Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 05/01/2009 View Thu 04/30/2009 View Wed 04/29/2009 View Tue 04/28/2009 View Mon 04/27/2009 View Sun 04/26/2009 View Sat 04/25/2009
1
2009-05-01 China-Japan-Koreas
US: No Economic Aid for North Korea
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2009-05-01 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 why should we give then AAID
Posted by rabid whitetail 2009-05-01 00:50||   2009-05-01 00:50|| Front Page Top

#2 Let them eat plutonium.
Posted by crosspatch 2009-05-01 01:09||   2009-05-01 01:09|| Front Page Top

#3 They survive on handouts just like Pakistan.Both do not deserve Western aid and blackmail is their negotiation tactic hence more nuclear testing coming up soon!
Posted by Paul2 2009-05-01 09:18||   2009-05-01 09:18|| Front Page Top

#4 A clue!!
Posted by mojo 2009-05-01 10:36||   2009-05-01 10:36|| Front Page Top

#5 Gosh, is it a new month already?
Posted by swksvolFF 2009-05-01 11:58||   2009-05-01 11:58|| Front Page Top

#6 i was also gonna ask why we keep giving AID too pakistan. The predato strikes can be carried out from Afghanistan as easy and thet would giveus a chance too drop a few more hellfires along the way
Posted by rabid whitetail 2009-05-01 14:07||   2009-05-01 14:07|| Front Page Top

#7 Let the Chicoms feed them.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2009-05-01 14:21||   2009-05-01 14:21|| Front Page Top

#8 i was also gonna ask why we keep giving AID too pakistan.

The bulk of our supplies go through their territory. Besides, we can't launch air strikes against the Pakistani Taliban without the Pakistani government's acquiescence - it's the reason our drones operate with impunity without being shot down in Pakistani airspace.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2009-05-01 17:45|| http://timurileng.blogspot.com]">[http://timurileng.blogspot.com]  2009-05-01 17:45|| Front Page Top

#9 In essence, you can consider the aid rent for the use of Pakistani land routes and airspace. We've handed to them less than $10b in total aid. An invasion of Pakistan to secure those routes would cost hundreds of billions, not to mention thousands of dead GI's.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2009-05-01 17:51|| http://timurileng.blogspot.com]">[http://timurileng.blogspot.com]  2009-05-01 17:51|| Front Page Top

#10 Ogabe criticized aid to Pakistan before being elected, and went as far as talking about an invasion. Now that he's in the hot seat, he is continuing the payments to Pakistan. Why? Because the alternative is much more expensive.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2009-05-01 17:53|| http://timurileng.blogspot.com]">[http://timurileng.blogspot.com]  2009-05-01 17:53|| Front Page Top

23:58 Mike N.
23:34 JosephMendiola
22:22 Pappy
21:51 Frank G
21:49 Frank G
21:44 GirlThursday
21:34 OldSpook
21:21 JosephMendiola
21:14 OldSpook
21:13 Alaska Paul
21:06 JosephMendiola
21:05 49 Pan
21:03 JosephMendiola
20:57 JosephMendiola
20:53 Besoeker
20:50 SteveS
20:48 Nimble Spemble
20:30 Frank G
20:29 Redneck Jim
20:25 Bright Pebbles the flatulent
20:23 Redneck Jim
20:23 Frank G
20:20 Frank G
20:19 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com