Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 01/16/2013 View Tue 01/15/2013 View Mon 01/14/2013 View Sun 01/13/2013 View Sat 01/12/2013 View Fri 01/11/2013 View Thu 01/10/2013
1
2013-01-16 Home Front: WoT
US Judge: PA Can Cover Up Link To 2002 Terror Attack
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by trailing wife 2013-01-16 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [214 views ]  Top

#1 There ARE stupid Judges.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2013-01-16 06:11||   2013-01-16 06:11|| Front Page Top

#2 Leak it to the Web.
Posted by Pappy 2013-01-16 16:00||   2013-01-16 16:00|| Front Page Top

#3 "As is" IMO there is no reason for a US Fed Judge to allow such unless the US Govt-Agencies is linked to the incident andor Personages involved.

CIA, NSA, ...@etc role(s)???
Posted by JosephMendiola 2013-01-16 18:27||   2013-01-16 18:27|| Front Page Top

#4 IANAL, so this is just seat-of-the-pants. New Federal Rule of Evidence 502 states:

"(b) Inadvertent Disclosure. When made in a federal proceeding . . . the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in a federal or state proceeding if:

(1) the disclosure is inadvertent;

(2) the holder of the privilege or protection took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure; and

(3) the holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the error, including (if applicable) following Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (b)(5)(B)."

So it depends on how the memo got handed over; whether the court decided the bad guys "took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure"; and whether they quickly ("timely") notified the other side what had happened and demanded the memo back. And "timely" doesn't mean two months.

I'm pretty sure the handover was "inadvertent" just based on the content, but that doesn't cut any ice with a court (or shouldn't). There are fairly specific requirements as to what constitutes "inadvertent."

I'm pretty sure they'll appeal the ruling. I'd appeal it all the way to the Supreme Court before turning it over.
Posted by Barbara 2013-01-16 19:37||   2013-01-16 19:37|| Front Page Top

06:51 NJ car insurance
03:37 write my essay
01:54 buy essay online
00:42 share
22:54 buy custom term paper
22:16 earn online law degree
20:35 where to buy viagra online
19:59 cialis purchase
19:08 writing a paper
16:22 catholicandlovinit.com
15:28 custom essay
15:27 custom essay
13:18 impotence and high blood pressure
10:40 Accredited College Courses Online
09:40 buy cialis with no prescription
08:01 write my admissions essay
07:42 generic for levitra
06:24 original writing service
03:55 essay.com sites
02:48 best essay writing software
01:12 customessaywriters.net
00:04 online schools college
20:22 mymedsaccess.com
20:11 catholicandlovinit.com

Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
23.21.23.126


Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com