Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 05/07/2024 View Mon 05/06/2024 View Sun 05/05/2024 View Sat 05/04/2024 View Fri 05/03/2024 View Thu 05/02/2024 View Wed 05/01/2024
2016-05-12 Home Front: Politix
Five Reasons My Fellow Republicans Should Vote for Hillary Clinton
[BLOGS.WSJ] Andrew Weinstein is CEO of Ridgeback Communications. He was director of media relations for the Dole/Kemp presidential campaign and was deputy press secretary to then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
He was responsible for dumbass ideas, I guess.
Last week John Feehery, a former colleague of mine in the House leadership staff, offered five reasons that he supports Donald Trump and thinks that other Republicans should too. Here, in response, are five reasons Republicans should consider voting for Hillary Clinton.

1. We are Americans first and foremost, not Republicans. Voting for Mr. Trump as a duty of party membership misunderstands the proper role of a political party. Parties exist to represent the interests of their members, not to issue diktats on how to vote, particularly over a candidate anathema to the members’ core beliefs.
Depends on your core beliefs. If it's your core belief that you've voted for "conservative" house and senate candidates for years and watched them cave to the Party of Plunder, then you don't want to do it again because you're tired of being lied to.
A vote is a decision of individual conscience. A vote for president should be determined by judgment of a candidate’s emotional, intellectual, and professional fitness to hold the nation’s highest office. Questions have been raised about Mrs. Clinton’s character and actions, but she has proven herself qualified on all three of these points.
I'd say she's been proven undesirable on each point. Emotionally she's been an enabler of her husband in his serial sexual conquests. Intellectually she's espoused virtually every cause "conservatives" claim to be against: gun control, abortion, you name it. She is the antithesis of a conservative. Professionally? As Secretary of State she was a disaster. As senator from New York she was a chair warmer. In many ways, being a Republican consists of not being a Democrat: the Party of Lincoln as opposed to the Party of Boss Tweed.
2. Donald Trump is neither a conservative nor a Republican. Look at the policy records of Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump, ​and ​you’d be hard-pressed to tell who is the Republican.
But it's easy enough to tell which one's the politician.
Mr. Trump has supported a range of liberal Democratic positions, and he has not adequately explained his reversal on his long-standing positions on universal health care and Second Amendment rights, nor his shifts on abortion. Now that his primary rivals are gone, Mr. Trump’s conservatism-of-convenience is being replaced by more liberal stances on potential tax increases and a minimum-wage hike.
It's the chance we take against the certainty of what we'd get. Devil? Deep blue sea? The writer suggests going with the devil we're familiar with.
3. Presidential respect for the Constitution is critical. Throughout this campaign, Mr. Trump has shown ignorance of and disregard for our nation’s Charters of Freedom. He has questioned the media’s First Amendment rights, claimed power to order the military to break the law, asserted a presidential prerogative to expand the death penalty through executive order, and proposed targeting religious minorities and birthright citizens through databases and deportation, respectively. To “preserve, protect and defend” our Constitution, a president must also understand it.
And to elect a better constitutional course he suggests Hillary Clinton? I'll stick with Trump on the off chance he's got Newt Gingrich as part of his cabinet.
4. There is no viable third option. Politics is the art of the possible, and the possibilities in this contest are Mrs. Clinton or Mr. Trump. This year’s primaries have been dominated by a “Fight Club” electorate, voters who want to blow up the system rather than work within it, but experience matters in a chief executive.
Trump has way more actual executive experience than the Lady of Chappaqua.
As distasteful as a President Hillary Clinton would be to many, the republic will survive four more years with a liberal in the White House, particularly if that liberal president is blocked by a GOP House and Senate filibuster. Mr. Trump, however, is a threat on a different order of magnitude.
The GOP house blockage and senate filibusters haven't appeared over the past eight years. Suddenly they're going to appear like magick with the election of Hillary Clinton with the support of Publican turncoats? I have grave doubts.
5. The best way to save the GOP is a Clinton victory. A Trump win could create an institutional bond between the GOP and the racist demagoguery and proposals Mr. Trump has espoused while simultaneously abandoning the party’s positive messages of inclusion, growth, prosperity, and individual liberty.
That's taking the Dem position that Trump's a racist. He wasn't one before the campaign started. I suspect strongly that he won't be after the election, regardless of which way it goes. The Wonder Bread Mitt Romney was painted as a racist. McCain was painted as a racist lunatic. Bush was painted as a racist incompetent. It's all racist, all the time. Doesn't it ever get old?
​If Republicans rally behind Mr. Trump, the White House is likely to be lost for a generation.
If Trump wins, the party's changed for good -- with a dose of Whiggery added to the mix of conservative and libertarian that are the dominant streams, of which I'd put Trump in the libertarian stream.
Voting for Mrs. Clinton, however, would signal that Republicans will not sacrifice the soul of their party on the altar of an angry authoritarian.
It would usher in four to eight more years of the same poopslide we've been enduring.
A one-time vote for Mrs. Clinton is not an endorsement of her as a person or politician.
Then what is it?
It is a statement that she is the lesser of two evils in a contest in which her opponent threatens the Republican Party and the country.
Some of us regard her as much the greater of two evils.
Posted by Fred 2016-05-12 00:00|| || Front Page|| [37 views ]  Top

