Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 05/18/2024 View Fri 05/17/2024 View Thu 05/16/2024 View Wed 05/15/2024 View Tue 05/14/2024 View Mon 05/13/2024 View Sun 05/12/2024
2005-07-27 Home Front: WoT
Pentagon Blocks Release of Abu Ghraib Images (or not)
NEW YORK So what is shown on the 87 photographs and four videos from Abu Ghraib prison that the Pentagon, in an eleventh hour move, blocked from release this weekend? One clue: Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told Congress last year, after viewing a large cache of unreleased images: "I mean, I looked at them last night, and they're hard to believe. They show acts "that can only be described as blatantly sadistic, cruel and inhumane," he added. A Republican Senator suggested the same day they contained scenes of “rape and murder.” No wonder Rumsfeld commented then, "If these are released to the public, obviously it's going to make matters worse."

Yesterday, news emerged that lawyers for the Pentagon had refused to cooperate with a federal judge's order to release dozens of unseen photographs and videos from Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq by Saturday. The photos were among thousands turned over by the key “whistleblower” in the scandal, Specialist Joseph M. Darby. Just a few that were released to the press sparked the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal last year, and the video images are said to be even more shocking. The Pentagon lawyers said in a letter sent to the federal court in Manhattan that they would file a sealed brief explaining their reasons for not turning over the material. They had been ordered to do so by a federal judge in response to a FOIA lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU accused the government Friday of putting another legal roadblock in the way of its bid to allow the public to see the images of the prisoner abuse scandal. One Pentagon lawyer has argued that they should not be released because they would only add to the humiliation of the prisoners. But the ACLU has said the faces of the victims can easily be "redacted."
Well, that's not what really happened, was it PT? Even your beloved NYT was forced to issue a correction yesterday:
An article on Saturday about a federal judge's order regarding photographs and videotapes related to the Abu Ghraib prison scandal misstated a deadline and the response by Defense Department lawyers. The government was given until Friday to black out some identifying details in the material, not to release it. Defense Department lawyers met that deadline, but asked the court to block the public release of the materials. They did not refuse to cooperate with an order for the materials' release.

To get a sense of what may be shown in these images, one has to go back to press reports from when the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal was still front page news. This is how CNN reported it on May 8, 2004, in a typical account that day:
Like we believe CNN
“U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld revealed Friday that videos and ‘a lot more pictures’ exist of the abuse of Iraqis held at Abu Ghraib prison. "’If these are released to the public, obviously it's going to make matters worse,’ Rumsfeld told the Senate Armed Services Committee. ‘I mean, I looked at them last night, and they're hard to believe.’ “The embattled defense secretary fielded sharp and skeptical questions from lawmakers as he testified about the growing prisoner abuse scandal. A military report about that abuse describes detainees being threatened, sodomized with a chemical light and forced into sexually humiliating poses. “Charges have been brought against seven service members, and investigations into events at the prison continue.
And the last trial is going on right now
“Military investigators have looked into -- or are continuing to investigate -- 35 cases of alleged abuse or deaths of prisoners in detention facilities in the Central Command theater, according to Army Secretary Les Brownlee. Two of those cases were deemed homicides, he said.

"’The American public needs to understand we're talking about rape and murder here. We're not just talking about giving people a humiliating experience,’ Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina told reporters after Rumsfeld testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee. ’We're talking about rape and murder -- and some very serious charges.’
Maybe there were charges, but none of them have been proven to be true.

“A report by Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba on the abuse at the prison outside Baghdad says videotapes and photographs show naked detainees, and that groups of men were forced to masturbate while being photographed and videotaped. Taguba also found evidence of a ‘male MP guard having sex with a female detainee.’
Did he? Don't recall any charges being filed
“Rumsfeld told Congress the unrevealed photos and videos contain acts 'that can only be described as blatantly sadistic, cruel and inhuman.’”
They were a bunch of assholes on the night shift, and they're spending time in jail. Their lawyers tried to shift the blame up to Rumsfeld, but failed.
The military later screened some of the images for lawmakers, who said they showed, among other things, attack dogs snarling at cowed prisoners, Iraqi women forced to expose their breasts, and naked prisoners forced to have sex with each other. In the same period, reporter Seymour Hersh, who helped uncover the scandal, said in a speech before an ACLU convention: “Some of the worse that happened that you don't know about, ok? Videos, there are women there. Some of you may have read they were passing letters, communications out to their men
.The women were passing messages saying ‘Please come and kill me, because of what's happened.
’Seymour Hersh is one of the biggest leftists in the media, speaking before the American Communist Litigation Unit.
“Basically what happened is that those women who were arrested with young boys/children in cases that have been recorded. The boys were sodomized with the cameras rolling. The worst about all of them is the soundtrack of the boys shrieking that your government has. They are in total terror it's going to come out.”
Posted by Pholuque Threreth9564 2005-07-27 07:49|| || Front Page|| [16 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 In the same period, reporter Seymour Hersh, who helped uncover the scandal, said in a speech before an ACLU convention:

More complete bullshit from the press. Hersh did NOTHING about Abu Ghraib except reprint rumors, defense lawyer spin, and lie, lie, lie. It was uncovered by the military. It as reported by the military in daily press briefings months before Hersh got his first hard-on over the story.

