Article

2008-04-11 -Lurid Crime Tales-

WA Supreme Court - Fasting Inmate Can't Refuse Force-Feeding

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Anonymoose 2008-04-11 10:08|| || Front Page|| [9 views ] Top

#1 So you lose your right to die when you are convicted of a felony in Washington? That's a curious consequence.

Posted by bigjim-ky 2008-04-11 10:21|| 2008-04-11 10:21|| Front Page Top

#2 See, you confuse principle with POWER. POWER does not require principle. Thus two inconsistent principles can be supported by our new Princes, Dukes, Counts, who but wear robes and are thus above the rest of us. They say so.

Posted by Procopius2k 2008-04-11 11:33|| 2008-04-11 11:33|| Front Page Top

#3 Background...

http://spokesmanreview.com/breaking/story.asp?ID=14493

Posted by tu3031 2008-04-11 12:40|| 2008-04-11 12:40|| Front Page Top

#4 If he could refuse, it wouldn't be force feeding, now would it?

Posted by Chief Running Gag">Chief Running Gag 2008-04-11 17:21|| 2008-04-11 17:21|| Front Page Top

#5 Hanging an anorexic is going to be just plain bad PR...

Posted by M. Murcek">M. Murcek 2008-04-11 21:32|| 2008-04-11 21:32|| Front Page Top

23:59 JosephMendiola
23:20 trailing wife
23:13 trailing wife
23:09 trailing wife
23:08 trailing wife
22:56 JosephMendiola
22:49 newc
22:48 Pappy
22:48 JosephMendiola
22:45 Menhadden Sleaper5840
22:43 Pappy
22:33 Frank G
22:31 badanov
22:18 RD
22:06 RD
21:59 M. Murcek
21:52 Rambler in California
21:50 Eric Jablow
21:47 M. Murcek
21:46 Eric Jablow
21:45 Rambler in California
21:43 M. Murcek
21:33 BA
21:32 M. Murcek