Article

2010-12-25 Home Front: Culture Wars

First Casualty: Army NG LTC Requests Relief From Squadron Command Over Homosexual Policy

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Anonymoose 2010-12-25 08:34|| || Front Page|| [2 views ] Top

#1 Lets see if the Army treats Christian beliefs with the respect they have treated the muzzies and kwanzaa and all other moonbat religions....

Point of order to the JAG types. Don't ask don't tell was a policy to ignore the UCMJ. As I understand it, the UCMJ regs about gays was never repealed, just ignored by policy. Is that reg still standing??? Did the repeal of don't as just re implement the old reg of it being against the rules??

Posted by 49 Pan 2010-12-25 11:29|| 2010-12-25 11:29|| Front Page Top

#2 a quarter of Americans in military service will resign
That's a feature, not a bug - to those who have been promoting the new law.

Posted by Glenmore 2010-12-25 11:44|| 2010-12-25 11:44|| Front Page Top

#3 If the military does in fact REQUIRE "sensitivity training" about the gay life style, they may (and should) have a mutiny on their hands. It is one thing to openly allow gay people to serve (a bad idea, in my opinion). It is a completely different thing to force people to accept homosexuality as a valid life style. Yet I think that sensitivity training will be the next logical step, at least in the minds of gay activists.

This means that if a Sergeant yells at a gay soldier who has f*cked up, even if it is not because the soldier is gay, but just because he screwed up, the gay soldier will go running to the command Sensitivity Officer to complain. And the Sergeant will get sent to more re-education sensitivity training.

Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2010-12-25 14:09|| 2010-12-25 14:09|| Front Page Top

#4 Does indeed say something about our..... "professional military" when a reservist LTC "bets his bars" while senior Pentagon officers (who have nothing to lose), look the other way in phueching silence. A POX on all of you political careerists 'yes men' and gutless wonders. You have been revealed at long last!

I salute you Colonel!

Posted by Besoeker 2010-12-25 14:22|| 2010-12-25 14:22|| Front Page Top

#5 I don't have a problem with homos*xuals in the service. I don't have a problem with them being able to be open about it.
I DO have a problem with forcing others to condone and even affirm their status. It will inevitably lead to just the sort of thing Rambler mentions.
I suspect that the soldiers (heck, even the Marines) in general would be accepting of openly gay colleagues - AFTER they proved themselves willing and able to stand up to the abuse that everyone else does, in some shape or fashion (weaklings, v*rgins, pick a topic.) But our wussified leadership will 'protect' them from that, and thus degrade the potential ability of the whole service. (Again, in the eyes of such 'leaders' that's a feature, not a bug.)

Posted by Glenmore 2010-12-25 14:46|| 2010-12-25 14:46|| Front Page Top

#6 "O TEMPORA! O MORES!

Posted by borgboy 2010-12-25 15:29|| 2010-12-25 15:29|| Front Page Top

23:56 Barbara Skolaut
23:16 JosephMendiola
23:14 JosephMendiola
23:04 JosephMendiola
22:55 JosephMendiola
22:54 Thing From Snowy Mountain
22:52 JosephMendiola
22:47 JosephMendiola
22:44 JosephMendiola
22:42 crosspatch
22:40 Frank G
22:28 JosephMendiola
22:12 JosephMendiola
21:59 pan
21:57 Dale
21:41 JosephMendiola
21:38 Fire and Ice
21:37 ryuge
21:24 Flapper Scourge of the Algonquins
21:23 Barbara Skolaut
21:11 ryuge
21:07 Frank G
21:04 Rhodesiafever
20:40 Frank G