Article

2013-12-15 Government

NSA, CSS and DOD Cyber Command staying under one boss

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Pappy 2013-12-15 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views ] Top

#1 "While having a single chain of command for both CYBERCOM and the NSA does ensure a high level of coordination between the two..." Awesome. Glad we have a coordinated group grope between the arrogant and the incompetent unified under overweening "leadership".

Posted by Classical_Liberal 2013-12-15 01:12|| 2013-12-15 01:12|| Front Page Top

#2 Too many cooks spoil the.........

Posted by Besoeker 2013-12-15 06:01|| 2013-12-15 06:01|| Front Page Top

#3 Perhaps, but on the Kona Coast the great ptoemaine outbreak of 1779 was blamed on the opposite.

~~Yes: Too many soups spo~~

Posted by Shipman 2013-12-15 13:20|| 2013-12-15 13:20|| Front Page Top

#4 Glad we have a coordinated group grope between the arrogant and the incompetent unified under overweening "leadership".

So you're basically lumping together as all one gang the people doing domestic surveillance here, people doing military surveillance abroad, and the guys who wrote the stuxnet virus in hopes of stopping Iran from getting the bomb and starting the next holocaust.

If you don't like the leadership at the top write your senator about impeachment.

Posted by Thing From Snowy Mountain 2013-12-15 13:55|| 2013-12-15 13:55|| Front Page Top

#5 IT MISSION:

Databases, networks, applications are designed to meet goals and objectives. Normally those goals and objectives are determined by what the user/users want to use the system for. Usually a committee is selected to formulate how the system is to be used.

But, it is far easier for something like the Obama regime to keep under wraps goals, objectives and control for these systems by having one loyal person under the regime's command who is responsible for ALL systems. They also can use it for the needs of the regime, not for US security, military security, etc..

If the regime wants the data warehouse built to be able to drill the data from top down to provide certain types of information that constitutionally they should not be privy to, no one will know except the man who reports to the regime.

Posted by Guillibaldo McCoy1948 2013-12-15 17:46|| 2013-12-15 17:46|| Front Page Top

23:47 Skidmark
23:46 Skidmark
21:20 Rambler in Virginia
21:00 Frank G
20:41 swksvolFF
20:33 JosephMendiola
20:16 swksvolFF
20:12 Pappy
20:11 Silentbrick - Schlumberger Squishy Mud Division
20:09 JosephMendiola
20:05 KBK
20:05 Pappy
20:00 Old Patriot
19:51 Zenobia Floger6220
19:34 Old Patriot
19:31 Old Patriot
18:58 Frank G
18:51 Frank G
18:16 Mugsy Glink
18:14 3dc
18:02 JohnQC
17:59 JohnQC
17:56 SteveS
17:55 Spereting Tingle4064