#1 The greatest evil in his world is losing access and perceived power. Exactly why Trump and Sanders are such a shock.
Posted by Jort Wittlesbach4106 2016-05-12 00:26||   2016-05-12 00:26|| Front Page Top

#2 This year’s primaries have been dominated by a “Fight Club” electorate, voters who want to blow up the system rather than work within it, but experience matters in a chief executive.

-For more than half of Americans, the current wink-wink agreement between the two parties isn't working, Mr. Weinstein and his political fellow travelers show no sign of helping to fix this (and in fact seem to be profiting handsomely and resistant to changing things), and we have been lied to too many times about commitment to resist inroads from the left.

-The Blue State model is dead. All Democrats are attempting to keep it alive as a zombie because it keeps them in food and shelter and status. The few Republicans who are also doing the same are people like Weinstein. Scratch a #neverTrumper and you'll find - 100% of the time - someone who doesn't give a damn about gun rights and who makes their living either in the government, media, education, or entertainment.

At one time Republicans like him were pro-business. Now they are only pro-BIG business. The rest of us can go to hell, or go work for the other half of the Blue State model, big government. Get it through your head, Mr. Weinstein - your life may have only been inconvenienced by Obama, and will only be inconvenienced by Clinton, but mine has been savaged. Get out of the city more often and see what has happened to your fellow Americans in the heartland.

If you want to see what Weinstein wants in a "leader", look at Gov. Charlie Baker in MA, a fussy bureaucrat with no intention of shrinking the size of government, no intention of rolling back the regulatory leviathan, and who, like Weinstein, doesn't want government shrunk to a size in line with what the founders want. Rather, he agrees with this existence of every alphabet agency clown farm the Democrats ever created, and thinks that "republican" just means someone who can run those clown farms slightly better than Democrats do.

The WWII peace dividend and dirt cheap energy are forty years dead. The socio-economic system that could exist with those conditions is a stinking corpse that Democrats and Republicans like Weinstein think they can keep alive forever.

We are at one of those crossroads in history where things MUST change. The push towards centralization over the past ninety years represents the pendulum swinging all the way in one direction. It must go the other way now or we will die as a nation. If Weinstein can explain to me how Hillary Clinton - along with her two or three SCOTUS appointments who will certainly prevent any reform of the government work force or public pensions and will certainly disarm citizens and will push for centralization as hard if not harder than Obama did and will certainly use regulatory agencies to harm any industry that doesn't give campaign donations to Democrats - will absolutely be better than Trump or anyone else, I'm all ears.

