Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 06/07/2024 View Thu 06/06/2024 View Wed 06/05/2024 View Tue 06/04/2024 View Mon 06/03/2024 View Sun 06/02/2024 View Sat 06/01/2024
2009-01-13 Home Front: WoT
Obama plan to close Guantanamo may take a year
President-elect Barack Obama plans to issue an executive order on his first full day in office ordering the closing of the Guantanamo Bay detention camp in Cuba, people briefed by Obama transition officials said Monday.

But experts say it is likely to take many months, perhaps as long as a year, to empty the prison that has drawn international criticism since it received its first prisoners seven years ago this week. One transition official said the new administration expected that it would take several months to transfer some of the remaining 248 prisoners to other countries, decide how to try suspects and deal with the many other legal challenges posed by closing the camp.
Like for instance, which countries will volunteer to take some of these mooks. I don't see a line forming ...
People who have discussed the issues with transition officials in recent weeks said it appeared that the broad outlines of plans for the detention camp were taking shape. They said transition officials appeared committed to ordering an immediate suspension of the Bush administration's military commissions system for trying detainees.
All we know so far is what they don't want to do. When you're the executive you can't vote present. You need a plan. Closing Gitmo without having a plan for what to do next may sound good but isn't being an effective executive.
In addition, people who have conferred with transition officials said the incoming administration appeared to have rejected a proposal to seek a new law authorizing indefinite detention inside the United States. The Bush administration has insisted that such a measure is necessary to close the Guantanamo camp and bring some detainees to the United States.
Thereby daring the Dhimmicrats to vote for such a measure, which they won't and didn't do ...
Obama has repeatedly said he wants to close the camp. But in an interview on Sunday on ABC, he indicated that the process could take time, saying, "It is more difficult than I think a lot of people realize." Closing it within the first 100 days of his administration, he said, would be "a challenge."
That's not what you said last year ...
The president-elect drew criticism from some human rights groups Monday who said his remarks suggested that closing Guantanamo was not among the new administration's highest priorities.
The nutroots will try to keep his feet in the fire ...
But even if the detention camp remains open for months, the decision to address Guantanamo on the day after his inauguration seemed intended to make a symbolic break with some of the most controversial policies of the Bush administration.

Several national security and legal analysts have argued in recent weeks that Obama is in a delicate political position after having committed himself to closing the prison. Aside from analyzing intelligence and legal filings on each of the remaining detainees, diplomats and legal experts have said the new administration will need to begin an extensive new international effort to resettle as many as 150 or more of the remaining men. Portugal and other European countries have recently broken a long diplomatic standoff, saying they would work with the new administration and might accept some detainees who cannot be sent to their home countries because of concerns about their potential treatment.
Isn't the fact that you have concerns about their treatment if they're sent 'home', combined with the fact that you aren't willing to release them into your own home town in the U.S., an admission that these jokers should be kept behind walls?
Brooke Anderson, a transition spokeswoman, declined to comment on any plans, saying only, "President-elect Obama has repeatedly said that he believes that the legal framework at Guantanamo has failed to successfully and swiftly prosecute terrorists, and he shares the broad bipartisan belief that Guantanamo should be closed."

In formulating their policy in recent weeks, Obama transition officials have consulted with a variety of authorities on legal and human rights and with military experts. Several of those experts said the officials had expressed great interest in alternatives to the military commission system, like trying detainees in federal courts, and appeared to have grown hostile to proposals like an indefinite detention law.
It'd be a great circus to watch federal district court judges try these guys. The judges have no experience in judging intel matters, security, and international relations. Perfect for the job at hand ...
They also said the transition officials were intensely focused on new international efforts to transfer many of the detainees to other countries.
Name another country ...
Several said the officials appeared concerned that a proposal for a new law authorizing indefinite detention would bring the new administration much of the criticism that has been directed at the Bush administration over Guantanamo. A former military official who was part of a series of briefings at the transition headquarters in Washington said the officials had spoken about the indefinite detention proposal as a way of creating a "new Guantanamo someplace else."

"That is very much not the desire of the Obama team," said the former military official.

