Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
#1 But the Romney campaign's desperate, clownish portrayal of Mr. Obama does this important debate a serious disservice.
there's serious beclowning going on, but it's not by the Romney campaign
Posted by Frank G 2012-09-22 10:56||
2012-09-22 10:56||
Front PageTop
#2 The fundamental difference is redistribution for a public good (e.g. building roads and bridges) and redistribution for private use (e.g. Solyndra loans and food stamps).
The former is a necessary evil. The latter is just plain old evil.
Posted by Iblis 2012-09-22 12:04||
2012-09-22 12:04||
Front PageTop
#3 It must be clownish. WAPO says so.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2012-09-22 12:35||
2012-09-22 12:35||
Front PageTop
#4 In a rather pale replay of 2008's Joe the Plumber spread-the-wealth debate, the GOP dredged up a 14-year-old video.
Question for the WaPo editorial board - has Obama ever disavowed that statement?
Posted by Raj 2012-09-22 14:38||
2012-09-22 14:38||
Front PageTop
#5 let the LA Times produce that Khalid Rashidi video they've hidden to protect Teh One. That's newer than 14 yrs, right
Posted by Frank G 2012-09-22 14:50||
2012-09-22 14:50||
Front PageTop
#6 Re-distribution of wealth; another name for vote-buying. "Walking-around money."
Posted by JohnQC 2012-09-22 14:57||
2012-09-22 14:57||
Front PageTop
#7 Ah, WaPo, famous for its movie schedule, real estate listings, and restaurant reviews.
Posted by Perfesser 2012-09-22 19:09||
2012-09-22 19:09||
Front PageTop
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
