Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 06/28/2018 View Wed 06/27/2018 View Tue 06/26/2018 View Mon 06/25/2018 View Sun 06/24/2018 View Sat 06/23/2018 View Fri 06/22/2018
1
2018-06-28 Home Front: Politix
Prominent Dems Freak Out Over SCOTUS Retirement On Twitter
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Raj 2018-06-28 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 Mods - hook a brother up - I submitted these as three separate posts. Thanks!
Posted by Raj 2018-06-28 00:41||   2018-06-28 00:41|| Front Page Top

#2 You did indeed submit three separate posts, Raj. But for ease of reading, we cluster briefs on the same topic —and this way all the comments on the subject will be in the same thread.

Today we happen to have clusters by province in Iraq, too.
Posted by trailing wife 2018-06-28 01:28||   2018-06-28 01:28|| Front Page Top

#3 Got it - thanks!
Posted by Raj 2018-06-28 01:36||   2018-06-28 01:36|| Front Page Top

#4 The outrage centers (as it always has) on the convenience of infant murder. Roe v. Wade is a democratic litmus test.
Posted by Besoeker 2018-06-28 02:41||   2018-06-28 02:41|| Front Page Top

#5 I hope Trump sticks it to the unhinged left this time and nominates another justice like Bork to replace retiring justice Kennedy.
I would love for conservatives to fight back this time and to not cave in to the hate filled radicals this time like 1987 with justice Bork.
It is now very obvious what the leftist radicals were trying to do way back in 1987 by torpedoing justice Bork.
The leftist were attempting to legislate their lawless tyranny on the entire country at the hand of a few radical justices.
As soon as Trump was elected these leftist justices sprung into action in collusion with social justice groups throughout the country to make judicial rulings from the bench to block the executive branch from carrying out any of its administrative roles to keep the country safe from those who would seek to enter the country illegally and then carry out other crimes or simply by voting to give power to those leftist who would attempt to take over the country for their tyrannical purposes.
Posted by boomerc 2018-06-28 04:45||   2018-06-28 04:45|| Front Page Top

#6 Maybe Trump should just pick a judge who'll faithfully follow what the US constitution says...
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2018-06-28 07:14||   2018-06-28 07:14|| Front Page Top

#7 Make them a deal. Congress has 90 days to either pass a Constitutional Amendment limiting judicial terms to 16 years or the Trunk senate can confirm his nominee. Taking a 'life' appointment out of the game would reduce the 'tension' of these games.
Posted by Procopius2k 2018-06-28 07:19||   2018-06-28 07:19|| Front Page Top

#8 #7 - Great idea, BUT. 2/3ds of the states would have to approve it. Could take years or never happen at all.
Posted by M. Murcek 2018-06-28 08:45||   2018-06-28 08:45|| Front Page Top

#9 I'm for going farther, P2K

Expand the SCOTUS to 50. Each state appoints their judge for a term of one year. Vice-president gets tie breaker vote just like Senate.

Good luck packing that court.
Posted by DarthVader 2018-06-28 09:09||   2018-06-28 09:09|| Front Page Top

#10 #8 - yes, the states have to weigh in. The ones operating under judicial decrees that tell them how to spend their tax income, telling them how to gerrymander their districts, who gets standing to sue them, et al. It'll take about one to two state legislative sessions to get 2/3rds.
Posted by Procopius2k 2018-06-28 10:48||   2018-06-28 10:48|| Front Page Top

#11 Record the outrage and use it in commercials during the election season.
Posted by rjschwarz 2018-06-28 12:12||   2018-06-28 12:12|| Front Page Top

#12 #6 -- That's crazy talk, BP. It's, like, 100 years old or something.

A point not to lose sight of is that the nominee must have nothing, and I mean nothing, in his or her personal life that would provide a basis for blackmail.
Posted by Matt 2018-06-28 12:17||   2018-06-28 12:17|| Front Page Top

#13 #12 #6 -- That's crazy talk, BP. It's, like, 100 years old or something.

Thank you Tommy Vietor
Posted by Frank G 2018-06-28 16:00||   2018-06-28 16:00|| Front Page Top

#14  Roe v. Wade is a democratic litmus test.

They're the Blood for Baal party.
Posted by charger 2018-06-28 19:13||   2018-06-28 19:13|| Front Page Top

23:57 Thromoger Ulorong4442
23:16 Whiskey Mike
22:31 gorb
22:19 trailing wife
21:52 ruprecht
21:49 Frank G
21:45 bbrewer126
21:42 JohnQC
21:34 bbrewer126
21:29 bbrewer126
21:28 Mullah Richard
21:25 JohnQC
21:21 lord garth
21:20 DarthVader
21:19 DarthVader
21:08 ruprecht
21:02 Thomorong Big Foot9811
20:50 DarthVader
20:46 Zenobia Floger6220
20:41 Frank G
20:24 ruprecht
20:23 ruprecht
20:15 lord garth
19:56 ruprecht









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com