"Fight Club" is appropriate. Those who can't see it are the ones out of touch. Most of us don't work for a "communications company". whatever the hell that is. If you can't understand why people would vote for Trump, or Cruz, or a seasick flounder, before they would vote for Hillary Clinton, you need to do a lot more communication.
Posted by no mo uro 2016-05-12 06:02||   2016-05-12 06:02|| Front Page Top

#3 Air is rare at his lofty level of self importance. Fight club? The contract between the citizenry and their government starts with "We the people..".
Posted by P2Kontheroad 2016-05-12 08:08||   2016-05-12 08:08|| Front Page Top

#4 I'm voting for the seasick flounder, myself.
Posted by Pappy 2016-05-12 10:20||   2016-05-12 10:20|| Front Page Top

#5 Distasteful as it may be, you must prefer the pirate.

https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2016/03/preferring-pirate/
Posted by Capsu78 2016-05-12 10:20||   2016-05-12 10:20|| Front Page Top

#6 In other news, Donald Trump has demoted his proposed Muslim immigration ban to a mere “suggestion.”
Posted by Iblis 2016-05-12 11:32||   2016-05-12 11:32|| Front Page Top

#7 And here's the sixth.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-05-12 12:02||   2016-05-12 12:02|| Front Page Top

#8 What's that old saying the Devil you Know vs the Devil you don't. Well what if the Devil you know is so foul the other option looks significantly better by comparison.

That is this election.

Interesting this guy worked for Newt who is in the Trump camp. Guy has no loyalties or more likely stand for nothing.
Posted by rjschwarz 2016-05-12 15:25||   2016-05-12 15:25|| Front Page Top

#9 I'll go with "stands for nothing more than himself and an uninterrupted gravy train". Rice bowl protectionist.
Posted by Whiskey Mike 2016-05-12 15:41||   2016-05-12 15:41|| Front Page Top

#10 Behind door number 1 there is the most hideous Gorgon ever seen in Greek mythology.

Behind door number 2 is an unknown that probably isn't great.

Which door do you choose?
I'm with rjs, number 2 can't possibly be worse and is probably better.
Posted by AlanC 2016-05-12 18:44||   2016-05-12 18:44|| Front Page Top

#11 Dole/Kemp presidetial campaignn

This should automatically rule out any opinions he has on Presidential Races. Or Political Races. Maybe Foot-Races to out run the tomato's thrown at him.
Posted by Charles 2016-05-12 21:42||   2016-05-12 21:42|| Front Page Top

#12 I hate Trump - I think he is on so many things wrong, and not intellectually or morally fit for the office. These points are a must for any true conservative, pro-life, small government constitutionalist. But Vote for Hillary? No. HELL NO. This is something that would only unprincipled people do. When thinking conservative refuse voting Trump, then why the hell would you agree to voting someone probably worse, or just as bad?
Posted by Omeaper Omerong8897 2016-05-12 22:25||   2016-05-12 22:25|| Front Page Top

#13 Mr Robot anybody?

Young, anti-social computer programmer Elliot works as a cybersecurity engineer during the day, but at night he is a vigilante hacker. He is recruited by the mysterious leader of an underground group of hackers to join their organization. Elliot's task? Help bring down corporate America, including the company he is paid to protect, which presents him with a moral dilemma. Although he works for a corporation, his personal beliefs make it hard to resist the urge to take down the heads of multinational companies that he believes are running -- and ruining -- the world.


Link to Mr Robot shows
Posted by 3dc 2016-05-12 22:55||   2016-05-12 22:55|| Front Page Top

#14 of course they could just vote for Mr Robot:
Fsociety among 2015 presidential candidates
Following the 2016 presidential election has been unavoidable this campaign season. But for fans of Mr. Robot, the race may have just gotten a little more interesting.

According to USA Today, fsociety has been entered into the race, against other new “candidates” including Darth Vader, Yoda, and Bye Felicia. A comprehensive list of who has filed statements of candidacy is on the Federal Election Commission website.

After watching Mr. Robot’s first season, we’re pretty sure that putting a stop to corporate greed would be at the center of fsociety’s campaign strategy. Are you ready to join the fsociety revolution?
Posted by 3dc 2016-05-12 23:02||   2016-05-12 23:02|| Front Page Top

04:36 Frank G
04:28 Whiskey Mike
04:22 Whiskey Mike
01:59 Besoeker
01:41 Grom the Reflective
01:33 Grom the Reflective
01:14 Grom the Reflective
01:07 Grom the Reflective
00:58 Grom the Reflective
00:57 Grom the Reflective
00:50 Grom the Reflective
00:47 Grom the Reflective
00:40 Grom the Reflective
00:35 DarthVader
00:28 Grom the Reflective
00:19 Grom the Reflective









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com