Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 09/10/2023 View Sat 09/09/2023 View Fri 09/08/2023 View Thu 09/07/2023 View Wed 09/06/2023 View Tue 09/05/2023 View Mon 09/04/2023
1
2023-09-10 -Land of the Free
Case against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton at state Senate trial is falling apart
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2023-09-10 01:10|| || Front Page|| [20 views ]  Top

#1 The whole thing is a hit job from day one. The Dems and the establishment Repubs cut a deal to squash him. Kinda like what they did to the Tea Party.
They both agree that if it's not under their control, it needs to be broken.
Posted by ed in texas 2023-09-10 09:09||   2023-09-10 09:09|| Front Page Top

#2 Everything these days is tending towards zero threshold. I think soon, the DOJ will just send out letters to random people telling them they have probably committed a crime and will be indicted soon.

We're headed from "burden of proof" to "burden to prove you are innocent," the exact opposite of what the Founders intended.
Posted by M. Murcek 2023-09-10 09:14||   2023-09-10 09:14|| Front Page Top

#3 Ah, but my wife, who thinks he is guilty of many things, observed, "Well, this is not a criminal trial. The senators can vote on evidence or politics."

I think that supports Ed's statement (#1).
Posted by Bobby 2023-09-10 10:24||   2023-09-10 10:24|| Front Page Top

#4 In an impeachment case, the defendant’s popularity is important as the evidence. They certainly can remove him without evidence, but voters are awake an engaged. Getting the Liz Cheney treatment will become a more and more common occurrence going forward.
Posted by Super Hose 2023-09-10 10:56||   2023-09-10 10:56|| Front Page Top

#5 Bernalillo DA piles on, won't enforce NM dem gubberner's unconstitutional anti-2A "health emergency.

This is how politicians who understand the law can check and balance those that don't.
Posted by M. Murcek 2023-09-10 12:06||   2023-09-10 12:06|| Front Page Top

#6 I think the gubner understands the law well enough. She just disagrees with it, and so it goes away.
Posted by Rex Mundi 2023-09-10 12:45||   2023-09-10 12:45|| Front Page Top

#7 No wonder that harridan Pelosi said that Trump will have a chance to "prove his innocence".
Posted by DooDahMan 2023-09-10 12:47||   2023-09-10 12:47|| Front Page Top

#8 /\ "prove his innocence."

The classic Stalin model.
Posted by Besoeker 2023-09-10 13:27||   2023-09-10 13:27|| Front Page Top

23:33 crazyhorse
23:21 Hupaque Sneash7655
23:20 Skidmark
23:19 Skidmark
23:16 Skidmark
23:15 Skidmark
23:13 Skidmark
23:07 Skidmark
23:04 Skidmark
23:02 Skidmark
22:59 Skidmark
22:58 Skidmark
22:47 ACA JOE
22:43 Hupaque Sneash7655
22:38 SteveS
22:14 Hupaque Sneash7655
22:06 Enver Slager8035
21:54 Enver Slager8035
21:54 Hupaque Sneash7655
21:48 Enver Slager8035
21:44 Hupaque Sneash7655
21:34 Enver Slager8035
21:32 Enver Slager8035
21:21 Enver Slager8035









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com