Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 11/11/2014 View Mon 11/10/2014 View Sun 11/09/2014 View Sat 11/08/2014 View Fri 11/07/2014 View Thu 11/06/2014 View Wed 11/05/2014
1
2014-11-11 Home Front: Culture Wars
Couple fined for refusing to host same-sex wedding on their farm
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Unavimp Cravitle2620 2014-11-11 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 Remember when private business was private? Yeah, me neither.
Posted by AlmostAnonuymous5839 2014-11-11 04:59||   2014-11-11 04:59|| Front Page Top

#2 The Schrute farm would do no less.
Posted by Shipman 2014-11-11 07:01||   2014-11-11 07:01|| Front Page Top

#3 Randy Weaver might think it too much painful irony.... Liberty Ridge Farm.
Posted by Besoeker 2014-11-11 07:04||   2014-11-11 07:04|| Front Page Top

#4 I am starting to think that gays are purposely picking on places that will say no. It is as if they are purposely shaking down those that disagree with them.
Posted by Airandee 2014-11-11 08:15||   2014-11-11 08:15|| Front Page Top

#5 That's a certainty, Airandee. Following the long-practiced model of the protected victim classes.
Posted by Glenmore 2014-11-11 08:48||   2014-11-11 08:48|| Front Page Top

#6 I sense an appeal in the works.
Posted by Korora  2014-11-11 09:51||   2014-11-11 09:51|| Front Page Top

#7 I sense a tar and feathering in the works.
Posted by DarthVader 2014-11-11 11:55||   2014-11-11 11:55|| Front Page Top

#8 "starting to think," Airandee?
Posted by Barbara 2014-11-11 12:55||   2014-11-11 12:55|| Front Page Top

#9 They could have just let the cows graze in the wedding area the week before the wedding. I suspect the next time that might be the plan.
Posted by rjschwarz 2014-11-11 14:47||   2014-11-11 14:47|| Front Page Top

#10 Any tarring and feathering (pole-riding optional) should include the judge, jury if there was one, and the prosecuting lawyer(s). Also any "lawmaker" that wrote or passed this nonsense. Otherwise, we can ALL kiss our freedoms goodbye.

May be time for a second Revolutionary war. Our government has become the enemy.
Posted by Old Patriot 2014-11-11 15:44||   2014-11-11 15:44|| Front Page Top

#11 If the farm was theirs then no problem.
If the land was held by a limited liability company then I think it's different.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2014-11-11 17:22||   2014-11-11 17:22|| Front Page Top

#12 Probably no judge or jury involved, just a bureaucrat and a regulation. And yes, their choice was deliberate.
Posted by OldSpook 2014-11-11 18:50||   2014-11-11 18:50|| Front Page Top

#13 I wonder will meat eaters be able to sue vegetarian restaurants?
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2014-11-11 19:47||   2014-11-11 19:47|| Front Page Top

23:51 CrazyFool
23:46 Thing From Snowy Mountain
23:40 Zenobia Floger6220
23:15 DarthVader
22:55 gorb
22:45 badanov
22:42 badanov
22:31 SteveS
22:23 JosephMendiola
22:15 gorb
22:09 JosephMendiola
22:07 JosephMendiola
22:05 trailing wife
22:05 JosephMendiola
22:04 Zenobia Floger6220
21:42 Ulunter Hitl3744
21:35 Lone Ranger
21:15 Andy Protector of the Ostrogoths2377
21:11 Andy Protector of the Ostrogoths2377
21:02 Snerens Tingle8360
20:54 JosephMendiola
20:48 Rambler in Virginia
20:34 DLR
19:51 Gluque Glavilet4102









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com