Article

2011-06-20 Afghanistan

Success Against Al Qaeda Depends on Success in Afghanistan

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Sherry 2011-06-20 11:05|| || Front Page|| [6 views ] Top

#1 The definition of success in Afghanistan is still lacking. The cessation of terrorism export from Afghanistan does not amount to success, since it can resume any time the madrassas stir up the gunnies.

Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2011-06-20 12:00|| 2011-06-20 12:00|| Front Page Top

#2 PEOPLE'S DAILY FORUM > US PENTAGON ASKS TO EXTEND SURGE UNTIL 2012, i.e. to just month before planned US troop withdrawals begin.

and

* SAME > AL-QAEDA'S ZAWAHIRI BIGGER THREAT THAN OSAMA!, as per Raymond Ibrahim, author of 2007 book "THE AL-QAEDA PRIMER".

Physician Ayman more covertly akin to DRS. MENGELE, MOREAU, or MORIARITY, etc. than Marcus Welby, MD or House.

ARTIC = Ibrahim believes that AYMAN ZAWAHIRI is primarily responsible for redirecting the Jihadists' terror attacks from the Middle East only to agz the USA in order to induce an "ALL-OR-NOTHING" MASS CONFLAGRATION = WAR BETWEEN THE US-WEST + ISLAMISTS.

IOW, ISLAMIST JIHAD = actually "ALL-OUT" = TOTAL WAR = WAR OF ANNIHILATION AGZ THE US-WEST, even iff US-World Diplomats + Medias, etc. refuse to describe or label it as such.

Ibrahim also denotes that to understand OSAMA'S PERSONAL, IDEO "WORLD VIEW", ONE MUST UNDERSTAND AYMAN'S POTENT INFLUENCES ON OSAMA.

Yeeeeuuuppp - I agree.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2011-06-20 22:06|| 2011-06-20 22:06|| Front Page Top

23:53 Water Modem
23:18 Skidmark
23:10 JosephMendiola
22:58 de Medici
22:57 Skidmark
22:56 Skidmark
22:53 trailing wife
22:49 swksvolFF
22:45 JosephMendiola
22:42 JosephMendiola
22:31 trailing wife
22:30 Pappy
22:29 swksvolFF
22:06 JosephMendiola
21:48 Dale
21:14 SteveS
21:04 SteveS
21:03 SteveS
21:01 Frank G
20:51 Nimble Spemble
20:41 dan
20:32 Charles
20:28 Charles
20:25 Charles