Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 04/26/2024 View Thu 04/25/2024 View Wed 04/24/2024 View Tue 04/23/2024 View Mon 04/22/2024 View Sun 04/21/2024 View Sat 04/20/2024
2013-08-23 Government
Local governments cutting hours over Obamacare costs
Many cash-strapped cities and counties facing the prospect of shelling out hundreds of thousands of dollars in new health-care costs under the Affordable Care Act are opting instead to reduce the number of hours their part-time employees work.

The decisions to cut employee hours come 16 months before employers -- including state and local governments -- will be required to offer health care coverage to employees who work at least 30 hours a week. Some local officials said the cuts are happening now either because of labor contracts that must be negotiated in advance, or because the local governments worry that employees who work at least 30 hours in the months leading up to the January 2015 implementation date would need to be included in their health-care plans.

On Tuesday, Middletown Township, New Jersey said it would reduce the hours of 25 part-time workers in order to avoid up to $775,000 in increased annual health-care costs. Earlier this month, Bee County, Tex., said it would limit its part-time workers to 24 hours per week when the new fiscal year starts on Oct. 1.
I bet all those affected voted for Bumble.....multiple times....
Last month, department heads in Brevard County, Fla., were told to plan similar cuts in advance of the 2015 deadline. Brevard County Insurance Director Jerry Visco estimated the new mandate would cost the county $10,000 per part-time employee -- or $1.38 million a year if all 138 part-time employees who work more than 30 hours a week are covered, he told Florida Today. The Brevard County libraries have already cut hours for 37 employees.

"It's not something we prefer to do, but the cost of health insurance is significant and would really impact municipal budgets," said Anthony Mercantante, Middletown's township administrator. "It's not something we can take on, particularly when we don't know some of the other ramifications of the Affordable Care Act. There are far more questions than answers right now."

Middletown spends about $9 million a year, out of its $65 million budget, on employee health policies, Mercantante said.

Elsewhere, Lynchburg, Va. administrators have cut hours for 35 to 40 part-time employees. Chesterfield County, just south of Richmond, is likely to cut the hours of "several hundred" employees, the county director of human resources told the Richmond Times-Dispatch earlier this year. Chippewa County, Wisc., will drop 15 part-time positions to avoid up to $163,000 in annual health care costs, the county administrator told Wisconsin Public Radio in April.

In a statement provided to GovBeat, White House Council of Economic Advisors chairman Jason Furman said there is no evidence that the Affordable Care Act is incentivizing employers to add part-time rather than full-time positions.

"Since the ACA became law, nearly 90% of the gain in employment has been in full-time positions. Furthermore, the law is helping make health insurance coverage more affordable which supports job growth," Furman said. "Just yesterday, we learned that the growth in employers' health care premiums has slowed significantly recently, to less than a third of the growth rate in the late '90s and early 2000s."

Other supporters of the law suggested the cuts could actually cost counties and cities more money than if they simply paid for part-time workers' health care costs.

"There are some costs of doing business where it really does cost you more money to have multiple people on the job," said Gary Burtless, a senior fellow of economic studies at the Brookings Institute. "Why would you create more jobs than you need to at 20 hours a week, when if you're really responding to the Affordable Care Act you would assign people to work 29 hours a week?"

"I don't think this is going to be a big direct-cost burden for counties and municipalities," Burtless added.

Mercantante, the Middletown administrator, says it's the uncertainty that's driving his town's actions. "Towns are going to have to start looking at different types of health care packages to offer to people given the new mandates, but I can't tell you what those are going to be or how much they're going to cost us," he said.
Posted by Beavis 2013-08-23 10:04|| || Front Page|| [7 views ]  Top

#1 Few Hours of Work Means Less Money Being Made - More Families are Becoming Poorer.

This Obamacare Bullshit Keeps Getting Deeper.
Posted by Otto Smiter of the Munchkins3415 2013-08-23 11:53||   2013-08-23 11:53|| Front Page Top

#2 Fewer hours = more employees.

More employees = less unemployment.

Less unemployment = more hope and change.
Posted by Besoeker 2013-08-23 12:05||   2013-08-23 12:05|| Front Page Top

#3 "There are some costs of doing business where it really does cost you more money to have multiple people on the job"

Maybe in the private sector...
Posted by Pappy 2013-08-23 13:23||   2013-08-23 13:23|| Front Page Top

#4 Cool. Cut some government employees, preferably the crappy ones who don't pull their weight anyway. My guess is that we could accomplish the same amount of work with fewer, higher quality employees + reasonable eGovernment and not skip a beat. In this 'sequester age', states and local governments have already shown amazing adaptability, doing more with less money and even competing with other jurisdictions over who can do the best job. I wish the Federal government had the same constraints that state and local government did (inability to run/finance deficits) as a way of focusing Washington's fucking greed. It's hard to see what they're doing as anything other than a giant China-financed Ponzi scheme that keeps us lemmings sucking from the teat. Obamacare is just another teat, this time with chocolate *and* strawberries. Mmmm, tasty.
Posted by Muggsy the Full Bosomed1713 2013-08-23 16:21||   2013-08-23 16:21|| Front Page Top

#5 More part time workers = fewer people with healthcare = crisis = more federal intervention = single payer.

All according to plan.
Posted by Iblis 2013-08-23 16:25||   2013-08-23 16:25|| Front Page Top

#6 Less-than-Part-Time wins the cigar!

You can just see our mighty future OWG + NAU, etc. rolling in $$$, just waiting to hand it out to Member-States + their electoral constituents.

Oh wait ...no one in Amerika has any $$$ because it is our righteous Globie duty to hand over 75-100% of our personal income(s) to the Govt. like the Frenchies wanna do.

GOVT = WASHINGTON, DC = NATIONAL-GOVT-VS-GLOBALIST/NAU-ETC-GOVT???

Give our $$$ to the National Fed, Regional Fed, Trans-Regional Fed, Continental Fed or the OWG/Globalist Fed???

Space Fed???

[WELCOME BACK KOTTER'S VINNY "I'M SOOO CONFUSED" BARBARINO here].
Posted by JosephMendiola 2013-08-23 23:03||   2013-08-23 23:03|| Front Page Top

03:50 Xyz
03:23 Grom the Reflective
02:45 Besoeker
02:13 Besoeker
02:02 Grom the Reflective
02:01 Grom the Reflective
01:49 NN2N1
01:45 NN2N1
01:44 NN2N1
01:40 NN2N1
01:36 NN2N1
01:34 Grom the Reflective
01:32 crazyhorse
01:07 Grom the Reflective
00:28 Angealing+B.+Hayes4677









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com