When will the press be held accountable for its lies?
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2005-07-27 12:23|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-07-27 12:23|| Front Page Top

#2 I saw this Article on the Left Coaster blog earlier. I got the impression that there might be children and women involved and that the U.S. wanted to black out their faces. I patiently explained to the LLL that it was a good choice to withhold and black out photos if they involved pedophilia. Also it made no sense to release photos of abuse (they want to call it interrogations) without covering the faces of the abused. They are still of the impression that Rumsfeld is responsible and personally ordered, if not participated in, the abuse at Abu Grahib. Friggin moonbats! Nothing is added by the release of these photos unless Senator Kennedy needs to add them to his personal collection.
Posted by Flavise Flatle6161 2005-07-27 12:28||   2005-07-27 12:28|| Front Page Top

#3 I don't doubt that there were abuses at abu Ghraib -- we know there were. The specific ones mentioned below: womens' breasts exposed, prisoners threatened with dogs, simulated or real sex between prisoners and the deaths of several prisoners - have been acknowledged by the Pentagon and were under investigation well before the press got wind of them.

And, SECDEF Rumsfeld has testified that he found the abuses horrible, that they were not officially sanctioned and deserved punishment - which has happened to at least several of the perpetrators.

Are there worse abuses that have not been made public? Possibly -- but an article based on a snapshot in time over a year ago isn't quite persuasive to me. Unnamed senators speculating -- 14 months ago -- on what MIGHT have happened is less than useful.

My own suspicion is that critics of the war in Iraq want the photos released because visual images can be replayed on TV stations throughout the Muslim world. We saw the impact of this strategy when Newsweek's incorrect article about Koran desecration led to riots and death. Absolutely no mitigation of that by Newsweek's later retraction of the story -- the damage was done by the images beamed around the world to millions of people, many of whom are functionally illiterate.

Steve notes, albeit with a bit of energy, that a key allegation in this article from a media insiders journal is factually incorrect. Once again, a damaging allegation is made that is later withdrawn -- but the original lie continues to circulate.
Posted by rkb 2005-07-27 12:32||   2005-07-27 12:32|| Front Page Top

#4 My own suspicion is that critics of the war in Iraq want the photos released because visual images can be replayed on TV stations throughout the Muslim world.

Ding!

That's the goal. Given that one of the London bombers said he was motivated by the -- false -- reports of torture at Gitmo, the whole reason to get the pictures out is to motivate more attacks.

The press, the ACLU, the left -- they hate this country, its people, and its Constitution.
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2005-07-27 12:49|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-07-27 12:49|| Front Page Top

#5 Abu Ghraib, again? What is this, a slow news day or something? This crap was old many, many months ago.

Posted by Dave D. 2005-07-27 13:11||   2005-07-27 13:11|| Front Page Top

#6 PT's dredging - anything Anti-America is timeless to the idiot left, particularly since it's easier to embellish as age dims memories. See: Ward Churchill and the smallpox blanket. Same scum
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2005-07-27 13:47||   2005-07-27 13:47|| Front Page Top

#7 The point to all this equine necroflailia, of course, is to undermine our resolve to win this war.

I'm beginning to wonder how much longer we can sustain our suicidal hyper-tolerance not only of the Muslim extremists among us, but also of our seditious Left.

My guess is, not much longer.
Posted by Dave D. 2005-07-27 14:12||   2005-07-27 14:12|| Front Page Top

#8 Given their recent meme efforts have gone down in flames, Downing St Memo, Rove is a Criminal, etc. and the scandal cupboard is currently bare, well, they're prolly just reverting to their last PR success. Desperation suits them rather well, methinks.

I want the MSM stooges and tools lined up against the wall first.
Posted by .com 2005-07-27 14:25||   2005-07-27 14:25|| Front Page Top

#9 The ACLU doesn't give a whit about protecting my rights, the only thing that interest them is tearing down out country because they hate it. Dittos for the press.

I have planed what I will do if one of these critters crosses my path. The ACLU and Press in this country are outside the protection of the law as far as I am concerned.
Posted by Sock Puppet 0’ Doom 2005-07-27 14:56||   2005-07-27 14:56|| Front Page Top

#10 The MSM sharks are in overdrive feeding frenzy since they were last outted by the Karen flushing "story" in Newsweak.

They couldn't give a shit about fostering incitement around the world.
Posted by Captain America 2005-07-27 23:44||   2005-07-27 23:44|| Front Page Top

20:43 Super Hose
20:26 Gleremble+Bucket3559
20:24 Gleremble+Bucket3559
20:21 Gleremble+Bucket3559
20:09 alanc
20:04 alanc
20:02 Anon1
19:43 Frank G
19:39 Procopius2k
19:00 SteveS
18:59 Rambler in Virginia
18:46 irish rage boy
18:43 irish rage boy
18:22 Whiskey Mike
18:13 Whiskey Mike
18:06 Whiskey Mike
17:57 jpal
17:29 Javiter+Dark+Lord+of+the+Faith7963
17:18 Bobby
16:28 DooDahMan
16:20 Skidmark
16:13 Ebbuger Whuque4103
15:42 Skidmark
15:27 Throlush Dark Lord of the Nebraskans2736









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com