Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 04/26/2024 View Thu 04/25/2024 View Wed 04/24/2024 View Tue 04/23/2024 View Mon 04/22/2024 View Sun 04/21/2024 View Sat 04/20/2024
2016-01-26 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
The Myth of an Anti-ISIS Grand Coalition
This second report defines American strategic objectives in Iraq and Syria, identify the minimum necessary conditions for ending the conflicts there, and compare U.S. objectives with those of Iran, Russia, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia in order to understand actual convergences and divergences. The differences mean that the U.S. cannot rely heavily on international partners to achieve its objectives. Subsequent reports will provide a detailed assessment of the situation on the ground in Syria and present the planning group's evaluation of several courses of action.

The key findings of this second report are:

  • The U.S. must accomplish four strategic objectives in Iraq and Syria to achieve vital national interests and secure its people: 1) destroy enemy groups; 2) end the communal, sectarian civil wars;
    Good luck with that
    3) set conditions to prevent the reconstitution of enemy groups; and 4) extricate Iraq and Syria from regional and global conflicts.
  • Any American strategy must take urgent measures to strengthen Iraqi Prime Minister Abadi and prepare contingency efforts for his fall. The collapse of the Abadi government and return of his predecessor Nuri al Maliki would be disastrous for the fight against ISIS.
    Need the Sunni tribes, check
  • Ongoing international negotiations within the Vienna Framework are bypassing essential requirements for long-term success in Syria. Re-establishing a stable, unitary Syrian state that secures American interests requires the U.S. and its partners to 1) destroy ISIS, Jabhat al Nusra, and foreign Salafi-jihadi groups in Syria; 2) identify and strengthen interlocutors representing the Syrian opposition; 3) facilitate a negotiated settlement between the Syrian regime and opposition; 4) obtain regional acceptance of that settlement; 5) establish peace-enforcement mechanisms; and 6) reconstruct state institutions.
    I.e. the un-Obama strategy.
  • The Salafi-jihadi militant base in Syria poses a threat to the U.S., but the U.S. must not simply attack it because that would put the U.S. at war with many Sunnis who must be incorporated into a future, post-Assad inclusive government.
    Iran?
  • The U.S. must separate reconcilable from irreconcilable elements.
    And now for my next magic trick
    These other Salafi-jihadi groups must meet the following conditions essential for core U.S. security objectives in order to participate: break with Jabhat al Nusra and ISIS; accept the principle of a future pluralistic and unitary Syrian state; reject violent jihad; commit to disarming to a policing and defensive level; and commit to the elimination of the current shari'a court system and the establishment of political institution-based governance.
  • The superficial convergence of Iranian, Russian, Turkish, and Saudi strategic objectives with those of the U.S. on ISIS as a threat masks significant divergences that will undermine U.S. security requirements. Iran
    , Obama
    and Russia both seek to reduce and eliminate U.S. influence in the Middle East and are not pursuing strategies that will ultimately defeat al Qaeda and ISIS in Syria or Iraq. Turkey's support for the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist groups, some linked to al Qaeda, stem from the ruling party's intent to reestablish itself as an independent, Muslim, regional power. Finally, Saudi Arabia's objectives remain shaped by perceived existential threats from Iran and a growing succession crisis, causing key divergences, especially over support to Salafi-jihadi groups. The U.S. must lead efforts to resolve the crisis in Syria and cannot outsource them to partners.
Posted by Sven the pelter 2016-01-26 00:00|| || Front Page|| [7 views ]  Top
 File under: Islamic State 

#1 Is it just me, or the more USA interferes the worse things become?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-01-26 03:01||   2016-01-26 03:01|| Front Page Top

#2 No, it's not just you. It's an axiom of both U.S. diplomacy and of stirring cow pies.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-01-26 03:09||   2016-01-26 03:09|| Front Page Top

#3 Unwaveringly, anything 0bean touches turns to $hit.
Posted by gorb 2016-01-26 03:16||   2016-01-26 03:16|| Front Page Top

#4 didn't start with O, gorb
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-01-26 13:33||   2016-01-26 13:33|| Front Page Top

14:54 Uleremp and Company7042
14:42 Grom the Reflective
14:42 Uleremp and Company7042
14:41 swksvolFF
14:41 Airandee
14:38 Uleremp and Company7042
14:31 Uleremp and Company7042
14:29 Uleremp and Company7042
14:27 Uleremp and Company7042
14:25 SteveS
14:19 Omomomble Glusoter5572
14:18 swksvolFF
14:14 NoMoreBS
14:11 Skidmark
14:06 Skidmark
13:59 swksvolFF
13:55 Skidmark
13:55 swksvolFF
13:52 Skidmark
13:41 Skidmark
13:38 Uleremp and Company7042
13:36 Skidmark
13:33 Uleremp and Company7042
13:28 NoMoreBS









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com