28 07:29|| 2018-01-28 07:29|| Front Page Top

#5 Die already

Posted by Frank G 2018-01-28 08:19|| 2018-01-28 08:19|| Front Page Top

#6 So, she' going to recluse due to conflict of ~~interest~~ bias on any Trump related challenges in the ~~judiciary~~ aristocracy?

Posted by Procopius2k 2018-01-28 08:35|| 2018-01-28 08:35|| Front Page Top

#7 She would have fallen asleep anyway.

One less drool cup needed in the house.

Posted by Raj 2018-01-28 08:54|| 2018-01-28 08:54|| Front Page Top

#8 I guess even maintaining the appearance of impartiality no longer plays well to the base.

Posted by Iblis 2018-01-28 12:57|| 2018-01-28 12:57|| Front Page Top

#9 It only needs a chariot, gold diadem and an imperial purple toga to be the Roman Emperor addressing the Roman Senate. Let's go back to just the sending the letter -- that was adequate for most of the Republic.

Posted by magpie 2018-01-28 13:30|| 2018-01-28 13:30|| Front Page Top

07:41 Procopius2k
07:37 Procopius2k
07:37 Super Hose
07:36 Besoeker
07:35 Besoeker
07:33 Super Hose
07:33 Besoeker
07:32 Super Hose
07:29 Super Hose
07:28 Super Hose
07:26 Besoeker
07:23 badanov
07:09 Besoeker
07:01 Besoeker
06:45 Besoeker
06:43 Richard+Aubrey+
06:38 NN2N1
06:28 Grom the Affective
06:25 Grom the Affective
06:23 Besoeker
06:23 Grom the Affective
06:20 Grom the Affective
06:15 Grom the Affective
06:12 Grom the Affective