Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 10/13/2011 View Wed 10/12/2011 View Tue 10/11/2011 View Mon 10/10/2011 View Sun 10/09/2011 View Sat 10/08/2011 View Fri 10/07/2011
1
2011-10-13 Home Front: Politix
Air Sea Battle: Politics blocks military-approved program bolstering U.S. forces in Asia
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Sherry 2011-10-13 11:25|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 Nothing like having a full-bore political operative as Secretary of Defense. /s
Posted by tipover 2011-10-13 11:51||   2011-10-13 11:51|| Front Page Top

#2 Compare and contrast to AirLand Battle doctrine developed under Reagan -- arguably, it allowed us to win the Cold War with minimal deaths by putting enough doubts into the minds of Soviet military leaders as to the probability of conventional forces victory in a Warsaw pact invasion of western Europe.

The Pacific requires naval power, lots of intelligence and counter-recon technology, as well as some remnants of the AirLand doctrine in that you go after logistics critical points, and destroy C3I systems to prevent the enemy from effective use of whatever forces they have.

Blocking this sort of doctrinal development decreases deterrence - and to do so in fear of "upsetting" the Chinese, well that practically invites aggression from them, especially in areas like the Spratleys, and the Yellow Sea and Sea of Japan, as well as various trade routes that run the area between Japan (and the US West Coast) and the middle east & east Africa.

Where is Cap Weinberg when you need him? Or for that matter, since these are Dems, where are the "Scoop Jackson" and "Sam Nunn" parts of the Dem party anymore?

Screw the Chinese and their getting upset. The Soviets got upset too, and as long as we had the courage to stay the course, it didn't matter.

Tp put China's concerns above our defense is treasonous. We should be defenestrating some of these people, not giving them veto control over our defense policy.
Posted by OldSpook 2011-10-13 15:53||   2011-10-13 15:53|| Front Page Top

23:59 Zhang Fei
23:55 Zhang Fei
23:48 CrazyFool
23:02 Pappy
22:45 Grunter
22:23 Procopius2k
22:22 newc
22:16 Procopius2k
22:13 newc
22:09 OldSpook
22:09 Old Patriot
21:59 Free Radical
21:47 Dale
21:47 Frank G
21:42 Frank G
21:35 Dale
21:28 Anonymoose
21:10 Bright Pebbles
21:05 tu3031
20:40 Frank G
20:35 Whiskey Mike
20:12 Procopius2k
20:00 OldSpook
19:57 OldSpook









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com