Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 08/29/2008 View Thu 08/28/2008 View Wed 08/27/2008 View Tue 08/26/2008 View Mon 08/25/2008 View Sun 08/24/2008 View Sat 08/23/2008
1
2008-08-29 Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Rooskies test Topol missile
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2008-08-29 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 ...Would this be the same Topol that they've successfully test-fired - IIRC - once , and now suddenly it works like a charm?
Can probably find it in the bargain aisle, right next to the Iranian 300 mph torpedo.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2008-08-29 06:37||   2008-08-29 06:37|| Front Page Top

#2 I think you mean the Bulava SLBM. This is the Topol-M ICBM.

video

The Topol-M has been tested a number of times. They are two or three deployed regiments.

This would appear to be a test of the Igla renetry vehicle for the Topol-M

2005 report in Washington Times


The missile booster fired for a shorter-than-usual duration in placing the dummy warhead and re-entry vehicle into space. The warhead then dropped down to a lower trajectory and was able to maneuver.

U.S. officials confirmed some characteristics of the new missile warhead based on an analysis of the Nov. 1 flight test, which was first reported earlier this month by several Russian news organizations.

Unlike current ballistic warheads that do not alter their flight paths sharply once they reach space, the new warhead can change course and range while traveling at speeds estimated at about 3 miles per second, the officials said.

Posted by john frum 2008-08-29 06:55||   2008-08-29 06:55|| Front Page Top

#3 The return of STALIN indeed.


Posted by Slats Glans2659 2008-08-29 07:03||   2008-08-29 07:03|| Front Page Top

#4 John,

You know, you are right - I did confuse the two. This is what happens when you try to do military analysis BEFORE you finish your coffee. Thanks.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2008-08-29 07:14||   2008-08-29 07:14|| Front Page Top

#5 "capable of devastating a 14-mile wide area"

Is this true? Seems that 14 miles is a bit of an overstatement for a weapon of that yield. Can the resident experts offer clarity?
Posted by mjhlaw">mjhlaw  2008-08-29 09:23||   2008-08-29 09:23|| Front Page Top

#6 Nuclear Weapon Effects Calculator
Posted by john frum 2008-08-29 11:20||   2008-08-29 11:20|| Front Page Top

#7 Topol?

Posted by OldSpook 2008-08-29 12:11||   2008-08-29 12:11|| Front Page Top

23:49 bigjim-ky
23:48 Barbara Skolaut
23:25 OldSpook
23:16 Omiting the Younger9947
23:16 Seafarious
23:13 OldSpook
23:12 Seafarious
23:12 OldSpook
23:08 JosephMendiola
22:55 JosephMendiola
22:43 Jolutch Mussolini7800
22:33 trailing wife
22:32 trailing wife
22:27 trailing wife
22:27 3dc
22:25 swksvolFF
22:25 JosephMendiola
22:23 swksvolFF
22:21 3dc
22:20 JosephMendiola
22:20 swksvolFF
22:12 JosephMendiola
22:10 JosephMendiola
22:02 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com