2007-07-26 Home Front: Culture Wars
|
Lawsuits could be putting "Ladies' Nights" in Bars Across the Country on the Rocks.
|
Lawsuits could be putting "Ladies' Nights" at bars and clubs across the country on the rocks. In about two dozen cases, plaintiffs contend these drink and admission deals for women constitute discrimination against men and should be banned.
Roy Den Hollander is a spoilsport New York lawyer who hasn't been laid in a good long while says Ladies' Night drinks and admission specials are unconstitutional, and he says he's suffered personally.
"C'mon, please!?"
"No! Get lost, creep!" | Hollander is also a graduate of Columbia Business School and seems like a guy who should be able to get into a decent bar and afford the drinks. So what irks him?
"I'm tired of having my rights violated and being treated as a second-class citizen," said Hollander, who is seeking class-action status for his suit in federal court.
Whiny git. I bet he still uses Clearosil. | Tim Gleason, general manager of the China Club in New York, calls Hollander's complaint "pathetic" and echoes other club owners who argue that the discounts actually help both sexes by balancing out the ratio between men and women. Nevermind that some men are more than happy to pay for inequality in the ratio department.
Over the last 30 years, lawsuits stemming from promotions involving Ladies' Night have enjoyed considerable success in courts across the country where judges have held that single-sex discounts violate state and federal statutes guaranteeing equal protection under the law.
George Washington University law professor John Banzhaf, whose students have brought a Ladies' Night suit, says that these promotions are part of a broader class of gender-based price discrimination tactics like those used by hairdressers and dry cleaners who charge men and women different prices for the same service. In Washington, D.C., he hopes to pursue what he calls restroom equity or "squatter's rights" in which he will sue public venues whose restroom availability, though seemingly equal for both sexes, has a "disparate impact" on women who must deal with longer lines and wait times.
|
Posted by JohnQC 2007-07-26 00:00||
||
Front Page|| [11133 views ]
Top
|
Posted by JosephMendiola 2007-07-26 01:15||
2007-07-26 01:15||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by zazz 2007-07-26 02:19||
2007-07-26 02:19||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by whatadeal 2007-07-26 02:45||
2007-07-26 02:45||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by ArmChair in sin 2007-07-26 06:05||
2007-07-26 06:05||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by tu3031 2007-07-26 12:38||
2007-07-26 12:38||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Pliny Flunter1136 2007-07-26 14:28||
2007-07-26 14:28||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Abdominal Snowman 2007-07-26 21:35||
2007-07-26 21:35||
Front Page
Top
|
|
17:48 49 Pan
17:38 Lord Garth
17:29 alanc
17:09 BrerRabbit
16:13 Pancho Poodle8452
16:08 Beavis
16:08 Lord Garth
15:52 Lord Garth
15:28 trailing wife
15:26 Pancho Poodle8452
15:26 trailing wife
14:34 Frank G
14:28 Melancholic
14:27 NoMoreBS
14:14 swksvolFF
14:12 swksvolFF
13:54 mossomo
13:51 mossomo
13:50 NoMoreBS
13:50 Abu Uluque
13:44 Abu Uluque
13:41 NoMoreBS
13:39 Abu Uluque
13:36 mossomo









|