|
2015-03-24 Israel-Palestine-Jordan
|
|
Top White House official calls for end to ’50-year occupation’
|
WASHINGTON -- White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough called for the end of Israel’s “50-year occupation” and doubled down on the Obama administration’s critique of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a warmly received speech to the lobbying group J Street in Washington Monday.
Speaking to the dovish group’s
| Really? "Dovish" then is the new synonym for "surrender monkey"... |
national conference, McDonough became the latest in a series of Washington officials to highlight the administration’s displeasure with Netanyahu, while also talking up the permanence of US-Israel ties, repeating Washington’s commitment to continued military, security and intelligence cooperation.
“No matter who leads Israel, America’s commitment to Israel’s security will never waiver,” McDonough said.
At the same time,
| ...he then walks back everything he said... |
McDonough said later, “an occupation that has lasted for 50 years must end,” referring to Israel’s 48-year hold on the West Bank.
| Which started from a little war that Mr. McDonough doesn't know anything about... |
The statement represented an unusually harsh and completely expected given recent events repudiation of Israel’s control over the Palestinian territories, using a term the administration generally avoids.
The longtime confidant to US President Barack Obama said that the administration believes that “the best way to safeguard Israel’s long-term security is to bring about a comprehensive peace between Israelis and Palestinians.”
| The Paleos don't want peace. That's why Bibi isn't able to negotiate one. |
Washington, he said, “has long advocated direct negotiations” toward a two-state solution — a position, he noted, that Netanyahu embraced in his 2009 speech at Bar-Ilan University.
“That’s why the prime minister’s comments on the eve of the election, [which] made very clear that a Palestinian state will not be established while he is prime minister, were so very troubling,” McDonough said, referring to comments made by Netanyahu in a preelection interview with the NRG website in which he seemed to take a Palestinian state off the table.
McDonough rejected Netanyahu’s claims that he had not changed his position, as well as Netanyahu’s explanation that conditions in the Middle East must be more stable for a Palestinian state to be established.
“We cannot simply pretend that these comments were never made,” McDonough proclaimed, receiving a standing ovation from the 3,000-person audience.
| Bibi made clear that he can't negotiate peace with people who don't want peace. That apparently is beyond the comprehension of J Street... |
McDonough did not, however, address the first precondition that Netanyahu stipulated earlier this week for Palestinian statehood — that the Palestinian Authority renounce its nearly year-old alliance with Hamas.
McDonough denied that the basis of the current low in US-Israel relations was based upon bad personal chemistry between Obama and Netanyahu.
“Nothing could be further from the truth,” he said, arguing instead that it stems from the fact that “America’s commitment to a failed two-state solution is fundamental to American foreign policy.
“We will look to the next Israeli government to match words with action and to policies that demonstrates a commitment to a two-state solution,” McDonough continued.
| Recall the definition of 'insanity'... |
“In the end, we know what a peace agreement should look like. The borders of Israel and an independent Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps. Each state needs secure and recognized borders, and there must be robust provisions that safeguard Israel’s security.”
| Any Paleo leader who agrees to that is dead. His own bodyguards will kill him. Even the ineffectual Mahmoud Abbas knows this. Why doesn't Mr. McDonough? |
As the deadline for a political framework agreement with Iran approaches at the end of the month, McDonough said that “diplomatic engagement with Iran has already delivered concrete results. Through the Joint Plan of Action, we’ve succeeded in stopping the advance of Iran’s nuclear program and even rolling it back in key areas.”
He reiterated the terms for an agreement that the US National Security Advisor stated earlier this month during the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s conference — that Iran would not be able to develop weapons-grade plutonium or to use its underground site at Fordow to enrich uranium; extend the amount of time it would take Iran to reach breakout capacity; and would establish “frequent and intrusive inspection” to prevent Iran from pursuing a nuclear weapon through a covert channel.
The White House chief of staff stressed that “the deal we are pursuing is both realistic and achievable. A scenario where Iran forgoes domestic enrichment capacity for all time would surely be ideal, but it’s not grounded in reality.”
| Not your reality, but Bibi's reality is a little different... |
“The bottom line is this: Compared to the alternatives, diplomacy offers the best and most effective way to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, and this is our best shot at diplomacy. We have to give diplomacy a chance to succeed,” McDonough added.
| Mr. McDonough clearly is a surrender monkey. As long as he gets what he wants he'll write off the entire Middle East... |
He had choice words for the 47 senators who, earlier this month, wrote a letter to Iran’s leaders warning that any deal signed without the consent of Congress was liable to be impermanent. “It was a blatant political move — as the president said, that is not how America does its business,” McDonough complained. “The letter was also critically flawed in its legal reasoning. We are pursuing a political arrangement with Iran that does not require congressional approval. Such deals are an essential, long-standing element of international diplomacy. Republican and Democratic presidents alike have relied on them.”
| But it's okay when Democratic Senators interfere with the plans of Republican presidents. You could ask them, it's entirely different. |
McDonough warned that legislation, such as the bill coauthored by Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) and Robert Menendez (D-NJ) that would require Congress to vote on any deal, “would embolden hard-liners in Iran. It would separate the United States from our allies. And it would potentially fracture the international unity that has been essential to keeping the pressure on Iran.
| See the Constitution, Article II, Section 2, on the power of the Senate with regard to treaties. I think you folks need the reminder... |
“A good deal,” McDonuogh assured, “is the best way to reach our shared goal — preventing Iran from gaining a nuclear weapon.”
Acknowledging that “even if a nuclear deal is reached, our concerns about Iran’s behavior in the region and around the world will endure,” McDonough insisted that “to walk away from the opportunity to diplomatically and peacefully resolve one of the greatest threats to international security would not strengthen our hand to stop Iran’s destabilizing actions.” 
|
Posted by Steve White 2015-03-24 08:26||
||
Front Page|| [3 views ]
Top
|
|
Posted by DarthVader 2015-03-24 08:41||
2015-03-24 08:41||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by gorb 2015-03-24 10:15||
2015-03-24 10:15||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by airandee 2015-03-24 11:17||
2015-03-24 11:17||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Procopius2k 2015-03-24 12:22||
2015-03-24 12:22||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Goober Ebbaviting9554 2015-03-24 14:27||
2015-03-24 14:27||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Besoeker 2015-03-24 15:30||
2015-03-24 15:30||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by 3dc 2015-03-24 17:29||
2015-03-24 17:29||
Front Page
Top
|
|
20:24 European Conservative
19:50 trailing wife
19:48 Frank G
19:39 trailing wife
18:40 3dc
18:39 3dc
18:38 3dc
18:36 3dc
18:35 3dc
18:33 3dc
18:23 DooDahMan
18:21 DooDahMan
18:16 3dc
17:57 Huputle+Cherelet4131
17:53 SteveS
17:52 SteveS
17:49 lord garth
17:26 trailing wife
17:21 M. Murcek
17:17 lord garth
17:03 trailing wife
16:57 trailing wife
16:57 trailing wife
16:41 swksvolFF
|
