Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 06/12/2007 View Mon 06/11/2007 View Sun 06/10/2007 View Sat 06/09/2007 View Fri 06/08/2007 View Thu 06/07/2007 View Wed 06/06/2007
1
2007-06-12 Home Front: Politix
Reid says U.S. strike on Iran would be destabilizing
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2007-06-12 08:57|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Hey, Harry, you're destabilizing but I don't see you goin anywhere...
Posted by tu3031 2007-06-12 12:00||   2007-06-12 12:00|| Front Page Top

#2 What I find interesting about this is that we are starting to see The Usual Suspects(TM) coming out from under their rocks to denounce an attack on Iran. What that says to me is that the fuse has already been lit for the attack on Iran.
Posted by Angaiger Tojo1904 2007-06-12 12:17||   2007-06-12 12:17|| Front Page Top

#3 Wouldn't that be the idea, Harry, to destabilize Iran? Unless you're suggesting the whole middle east is stable, now?

Or, we can continue to let them have their way with us, and everybody else. While that may be stabilizing, but it's hardly ideal.
Posted by Bobby 2007-06-12 12:48||   2007-06-12 12:48|| Front Page Top

#4 But an Iranian nuclear strike on Israel or US bases or Europe Wouldn't be destabilizing.

'cuz we deserve it or some bullshit.

Goddamn scum.
Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader  2007-06-12 12:49||   2007-06-12 12:49|| Front Page Top

#5 Oh, yeah. A destabilized cesspool, Fred - that'd be like the Great Gaza Sewage Tsunami.
Posted by Bobby 2007-06-12 12:49||   2007-06-12 12:49|| Front Page Top

#6 Tojo,

There was also a article about Kuwait stating they would not be part of any such attack. I thought the same thing when I read that.
Posted by BrerRabbit 2007-06-12 13:45||   2007-06-12 13:45|| Front Page Top

#7 Harry "We Lost" Reid is kinda shaky. You have to destabilize the enemy before you can win--but then winning scares Reid and doesn't fit into a good dhimmi way of thinking. Stick to the under- the-table land deals Harry and please STFU for once.
Posted by JohnQC 2007-06-12 13:56||   2007-06-12 13:56|| Front Page Top

#8 He advocated continued diplomatic efforts with Iran instead.

Isn't one definition of insanity doing something over and over again while expecting a different result? Just goes to show the term liberal looney is right on the mark.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2007-06-12 14:00||   2007-06-12 14:00|| Front Page Top

#9 BrerRabbit - yep. So true.

On a funny note: Kuwait stating they would not be part of any such attack

Considering that part of the world, it probably means that Kuwait is helping :-)
Posted by Angaiger Tojo1904 2007-06-12 14:09||   2007-06-12 14:09|| Front Page Top

#10 Admin: Isn't it about time to adopt a "dumbass" tag? There must be two or three stories just today that would merit it.
Posted by Anonymoose 2007-06-12 14:10||   2007-06-12 14:10|| Front Page Top

#11 Reid says U.S. strike on Iran would be destabilizing

Horseshit! Room temperature mullahs are incredibly "stable".

He advocated continued diplomatic efforts with Iran instead.

After all, it's been working so well for the Europeans. MORON! It's defeatist assholes like Reid that will lose us the war against Islam. I'm beginning to agree with fellow Rantburgers that the American left is our biggest obstacle in defeating Islam.
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-06-12 14:22||   2007-06-12 14:22|| Front Page Top

#12 Even the threat of bombing has the Ayatollahs squirming. What is it doing to Ayatollah haters in Iran? Let's do the surgical strikes, and let Iranians do the rest.
Posted by McZoid 2007-06-12 18:17||   2007-06-12 18:17|| Front Page Top

#13 Considering that part of the world, it probably means that Kuwait is helping :-)

Yep, excatal. Likely suppying the jet fuel.
Posted by Shipman">Shipman  2007-06-12 18:35||   2007-06-12 18:35|| Front Page Top

#14 It is obvious that the 'unstable' part is senator H. Reid, D-Searchlight. (Maybe he doesn't have real estate futures in Iran yet and is just buying time to close the deals....) Should be looking at glass futures though.
Posted by Phineter Thraviger 2007-06-12 19:12||   2007-06-12 19:12|| Front Page Top

23:51 trailing wife
23:45 bigjim-ky
23:44 trailing wife
23:44 bigjim-ky
23:39 trailing wife
23:32 Zenster
23:29 Zenster
23:07 Alaska Paul
23:02 trailing wife
22:57 trailing wife
22:56 Natural Law
22:52 Zenster
22:49 Pappy
22:45 trailing wife
22:36 trailing wife
22:33 Zenster
22:32 trailing wife
22:27 Pappy
22:23 badanov
22:10 airandee
21:41 Natural Law
21:28 Anonymoose
21:27 Angaiger Tojo1904
21:25 Natural Law









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com