Article

2016-03-01 Home Front: Politix

The betting markets on the American primary elections show an 87% probability that Hillary Clinton will head the Democratic ticket and a 76% probability that Donald Trump will lead the Republicans. Between the two, Trump is the pro-Israel candidate. First, his daughter Ivanka is an observant Orthodox Jew after her conversion and marriage to Jared Kushner, the scion of a prominent family of Jewisih philanthropists. Second, and most decisive, Trump feels no obligation to win favor among Muslims, proposing a temporary ban against any Muslim entering the United States. Hillary Clinton, by contrast, surrounded herself with advisers openly hostile to Israel and pondered covert funding for Palestinian civil disobedience to pressure the Israeli government.

Rarely have Americans had such a clear choice between pro-Israel and not-so-pro-Israel candidates. Remarkably, the neo-conservatives prefer Hillary Clinton. That should confuse the conspiracy theorists. A Google search produces 400,000 hits for the search terms "neoconservative" and "Zionist." Yet the leading neoconservatives say they won't vote for Trump under any circumstances, and one prominent neocon, Robert Kagan, has already declared for Hillary against Trump. Bill Kristol, the editor of the Weekly Standard and head of the Emergency Committee for Israel, has declared that he would never vote for Trump under any circumstances

...Remarkably, Kristol's Emergency Committee for Israel is running a TV ad denouncing Trump for "kissing up to anti-American dictators"--an unusual use of funds by an organization founded to support Israel rather than support particular candidates, and especially unusual when it is directed against a pro-Israel candidate. Trump notoriously has said that America could work with Russia's Vladimir Putin against terrorists, and argued that toppling Saddam Hussein and Muammar Qaddafi benefited the terrorists. One cannot quite say that Trump paints with a broad brush; rather, he throws the bucket of paint against the wall. But the neo-conservatives' defining dogma is to undermine dictators and promote democracy. Trump's view is closer to that of the Israeli consensus. Israel is pragmatic, generally preferring the Arab dictatorships to the chaos that replaced them. Israel's relations with Russia are complex but generally good, especially in operational matters in Syria.

For the most part, Trump is exactly correct. The Libyan adventure, backed vociferously by the neo-conservatives as well as the Obama Administration, turned Libya into a Petrie dish for terrorists. Imposing Shia majority rule in Iraq under the Bush administration turned Iraq into an Iranian satrapy. Overthrowing Saddam Hussein as such was not the problem; marginalizing Iraq's Sunnis prepared the ground for ISIS. Russia has far more to worry about from Islamic terrorism than the United States, and in theory might cooperate with Washington even while opposing US interests in other spheres.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-03-01 16:04|| || Front Page|| [11132 views ] Top

#1 The Donald is the only junkyard dog mean enough to take on Hillary head to head.

No polite BS like past Republican candidates. Hillary is a piece of work so it takes a potential a-hole to drive her right over the cliff.

Posted by 3dc 2016-03-01 16:47|| 2016-03-01 16:47|| Front Page Top

#2 Good article g. Yawn on response.

Posted by Dale 2016-03-01 18:33|| 2016-03-01 18:33|| Front Page Top

#3 Trump will lose - the press will dredge deep into his very questionable past and dump on him far worse than any GOP candidate to date. It will be constant spin, and Trump has given plenty to spin with his arrogance and stupidity. The dirt is there. You have been warned. By the time you wake up it will be too late to apologize to the majority of GOP voters who voted for someone other than Trump, the irreparable damage will be done. Get ready for Hillary - unlike those of us against trump, you will deserve your misery.

Posted by Voldemort Pelosi1060 2016-03-01 19:06|| 2016-03-01 19:06|| Front Page Top

#4 Oh thank you, Courageous One! With an anonymous nym

Posted by Frank G 2016-03-01 19:13|| 2016-03-01 19:13|| Front Page Top

#5 At #3.

If he comes under attack by the press it will certainly be a turn-around. They've been covering his every move at no cost up to this point.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-03-01 19:35|| 2016-03-01 19:35|| Front Page Top

#6 I'm not a Trumpalo, but he's managed to turn every MSM/DNC move back against them. If they attack him, he'll say: "They want a Democrat or a person THEY can control" and it will work, because people are so f*cking tired of being lied to, what's one more, if he attacks the previous liars?

Posted by Frank G 2016-03-01 19:39|| 2016-03-01 19:39|| Front Page Top

#7 When institutions, cultural elites, and political power have turned against the vast majority of the populace that does a large part of working to support the rest, you are setting the stage for cultural, if not political upheaval. We'll be lucky if it doesn't come to shooting in a couple decades

Posted by Frank G 2016-03-01 19:42|| 2016-03-01 19:42|| Front Page Top

#8 Decades?

Posted by Procopius2k 2016-03-01 20:15|| 2016-03-01 20:15|| Front Page Top

#9 I was being generous

Posted by Frank G 2016-03-01 20:26|| 2016-03-01 20:26|| Front Page Top

14:09 Grom the Affective
14:04 Super Hose
14:02 Super Hose
13:37 Procopius2k
13:35 Grom the Affective
13:34 Procopius2k
13:27 Grom the Affective
13:21 NN2N1
13:18 Grom the Affective
12:50 Remoteman
12:45 Secret Master
12:24 Matt
12:07 Abu Uluque
12:03 Grom the Affective
11:59 Grom the Affective
11:35 Super Hose
11:33 Super Hose
11:29 Besoeker
11:28 Besoeker
11:28 Super Hose
11:27 Besoeker
11:23 Besoeker
11:22 Grom the Affective
11:20 Super Hose