Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 11/18/2015 View Tue 11/17/2015 View Mon 11/16/2015 View Sun 11/15/2015 View Sat 11/14/2015 View Fri 11/13/2015 View Thu 11/12/2015
1
2015-11-18 Science & Technology
Replacing the 'Boomers' with Boeing 747s?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Skidmark 2015-11-18 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Gods, not the 747 cruise missile carrier idea again. *facepalms* IIRC, I last saw this concept back in the carter administration, right after they canceled the B-1 bomber.

Nihil sub sole novum.
Posted by Nguard 2015-11-18 01:24||   2015-11-18 01:24|| Front Page Top

#2 And yet we're still relying upon B-52s (whose airframes were built before the crews were born), to still do missions.
Posted by Procopius2k 2015-11-18 09:13||   2015-11-18 09:13|| Front Page Top

#3 Can 74's also serve as a platform for Abrams tanks?
Posted by Vast Right Wing Conspiracy 2015-11-18 09:20||   2015-11-18 09:20|| Front Page Top

#4 Not a bad idea for a quick and cheap supplement to existing platforms. Especially now that the missiles can be programmed on the fly.

I just don't want the bean counters in congress and the pentegon to start saying that this can replace all the bombers like they say about the F-35 replacing the A-10.

A Cruise missile carrier is an excellent supplement for a prestrike option prior to a large bombing campaign to take out air defenses. It isn't a replacement.
Posted by DarthVader 2015-11-18 10:48||   2015-11-18 10:48|| Front Page Top

#5 New F-150s are lighter due to military-grade aluminum bodies. Lower fuel consumption and an alternative to the 747. Drink UP!
Posted by Frank G 2015-11-18 15:42||   2015-11-18 15:42|| Front Page Top

#6 A replacement for the boomers? While the payload may be similar, an Ohio-class boat would seem to have the advantage when it comes to loiter time and stealth. Maybe one size doesn't fit all.

F-150s tricked out as autonomous hunter-killers with missiles and machine guns would be pretty cool.
Posted by SteveS 2015-11-18 16:46||   2015-11-18 16:46|| Front Page Top

#7 I don't see any really good reason that amphibious F-150s couldn't replace the LCS on a one for one basis. 3 crew with one extra berth, 70 knots for 350 miles. ~ $95,000 in Pentagon motif.
Posted by Shipman 2015-11-18 18:18||   2015-11-18 18:18|| Front Page Top

23:49 gorb
22:19 JosephMendiola
22:18 JosephMendiola
22:11 JosephMendiola
21:44 rjschwarz
21:23 KBK
21:21 KBK
20:59 trailing wife
20:28 Redneck Jim
20:20 Redneck Jim
20:11 Redneck Jim
20:03 bbrewer126
19:38 Rambler in Virginia
19:35 Rambler in Virginia
19:30 Old Patriot
18:55 jvalentour
18:28 Deacon Blues
18:22 Shipman
18:18 Shipman
18:13 Shipman
18:11 Pappy
18:11 Shipman
18:10 Shipman
18:09 Pappy









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com