Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 10/20/2007 View Fri 10/19/2007 View Thu 10/18/2007 View Wed 10/17/2007 View Tue 10/16/2007 View Mon 10/15/2007 View Sun 10/14/2007
1
2007-10-20 Home Front: Politix
IED's Threaten America - Bush Blamed
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Bobby 2007-10-20 16:32|| || Front Page|| [10 views ]  Top

#1 but of course. If we closed Gitmo, this wouldn't happen
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-10-20 17:30||   2007-10-20 17:30|| Front Page Top

#2 The rule of marginality comes into play. That is, there is no effective way of stopping the use of explosive devices in the US. However, the threat they pose is insignificant.

Posted by Anonymoose 2007-10-20 17:42||   2007-10-20 17:42|| Front Page Top

#3 the threat they pose is insignificant

?????
Posted by gromgoru 2007-10-20 20:45||   2007-10-20 20:45|| Front Page Top

#4 #3 the threat they pose is insignificant
?????
Posted by: gromgoru


i.e.: "actually hasn't happened (yet), so we're saying/but downplaying/ it til we can pin a single American death at home on BushCo., then we'll wail away like a Canuck on a baby seal"
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-10-20 20:58||   2007-10-20 20:58|| Front Page Top

#5 The IED McVeigh used in Oklahoma City - was that Bush's fault?
Posted by Glenmore">Glenmore  2007-10-20 21:03||   2007-10-20 21:03|| Front Page Top

#6 I blew up some stuff here at home and abroad.. does that count agin BUSH?
Posted by Red Dawg">Red Dawg  2007-10-20 21:08||   2007-10-20 21:08|| Front Page Top

#7 #4 Frank G. I'm sure this is not was 'Moose (#2) meant.
Posted by gromgoru 2007-10-20 21:29||   2007-10-20 21:29|| Front Page Top

#8 g: the threat is real, I agree. However, any (right or left wing)nut with a pipebomb and clever triggering could do the same. It was apparent that:

a) they were paying valid and needed attention to the threat of importation of terror arms/people into doestic U.S.; and

b) they were prepping the ground to say "we told U so" should something happen;

c) all the while opposing any attempt at intelligence gathering via net/phones/profiling ...even while waiting to blame the Admin for failure to do so.

I call lying agenda/partisan-driven hijinx and all-aroiund ass-sucking MSM drivel

/rant
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-10-20 21:36||   2007-10-20 21:36|| Front Page Top

#9 WaPo, Frank. What didja expect?
Posted by Bobby 2007-10-20 21:38||   2007-10-20 21:38|| Front Page Top

#10 I'm 48 old enough to match my expectations to low performance. The WaPo never hesitates to meet my expectations
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-10-20 21:40||   2007-10-20 21:40|| Front Page Top

#11 I AM, however constantly surprised and pleased I don't own their stock by the New York Times, LOL
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-10-20 21:46||   2007-10-20 21:46|| Front Page Top

#12 Consider the economic costs.
Posted by gromgoru 2007-10-20 23:14||   2007-10-20 23:14|| Front Page Top

23:39 gromgoru
23:28 Barbara Skolaut
23:24 Barbara Skolaut
23:15 Zenster
23:14 gromgoru
23:09 mhw
23:06 Zenster
23:03 Pappy
23:03 Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)
22:57 mhw
22:46 Pappy
22:44 3dc
22:25 3dc
21:55 Frank G
21:54 Frank G
21:53 Zenster
21:49 Alaska Paul
21:47 Frank G
21:46 Frank G
21:44 mhw
21:43 Alaska Paul
21:40 Frank G
21:39 mhw
21:39 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com