Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 09/16/2009 View Tue 09/15/2009 View Mon 09/14/2009 View Sun 09/13/2009 View Sat 09/12/2009 View Fri 09/11/2009 View Thu 09/10/2009
1
2009-09-16 Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Russia Gives Up Mass Army
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2009-09-16 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1  Russia seems to have already given up the goal of a massive population. "One more generation, and it's over" - Russian demotivation poster.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2009-09-16 00:05||   2009-09-16 00:05|| Front Page Top

#2 Given demographic trends, it may not be wise for them to have too much in the way of armaments when they are overtaken.

What does this mean for the future as far as their influence on the world stage? It doesn't seem like they would be so quick to give this up. If so, it may come down to "nuke/not nuke" threats when it comes to influence.
Posted by gorb 2009-09-16 00:13||   2009-09-16 00:13|| Front Page Top

#3 It's more like the Russians don't use half of this crap anyway. I mean, 20,000 tanks? If they gave the order now, how many of them could actually be crewed, drive out and fire a round?
Posted by gromky 2009-09-16 00:35||   2009-09-16 00:35|| Front Page Top

#4 2000?
Posted by tipover 2009-09-16 00:45||   2009-09-16 00:45|| Front Page Top

#5 It's more like the Russians don't use half of this crap anyway. I mean, 20,000 tanks? If they gave the order now, how many of them could actually be crewed, drive out and fire a round?

They only need 20,000 tank commanders. The rest are fillers. That's why Russian tanks have autoloaders.
Posted by badanov 2009-09-16 00:56|| http://www.freefirezone.org]">[http://www.freefirezone.org]  2009-09-16 00:56|| Front Page Top

#6 Red Storm Rising Setting, for a while
Posted by Oscar 2009-09-16 06:20||   2009-09-16 06:20|| Front Page Top

#7 A GRU spokesman said.......?
Posted by Besoeker 2009-09-16 07:39||   2009-09-16 07:39|| Front Page Top

#8 Badanov,

That's why Russian tanks have autoloaders.

Very true - but the autoloaders have a bad habit of trying to load crewmembers instead of ammo.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2009-09-16 10:00||   2009-09-16 10:00|| Front Page Top

#9 As I understand it, the Russian conscript army is a hell of abuse, rape, corruption, and malnutrition. This couldn't come too early.
Posted by Mitch H.">Mitch H.  2009-09-16 10:28|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]">[http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2009-09-16 10:28|| Front Page Top

#10 Buh-bye, Russia. It's been...well...interesting.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2009-09-16 12:08||   2009-09-16 12:08|| Front Page Top

#11 I think I would rather have a demoralized Russia in control of excess armaments than the despots they are selling everything off to, though.
Posted by Lumpy Elmoluck5091 2009-09-16 13:49||   2009-09-16 13:49|| Front Page Top

23:59 Sherry
23:58 abu do you love
23:43 Woozle Uneter9007
23:42 Anguper Hupomosing9418
23:22 Sherry
23:15 Cornsilk Blondie
23:14 AzCat
22:59 Woozle Uneter9007
22:52 Frank G
22:44 Glenmore
22:39 Woozle Uneter9007
22:37 49 Pan
22:35 phil_b
22:30 Woozle Uneter9007
22:18 Woozle Uneter9007
22:13 Thing From Snowy Mountain
22:07 Anguper Hupomosing9418
22:06 phil_b
22:06 Woozle Uneter9007
21:55 Mike N.
21:49 JosephMendiola
21:42 Rambler in Virginia
21:31 lotp
21:31 lotp









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com