Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 10/05/2009 View Sun 10/04/2009 View Sat 10/03/2009 View Fri 10/02/2009 View Thu 10/01/2009 View Wed 09/30/2009 View Tue 09/29/2009
1
2009-10-05 Home Front: Politix
Obama pushing public option behind closed doors
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by  2009-10-05 07:19|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 The national economy cannot provide top quality health care to everyone unless costs per unit care come down. It won't even be able to provide the current quality to the currently insured for long - aging baby boom is going to increase demand. I have seen little in the proposed Dem plans that addresses the real problem (unit cost) honestly. Rather, it looks like a way to ration care by bureaucracy (rather than the current method of rationing by ability to pay.) It will make health care more uniform, but poorer overall. And it will stifle advancements. The two proposals I have seen from outside the Dem plans that actually might address unit costs (tort reform and supply expansion) have been dismissed immediately.
Posted by Glenmore 2009-10-05 07:52||   2009-10-05 07:52|| Front Page Top

#2 Oh, and those who say the insurance companies are inhumane - even inhuman - are right. But I expect the far more massive government replacement will be a lot more inhumane and inhuman. NOTHING that big can work well. Especially monopolies. Including government monopolies.
Posted by Glenmore 2009-10-05 07:56||   2009-10-05 07:56|| Front Page Top

#3 This has nothing to do with insurance or health care and EVERYTHING to do with establishing huge bureaucratic agencies. It's Chicago style patronage at the national level.
Posted by Besoeker in Duitsland 2009-10-05 08:21||   2009-10-05 08:21|| Front Page Top

#4 That has Democratic leaders looking for ways to insert some form of the concept into a Senate bill without jeopardizing centrist support.

Tie a public option clause into a bill to send more troops to Afghanistan. That way when Republicans oppose it, they can accuse them of not supporting the troops.

Sounds like a 'behind-closed-doors' policy to me.
Posted by Woozle Uneter9007 2009-10-05 15:23||   2009-10-05 15:23|| Front Page Top

23:44 Cornsilk Blondie
23:40 Cornsilk Blondie
23:39 Cornsilk Blondie
23:26 Procopius2k
23:13 Old Patriot
23:08 Old Patriot
22:55 JohnQC
22:46 Old Patriot
22:39 Old Patriot
22:09 gorb
21:56 Whiskey Mike
21:51 3dc
21:37 girlthursday
21:31 Pappy
21:26 Pappy
21:13 Frank G
21:12 Frank G
21:08 Woozle Uneter9007
21:08 Pappy
20:53 Frank G
20:21 phil_b
20:16 Rex Mundi
20:06 JosephMendiola
20:03 JosephMendiola









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com