Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 07/17/2010 View Fri 07/16/2010 View Thu 07/15/2010 View Wed 07/14/2010 View Tue 07/13/2010 View Mon 07/12/2010 View Sun 07/11/2010
1
2010-07-17 Home Front: Politix
ACLU Travel Alert for the State of Arizona - includes "Bust Card" to assist illegal aliens
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by gorb 2010-07-17 03:47|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 Attention whoring. That they called it a "racial profiling" law shows that their information is not directed to illegals, but to agitators.

Amusingly, the advice they give is standard to anyone stopped by the police. However, it is out of date, based on subsequent legal decisions.

When "rules" are established, the police automatically look for ways to obey the rules and still do their job. So they come up with all sorts of "tricks" that eventually have to be adjudicated as to whether they are proper or not.

For instance, when someone asks "Am I being detained?", they don't answer "yes" or "no", but "we'll see" or "maybe, based on your answers".

And your ability to *not* answer questions is inhibited if they have not arrested you. Just because information may not be admissible against you, because you have not been read your rights, it may be very admissible against the person sitting next to you.

There has even been a major court case in which someone gave incriminating evidence during arrest, so it was not admissible, but the police released him from arrest, then used the information to get incriminating evidence, then rearrested him. Since he was not under arrest when they used his information, it was admissible.
Posted by  Anonymoose 2010-07-17 11:14||   2010-07-17 11:14|| Front Page Top

#2 The Supreme Court has already ruled in Muehler, Darin v. Mena, Iris (03/22/2005).

The Court also concluded that the questioning of Mena about her immigration status also did not violate her 4th Amendment rights.
Posted by Procopius2k 2010-07-17 13:17||   2010-07-17 13:17|| Front Page Top

23:42 Cloud Banks
23:39 Asymmetrical Triangulation
23:32 hoss
23:18 gorb
23:18 chris
23:15 gorb
23:14 chris
23:10 chris
23:02 Barbara Skolaut
22:53  abu do you love
22:42 Asymmetrical Triangulation
22:33 Hellfish
22:09 crosspatch
22:07 Nimble Spemble
21:51 Procopius2k
21:46 Asymmetrical Triangulation
21:41 Rambler in Virginia
21:40 gorb
21:19 lex
20:47 Cloud Banks
20:46 Atomic Conspiracy
20:23 Jefferson
19:56 ryuge
19:45 Jack Salami









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com