Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025 View Thu 05/22/2025
2007-10-18 Home Front: Politix
Pelosi working on impeachment on the QT?
Jeff Goldstein, "Protein Wisdom"

Via Richard M, who attended a meeting of anti-war activists in Los Angeles on Sunday:

Congresswoman Diane Watson (D-Culver City) spoke in front of an audience of some 150 activists from various LA antiwar organizations at an Iraq Town Hall meeting in Los Angeles on Sunday, October 14th . . . .

The audience responded angrily when Watson responded to a call for the impeachment of President Bush by saying, "We simply don't have the votes." After groans and boos and at least one cry of "At least do something!", Watson went on to say, "Right now, Speaker (Nancy) Pelosi is working very quietly and very effectively, behind the scenes. We need 285 votes to uphold an impeachment, and so far we have 260 members telling us they support impeachment."

[Watson] went on to say, "Our goal has to be the White House in 2008 and 60 seats, then we can think about an impeachment," apparently referring to winning a veto-proof majority in the Senate and [raising] the possibility that a Democratic administration might undertake a prosecution of George Bush after he's left office.

When contacted by LA conservative activist Deborah Leigh, Pelosi's office repeated the Speaker's position, [outlined] before the 2006 election, that "impeachment is off the table." They declined to comment on Congresswoman Watson's statement and numbers.

If Congresswoman Watson was telling the truth to the assembled activists, this raises the question of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's control over her own delegation, and even her awareness of what is going on in her own party; [either that], or that Ms. Pelosi has not been dealing forthrightly with the American people and the Adminstration. [Alternately] Congresswoman Watson was willing to [deceive] a gathering of the Democratic Party's most gullible active supporters.

Sadly, each of these explanations seems equally plausible. Which -- equally sadly -- speaks volumes about today's Congressional Democrats.

. . .

update: One of the most intriguing soundbites from Rep. Watson is her claim that the Dems have evidence of impeachable offenses.

Tellingly, she doesn't cite any -- and I'm not sure "carrying out a war that we were for before we, like, changed our minds and stuff" carries that kind of weight with the American electorate -- so I'd be curious to know just what "evidence" the Dems think they have.

Something to do with the NSA program, is my guess -- but that's a loser, both legally and politically.

Still, I do so love when their synapses get to firing like that. Makes the whole room smell like Jiffy-Pop.
Posted by Mike 2007-10-18 10:35|| || Front Page|| [11135 views ]  Top

#1 ...when Watson responded to a call for the impeachment of President Bush by saying, "We simply don't have the votes."

Gridlock, a plot by the people to try to control a run-a-way Congress.
Posted by JohnQC 2007-10-18 11:03||   2007-10-18 11:03|| Front Page Top

#2 "Our goal has to be the White House in 2008 and 60 seats, then we can think about an impeachment,"

*speechless*
Posted by trailing wife 2007-10-18 11:52||   2007-10-18 11:52|| Front Page Top

#3 "Our goal has to be the White House in 2008 and 60 seats, then we can think about an impeachment,"

WTF??? They think they can impeach him after he's not in office? How bizzare is that. Or are they already planning to impeach any Repub that might win in 2008?

These people are sick, traitorous, meglomaniaces!
Posted by AlanC 2007-10-18 12:37||   2007-10-18 12:37|| Front Page Top

#4 "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
Thomas Jefferson
Posted by SR-71">SR-71  2007-10-18 12:55||   2007-10-18 12:55|| Front Page Top

#5 More babble from a Democrat in an open forum. Face it, Congresswoman Watson spewed whatever came to her little mind to get the halfwits off her ass.
Posted by DepotGuy 2007-10-18 13:27||   2007-10-18 13:27|| Front Page Top

#6 Well, going off their track record of success so far, I wouldn't be all that worried about this...
Posted by tu3031 2007-10-18 13:33||   2007-10-18 13:33|| Front Page Top

#7 Impeach Bush?

GREAT! You go do that.

Meanwhile PRESIDENT CHENEY will do just fine.

And you'll get your ass handed to you just like the Repubs did over impeachment.

Want to impeach him for something that EVERYONE can get behind? Start wih hthe mess at the Mexican border, the kowtowing to Mexico in our legal system, and abandoning our sovereignty for cheap labor.

Posted by OldSpook 2007-10-18 14:15||   2007-10-18 14:15|| Front Page Top

#8 They want payback for Bill's impeachment. This won't go away until they get a tit for our tat.
Posted by Iblis 2007-10-18 16:43||   2007-10-18 16:43|| Front Page Top

#9 And the Saudis OldSpook, don't forget the Saudis.
Posted by bigjim-ky 2007-10-18 17:30||   2007-10-18 17:30|| Front Page Top

#10 Has Nancy *ever* done anything quietly and effectively?
Posted by SteveS 2007-10-18 19:03||   2007-10-18 19:03|| Front Page Top

#11 They want payback for Bill's impeachment. This won't go away until they get a tit for our tat.

I thought Bill's problem was that he tried to get too much . . . you know . . .
Posted by Mike 2007-10-18 21:34||   2007-10-18 21:34|| Front Page Top

11:11 HeavyG
11:10 Angstrom
11:07 HeavyG
11:07 Angstrom
11:06 DarthVader
11:05 HeavyG
10:58 alanc
09:43 Mullah Richard
09:27 Warthog
09:11 Mercutio
09:07 AlmostAnonymous5839
08:52 Matt
08:24 Matt
08:20 SteveS
07:43 Procopius2k
07:42 BrerRabbit
07:42 Procopius2k
07:39 Procopius2k
07:36 Procopius2k
07:35 Procopius2k
07:34 trailing wife
07:31 Procopius2k
07:30 NN2N1
07:22 NN2N1









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com