Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 04/19/2024 View Thu 04/18/2024 View Wed 04/17/2024 View Tue 04/16/2024 View Mon 04/15/2024 View Sun 04/14/2024 View Sat 04/13/2024
2008-04-12 Science & Technology
Massive Domestic Espionage Network To Go Online
The Bush administration said yesterday that it plans to start using the nation's most advanced spy technology for domestic purposes soon, rebuffing challenges by House Democrats over the idea's legal authority.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said his department will activate his department's new domestic satellite surveillance office in stages, starting as soon as possible with traditional scientific and homeland security activities -- such as tracking hurricane damage, monitoring climate change and creating terrain maps.

Sophisticated overhead sensor data will be used for law enforcement once privacy and civil rights concerns are resolved, he said. The department has previously said the program will not intercept communications.

"There is no basis to suggest that this process is in any way insufficient to protect the privacy and civil liberties of Americans," Chertoff wrote to Reps. Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.) and Jane Harman (D-Calif.), chairmen of the House Homeland Security Committee and its intelligence subcommittee, respectively, in letters released yesterday.

"I think we've fully addressed anybody's concerns," Chertoff added in remarks last week to bloggers. "I think the way is now clear to stand it up and go warm on it."

His statements marked a fresh determination to operate the department's new National Applications Office as part of its counterterrorism efforts. The administration in May 2007 gave DHS authority to coordinate requests for satellite imagery, radar, electronic-signal information, chemical detection and other monitoring capabilities that have been used for decades within U.S. borders for mapping and disaster response.

But Congress delayed launch of the new office last October. Critics cited its potential to expand the role of military assets in domestic law enforcement, to turn new or as-yet-undeveloped technologies against Americans without adequate public debate, and to divert the existing civilian and scientific focus of some satellite work to security uses.

Democrats say Chertoff has not spelled out what federal laws govern the NAO, whose funding and size are classified. Congress barred Homeland Security from funding the office until its investigators could review the office's operating procedures and safeguards. The department submitted answers on Thursday, but some lawmakers promptly said the response was inadequate.

"I have had a firsthand experience with the trust-me theory of law from this administration," said Harman, citing the 2005 disclosure of the National Security Agency's domestic spying program, which included warrantless eavesdropping on calls and e-mails between people in the United States and overseas. "I won't make the same mistake. . . . I want to see the legal underpinnings for the whole program."

Thompson called DHS's release Thursday of the office's procedures and a civil liberties impact assessment "a good start." But, he said, "We still don't know whether the NAO will pass constitutional muster since no legal framework has been provided."

DHS officials said the demands are unwarranted. "The legal framework that governs the National Applications Office . . . is reflected in the Constitution, the U.S. Code and all other U.S. laws," said DHS spokeswoman Laura Keehner. She said its operations will be subject to "robust," structured legal scrutiny by multiple agencies.
Welcome to the fishbowl.
Posted by Anonymoose 2008-04-12 16:10|| || Front Page|| [9 views ]  Top

#1 It's like phone tapping. Most of us are of no interest whatsoever to those looking for illegals and terrorists.
Posted by trailing wife ">trailing wife  2008-04-12 18:57||   2008-04-12 18:57|| Front Page Top

#2 Would you feel that way if Obama or Hillary were President?
Posted by Anonymoose 2008-04-12 19:36||   2008-04-12 19:36|| Front Page Top

#3 Would you feel that way if Obama or Hillary were President?

Nope. In fact I would expect a full fascist dictatorship to come about if either of those people gain power.

HI NSA!!
Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader  2008-04-12 19:42||   2008-04-12 19:42|| Front Page Top

#4 I have to say this has little to do with terrorism and lots to do with spying on everyone else. Welcome to guilty until we get you to court where you have to prove you are innocent against the full weight of the whole federal government. This is a fascist wet dream come true.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2008-04-12 21:23||   2008-04-12 21:23|| Front Page Top

16:26 Skidmark
16:25 Grom the Reflective
15:31 European Conservative
15:30 Grom the Reflective
14:45 NoMoreBS
14:39 NoMoreBS
14:39 Frank G
14:35 NoMoreBS
14:31 NoMoreBS
14:30 Penguin_of_the_Desert
14:17 NoMoreBS
14:04 swksvolFF
13:48 NoMoreBS
13:40 Frank G
13:40  
13:32 swksvolFF
13:27 EMS Artifact
13:25 Secret Master
13:08 swksvolFF
13:05 mossomo
13:01 mossomo
12:55 swksvolFF
12:52 swksvolFF
12:50 jpal









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com