Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025 View Thu 05/22/2025
2011-09-15 Economy
General accused WH of pressuring him to change testimony for Democratic donor
With the White House already reeling over the Solyndra collapse, a new scandal may have erupted today that could make the disappearance of $535 million in taxpayer funds look like a paperwork glitch. Eli Lake starts off his new gig at The Daily Beast with a huge bombshell -- an accusation made to members of Congress from a four-star Air Force general that claimed the White House pressured him to change his testimony to boost a big donor to the Democratic Party:

The four-star Air Force general who oversees U.S. Space Command walked into a highly secured room on Capitol Hill a week ago to give a classified briefing to lawmakers and staff, and dropped a surprise. Pressed by members, Gen. William Shelton said the White House tried to pressure him to change his testimony to make it more favorable to a company tied to a large Democratic donor.

The episode--confirmed by The Daily Beast in interviews with administration officials and the chairman of a congressional oversight committee--is the latest in a string of incidents that have given Republicans sudden fodder for questions about whether the Obama administration is politically interfering in routine government matters that affect donors or fundraisers. Already, the FBI and a House committee are investigating a federal loan guarantee to a now failed solar firm called Solyndra that is tied to a large Obama fundraiser.

Now the Pentagon has been raising concerns about a new wireless project by a satellite broadband company in Virginia called LightSquared, whose majority owner is an investment fund run by Democratic donor Philip Falcone. Gen. Shelton was originally scheduled to testify Aug. 3 to a House committee that the project would interfere with the military's sensitive Global Positioning Satellite capabilities, which control automated driving directions and missile targeting, among other things.

According to officials familiar with the situation, Shelton's prepared testimony was leaked in advance to the company. And the White House asked the general to alter the testimony to add two points: that the general supported the White House policy to add more broadband for commercial use; and that the Pentagon would try to resolve the questions around LightSquared with testing in just 90 days. Shelton chafed at the intervention, which seemed to soften the Pentagon's position and might be viewed as helping the company as it tries to get the project launched, the officials said.

As Eli explains, it's not unusual to distribute prepared Congressional testimony in draft form to other related agencies before giving the testimony. The review gives everyone a chance to make sure that the facts are correct and the testimony is as accurate as possible. But sending Shelton's testimony to LightSquared would raise big red flags on its own -- let alone the accusation that the White House attempted to dictate Shelton's testimony to benefit LightSquared and their big donor.

Rep. Mike Turner told Eli that this was definitely an attempt to influence Shelton, bias his testimony, and essentially mislead Congress. And that has a watchdog organization drawing parallels between Shelton's accusation and the Solyndra collapse:

Melanie Sloan, who runs the nonpartisan ethics groups Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said the emerging allegations about possible White House involvement in LightSquared's matter seemed to mirror earlier allegations in the Solyndra case.

"With this new set of facts, it starts to sound like a pattern of the White House improperly pressuring people at agencies involving decisions that affect companies tied to donors and fundraisers," Sloan said. "It's always a problem when the White House is pressuring anyone's testimony. I don't care if you are a four-star [general] or a GS-15 [career employee], you should be giving your true opinion and not an opinion the White House is seeking for political expediency."

Quite frankly, this would be a lot more blatant and much more troubling. If the White House has been leaning on the military to mislead Congress in order to benefit Democratic donors, that indicates a whole new level of corruption, one that could seriously damage the non-partisan nature of civilian control of the military. If Shelton sticks to this accusation, then Congress needs to hold immediate hearings into who exactly pressured Shelton -- and from whom that person took his or her orders.
Wow.... if true, isn't this a impeachable offense? How much more of this blatant shoveling of money and influence into dhimocratic coffers and allies will the public take before demanding this fool steps down?
Posted by DarthVader 2011-09-15 12:40|| || Front Page|| [11132 views ]  Top

#1 whoops... mods I missed putting the URL in the link.

Sorry.
Posted by DarthVader 2011-09-15 12:43||   2011-09-15 12:43|| Front Page Top

#2 Not impeachable since nothing will ever be 'proven' at the standard required for an impeachment.
Posted by Steve White 2011-09-15 12:59||   2011-09-15 12:59|| Front Page Top

#3 It'll end up being another 'Van Jones' incident - someone will resign quietly and on Friday.
Posted by Pappy 2011-09-15 14:22||   2011-09-15 14:22|| Front Page Top

#4 I get the feeling that with the current Senate nothing would be an impeachable offense.
Posted by Thing from Snowy mountain 2011-09-15 15:00||   2011-09-15 15:00|| Front Page Top

#5 ...until the One's numbers hit 30 on the way down closely followed by anyone with a 'D' behind their name and office. Then like the Trunks during the Nixon fall, they'll start to line up to protect their own posteriors. Probably too late though by then.
Posted by Procopius2k 2011-09-15 16:20||   2011-09-15 16:20|| Front Page Top

#6  Gen. William Shelton said the White House tried to pressure him to change his testimony to make it more favorable to a company tied to a large Democratic donor.

If I am not mistaken General, I believe incidents of this nature fall into the "Waste Fraud and Abuse" category. Did you file such a report at the time of the alleged incident? Did you report it to the Chairman? Make an MFR, any fucking thing? If not, why not? "Pressed" were you? Alright, I think I understand.
Posted by Besoeker 2011-09-15 16:25||   2011-09-15 16:25|| Front Page Top

#7 Watch your back, general. Somebody's liable to report you to Attack Watch...
Posted by tu3031 2011-09-15 17:22||   2011-09-15 17:22|| Front Page Top

#8  I believe incidents of this nature fall into the "Waste Fraud and Abuse" category

Not really, since that covers acquisition or (mis)use of funds, equipment, etc. However, it should have been reported immediately as a security violation. Apparently things are done differently in U.S. Space Command and the Beltway military.
Posted by Pappy 2011-09-15 18:01||   2011-09-15 18:01|| Front Page Top

#9 That or the General who is a 4 star, meaning he is a competent political animal was doing battlespace preparation: let the White House illegally pressure him, and then drop the bombshell in a top secret committee meeting without showing his hand before. Any written report could have been 'misfiled' at the direction of the Secretary of the Air Force, and the General reassigned or retired. This way, he drops a nuke on Zero and his cronies in sworn testimony before the House, and inoculates himself against any political repercussions by said White House.
Posted by Shieldwolf 2011-09-15 19:08||   2011-09-15 19:08|| Front Page Top

#10 inoculates himself against any political repercussions by said White House.

tell that to the Fast & Furious whistle-blowers. He may be high enough profile for it to work, but the BATFE were retaliated against
Posted by Frank G 2011-09-15 19:10||   2011-09-15 19:10|| Front Page Top

#11 Maybe, but a 4 star has the time in and can retire with an income a lot of Americans would like to make just working.
Posted by Procopius2k 2011-09-15 21:39||   2011-09-15 21:39|| Front Page Top

#12 AND he keeps his honor
Posted by Frank G 2011-09-15 22:04||   2011-09-15 22:04|| Front Page Top

07:03 NN2N1
06:58 NN2N1
06:58 Besoeker
05:28 Whiskey Mike
05:23 Whiskey Mike
05:21 Whiskey Mike
05:18 Whiskey Mike
05:15 Whiskey Mike
05:13 Whiskey Mike
05:08 Whiskey Mike
05:05 Whiskey Mike
05:03 Whiskey Mike
03:23 Besoeker
02:05 Grom the Affective
02:04 Grom the Affective
01:26 49 Pan
00:22 EMS Artifact
00:16 Skidmark









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com