Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 07/16/2009 View Wed 07/15/2009 View Tue 07/14/2009 View Mon 07/13/2009 View Sun 07/12/2009 View Sat 07/11/2009 View Fri 07/10/2009
1
2009-07-16 Home Front: Politix
Congressman and former admiral to challenge Specter for Democratic nod for Senate
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2009-07-16 10:30|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 Other than the three stars, he sounds like the same old Democratic face...
Posted by tu3031 2009-07-16 11:49||   2009-07-16 11:49|| Front Page Top

#2 It was Bush, he said, with the help of lawmakers such as Specter, who helped "derail" the economy. "

Just run his fellow Donk Congressman Barney Frank enunciating that there's nothing wrong with how Fannie Mae et al were being run by his stooge sycophant when this challenger talks about 'It's Bush's Fault'(tm). So, when is the Frank investigation starting Joe? /rhetorical question.
Posted by Procopius2k 2009-07-16 12:05||   2009-07-16 12:05|| Front Page Top

#3 Damnit Joe, stop complicating my primary choices! I *was* going to pull the lever for your not-Arlen ass, regardless of the campaign details. But lord, you seem bound and determined to make my decision problematic.
Posted by Mitch H.">Mitch H.  2009-07-16 13:01|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]">[http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2009-07-16 13:01|| Front Page Top

#4 In further addressing his reasons for making a Senate run, Sestak said, "The defining issue is being in it for others and not for yourself."

If that doesn’t prove this guy is just another lying douche bag I don’t know what does.
Posted by DepotGuy 2009-07-16 17:19||   2009-07-16 17:19|| Front Page Top

#5 I would have thought his expression of interest in running for the US Senate would have so sufficiently established his douchebag credentials as to not require further proofs.
Posted by Mitch H.">Mitch H.  2009-07-16 18:54|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]">[http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2009-07-16 18:54|| Front Page Top

23:54 trailing wife
23:34 KBK
23:21 James
22:38 Redneck Jim
22:30 Redneck Jim
22:23 Dale
22:19 Barbara Skolaut
22:17 Barbara Skolaut
22:16 Barbara Skolaut
22:14 Barbara Skolaut
22:13 Barbara Skolaut
22:05 Redneck Jim
22:03 Chief
22:02 Dale
21:57 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:55 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:24 Dale
20:54 Frank G
20:54 Waldemar Slainter9268
20:50 Waldemar Slainter9268
20:34 Nimble Spemble
20:31 Bright Pebbles
20:17 lotp
20:03 Lumpy Elmoluck5091









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com