Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 08/15/2008 View Thu 08/14/2008 View Wed 08/13/2008 View Tue 08/12/2008 View Mon 08/11/2008 View Sun 08/10/2008 View Sat 08/09/2008
1
2008-08-15 India-Pakistan
We are fighting for Balochistan's liberation: Bugti
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2008-08-15 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 Are they not more or less on their own anyway? They have to travel 100 miles just to find something to blow up.
Posted by bigjim-ky 2008-08-15 09:26||   2008-08-15 09:26|| Front Page Top

#2 Balochistan also straddles across the Iranian border where the Balochi's are already in conflict. The question is will they be trouble to the rest of us when/if they get independence or are they the types that are unhappy if anyone in the world is smiling.
Posted by rjschwarz 2008-08-15 11:03||   2008-08-15 11:03|| Front Page Top

#3 The late Nawab Bugti said that he had no time for jihad: "Of what use is a god that requires me to fight his battles?".
I suspect the Balochis would run the place far better then the Paks.

Posted by john frum 2008-08-15 11:55||   2008-08-15 11:55|| Front Page Top

#4 am I gonna get slammed for saying thats one arrow we should keep in the quiver for a while? Lets give the new Paki govt a chance to show if they can do at least as well as Perv in fighting jihadis. Backing the breakup of Pakistan means basically conceding Punjab (if not also Sind) to the enemies of the US. We should certainly be ready to move if we need to(including liasing with elements in RAW who are undoubtedly in contact with the Baluchis), as baluchistan at least provides an alternate air route to Afghanistan (but not necessarily an ideal land route, AFAIK). But frankly, in the conditions where we would need it, Id think wed have higher priorities than Afghanistan anyway.
Posted by liberalhawk 2008-08-15 12:11||   2008-08-15 12:11|| Front Page Top

#5 Hmm. No apostrophes. Do you write for the NYT, LH?

/had to ask
Posted by PBMcL 2008-08-15 12:27||   2008-08-15 12:27|| Front Page Top

#6 I agree LiberalHawk. I think that is one reason we haven't exploited the iranian side of the Balochistan issue, because that would torque Pakistan while they are still an ally. An imperfect one but still an ally.
Posted by rjschwarz 2008-08-15 13:05||   2008-08-15 13:05|| Front Page Top

23:59 KBK
23:52 JosephMendiola
23:50 trailing wife
23:50 General_Comment
23:49 JosephMendiola
23:47 General_Comment
23:46 trailing wife
23:39 trailing wife
23:28 tu3031
23:28 Pappy
23:26 trailing wife
23:19 trailing wife
23:16 trailing wife
23:15 trailing daughter #1
23:15 JosephMendiola
23:14 Anonymoose
23:12 Besoeker
23:11 trailing daughter #1
23:08 Anonymoose
23:07 General_Comment
23:06 Betty Grating2215
23:05 Anonymoose
23:03 General_Comment
22:59 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com