Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 04/18/2024 View Wed 04/17/2024 View Tue 04/16/2024 View Mon 04/15/2024 View Sun 04/14/2024 View Sat 04/13/2024 View Fri 04/12/2024
2016-04-14 -Lurid Crime Tales-
What Does the FBI Have on the Obama Gang?
[CNSNews] For several years we have been seeking records of then President-elect Barack Obama’s interview with two FBI agents and two assistant U.S. attorneys regarding former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, who was sentenced to fourteen years in federal prison for attempting to sell Obama’s vacated Senate seat.

Our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests were rejected, and so we have now filed a lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No 1:16-cv-00576)) against the U.S. Department of Justice in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking the FBI interview records of Obama, Rahm Emanuel, and Valerie Jarrett.

The FBI denied our June 1, 2011, FOIA request seeking:
  • Records of FBI interviews with Barack Obama concerning or relating to Rod Blagojevich, including but not limited to notes, summaries, and recordings of the interview.
  • Records of FBI interviews with Rahm Emanuel concerning or relating to Rod Blagojevich, including but not limited to notes, summaries, and recordings of the interview.
  • Records of FBI interviews with Valerie Jarrett concerning or relating to Rod Blagojevich, including but not limited to notes, summaries, and recordings of the interview.
  • Records concerning any of the aforementioned interviews with Barack Obama, Rahm Emanuel, or Valerie Jarrett.


  • The FBI contends the release of these records "could reasonably be expected" to interfere with law enforcement proceedings and withheld them under Exemption 7 (which allows agency to withhold certain law enforcement records).

    Here is the background:

    On December 18, 2008, about a week after Blagojevich’s arrest, then-President-elect Barack Obama was questioned at his Chicago transition office about the scandal surrounding the alleged sale of the Senate seat he vacated in 2008. We are seeking the FBI summaries from this interview.

    In January 2009, we released documents from the office of then-Governor Rod Blagojevich related to Blagojevich’s contacts with President-elect Obama and his transition team. The documents include a December 3, 2008, letter from Barack Obama following his December 2, 2008, meeting with Blagojevich, as well as a November 17, 2008, letter signed by Presidential Transition Team co-chairs Valerie Jarrett and John Podesta, providing Blagojevich with a list of transition team contacts. These documents tend to undermine Obama’s claims that he had no contact with Blagojevich.

    Blagojevich was convicted on 17 of the 20 public corruption charges against him, some of which have been vacated. He is not scheduled for release until 2024. The Supreme Court has refused to hear his appeal on the 13 remaining corruption charges. A federal judge has scheduled Blagojevich to be resentenced on June 30, 2016.

    Writing in The Washington Examiner, Rudy Takala noted, "There are no enforcement proceedings related to the case known to be pending, leading critics to charge that the agency's denial is politically motivated."

    Well, yes. This lawsuit highlights the personal corruption issues of Barack Obama. He and his closest aides were interviewed by the FBI in a criminal investigation, and his administration doesn’t want Americans to have the details. The Chicago way shouldn’t trump the American people’s right to know.

    It won’t if we have anything to do with it.

    Until next week ...
    Posted by Besoeker 2016-04-14 07:50|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

    #1 And there is another issue: Obama was president-elect, and thus would become the FBI's boss-of-bosses: did the fact that Obama could be able to punish the ones interviewing him have anything to do with there being no enforcement proceedings in the first place? Nixon was nailed because he was accused of using the power of his office and the agencies under him to affect an election that would have political consequences and thus was politically motivated. Why should Obama be exempt from the same accusation?

    Finally, the job of preventing political corruption, and thus creating political implications of wrongdoing in one party clearly rests with the opposition, since we would be fools to believe that a political party would police itself and air its own political dirty laundry.

    You Dems demand that we "do our jobs". Oh, we'll do our jobs all right. More than you can stand or handle!

    Posted by ptah 2016-04-14 08:33||   2016-04-14 08:33|| Front Page Top

    #2 I dunno, ptah. Republicans these days don't seem to be doing much of anything except shooting themselves in their feet.
    Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2016-04-14 11:50||   2016-04-14 11:50|| Front Page Top

    05:48 NN2N1
    05:33 NN2N1
    05:25 NN2N1
    05:23 Grom the Reflective
    05:20 Grom the Reflective
    05:17 Grom the Reflective
    05:11 Grom the Reflective
    05:01 Grom the Reflective
    04:59 Grom the Reflective
    04:53 Gloluns Turkeyneck4904
    04:26 Uleremp and Company7042
    02:32 Grom the Reflective
    02:20 Besoeker
    02:12 Besoeker
    02:01 Besoeker
    01:44 Besoeker
    01:44 DarthVader
    01:39 Besoeker
    01:37 DarthVader
    01:28 Grom the Reflective
    01:16 Besoeker
    00:05 Uleremp and Company7042









    Paypal:
    Google
    Search WWW Search rantburg.com