Catherine Powell, an associate professor of law at Fordham, said transition officials appeared most interested at a meeting last month in showing international critics that they were returning to what they see as traditional American legal values. "They are really looking for tools that we have in our existing system short of creating an indefinite detention system," Powell said.
There's nothing wrong with detaining indefinitely someone who has the stated position of wanting all of us dead. Once you accept that idea Gitmo becomes very reasonable.
Mark Denbeaux, a Seton Hall law professor who has been a prominent lawyer for Guantanamo detainees, said that at a briefing he attended with senior officials of the transition last month the officials seemed to have decided to suspend the military commissions immediately.

"Their position is they're a complete and utter failure," Denbeaux said.
Wonder why? Perhaps because the cabal of international 'rights' groups, bleeding heart Americans, and Soros-funded interest groups have worked to make them a failure? Talk about a self-fulfilling prophecy ...
The Pentagon has been pressing ahead with plans to begin a trial on Jan. 26 of one of its high profile suspects, a Canadian detainee named Omar Khadr. Khadr's case has drawn wide attention, partly because he was 15 when he was first detained on charges of killing an American soldier in a firefight in Afghanistan in 2002.

Some human rights groups said Monday that they were alarmed by Obama's vague timetable and lack of specifics in his remarks Sunday. They said they worried that the administration might yield to pressure to display its toughness in dealing with terrorism in its detention policies. "The devil is in the details," said Anthony Romero, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, who has been pressing the new administration to publicly commit to immediately close Guantanamo.
Sure Tony, just as soon as you tell us what to do with the inmates. And if you say, 'turn them loose', I'll suggest that we hold a member of your immediate family hostage to their good behavior.
Romero said he had grown concerned because transition officials had provided details of their plans for dealing with the economic crisis, but had yet to provide details for how they will close Guantanamo, which has brought worldwide criticism. "Just like we need specifics on an economic recovery package," Romero said, "we need specifics on a 'justice recovery package.' "
Posted by Steve White 2009-01-13 00:00|| || Front Page|| [10 views ]  Top

#1 I say put these gentlemen (and their supporters) in the pit that was the World Trade Center and have a plentiful supply of concrete chunks and steel scrap available for the peanut gallery above. Truly let the people decide their fate.
Posted by ed 2009-01-13 01:02||   2009-01-13 01:02|| Front Page Top

#2 Best ideaa of 2009, ed, no matter what anybody thinks up next...
Posted by M. Murcek">M. Murcek  2009-01-13 01:07||   2009-01-13 01:07|| Front Page Top

#3 If no country will take them, send them to the one place on the planet which belongs to no country. I hear Antarctica is lovely this time of year. And with Global Worming, it will get even nicer.
Posted by Glenmore 2009-01-13 08:12||   2009-01-13 08:12|| Front Page Top

#4 Someone will take them, they just haven't asked the right people yet.

Maybe Mauritania, or even the Gaza Strip.
Posted by bigjim-ky 2009-01-13 09:44||   2009-01-13 09:44|| Front Page Top

#5 Sen. Brownback suggested Obama look at the facilities at Fort Leavenworth before he decided to send them to Kansas.
Posted by bman 2009-01-13 10:37||   2009-01-13 10:37|| Front Page Top

#6 I wuz listening to my local NPR station this afternoon (they have some killer Blue Grass0 when All Things Considered came on. I decided to listen because the report was about Guantanimo. The Main Person Interviewed made the statement that most of the Gitmo prisoners are very dangerous and nobody countered him. I almost ran off the road because the interviewer agreed.
Posted by Deacon Blues">Deacon Blues  2009-01-13 18:45||   2009-01-13 18:45|| Front Page Top

#7 Hope and Change

Obama during the Primary:
"I will create 2.5 million new jobs."

Obama during the Election:
"I will create and save 2.5 million jobs."

Obama during the Inauguration:
"I will save 3 million jobs."
Posted by Skunky Glins 5***">Skunky Glins 5***  2009-01-13 21:46||   2009-01-13 21:46|| Front Page Top

01:16 Seeking Cure For Ignorance
00:33 Skidmark
00:28 Besoeker
00:28 Skidmark
00:17 Besoeker
00:11 DooDahMan
00:09 DooDahMan









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com