Article

2007-04-27 Home Front: Politix

Polling data: majority supports full funding, opposes surrender date

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Mike 2007-04-27 14:37|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 P*ss on reidpelosi.

Posted by anymouse">anymouse 2007-04-27 15:35|| 2007-04-27 15:35|| Front Page Top

#2 As long as Harry has the MSM in his back pocket this poll will never see the light of day, except here on Rantburg and other blogs. The most revealing of all the numbers is 69% trust the military commanders more than MoC 18% to decide strategy in Iraq. But that is the number the talking heads need to shout to the rafters.

Posted by Jack is Back!">Jack is Back! 2007-04-27 16:14|| 2007-04-27 16:14|| Front Page Top

#3 The surrendercrats are only shooting themselves in the foot.

Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader 2007-04-27 16:15|| 2007-04-27 16:15|| Front Page Top

#4 They will not attack until after the next President is inagurated.

And then only if he is a Democrat. A first training instruction, as it were.

They will most likely lay off if a Republican is elected. A death by a thousand cuts is a much more logical and safer strategy from their point of view.

In either case I am not too worried about the immediate future. Long term .... I'm glad I am not young anymore. I think the future is going to suck.

Posted by kelly 2007-04-27 16:24|| 2007-04-27 16:24|| Front Page Top

#5 Oh, and one other thing of interest:

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

Occasionally someone hits the nail straight on the head! Following is the winning entry from an annual contest calling for the most appropriate definition of a contemporary term.

This year's term: Political Correctness.

"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by delusional,
illogical, liberal minority, and rapidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a
turd by the clean end"

Posted by Jack is Back!">Jack is Back! 2007-04-27 16:34|| 2007-04-27 16:34|| Front Page Top

#6 How about funding only for the military mission? Get rid of all the pork attached to the bill.

Posted by JohnQC 2007-04-27 18:37|| 2007-04-27 18:37|| Front Page Top

#7 That would make too much sense, John.

Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2007-04-27 18:57|| 2007-04-27 18:57|| Front Page Top

#8 WND.com > TERRORISTS ECSTATIC OVER DEM DEBATE - Paleos view debate as Hillary + other candidiates competing as to whom will withdraw from the ME + whom are guilty of suppor the Iraq invasion. Also holds debate as MOMENT OF GLORY for REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENTS IN THE ARAB WORLD AND FOR IRAQ RESISTANCE GROUPS. A DEM POTUS IN 2008 may be seen by many Muslims espec islamist Radicals + aligned Xtremists as a sign that the Amer people ARE GETTING TIRED.

Also in WND > JOSEPH FARAH > WHY DEMOCRACY DOESN'T WORK. Amers, personally = politically, love Govt-subsidized Welfarism too much. Would rather see USA dead than give up their freebies.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2007-04-27 23:01|| 2007-04-27 23:01|| Front Page Top

23:56 Zenster
23:54 Zenster
23:49 Frank G
23:45 FOTSGreg
23:45 Frank G
23:44 JosephMendiola
23:42 Zenster
23:36 Unomomble Guelph4369
23:35 Frank G
23:33 Glert de Medici4406
23:33 Uninens Big Foot5550
23:18 3dc
23:04 Frank G
23:04 Pappy
23:01 JosephMendiola
22:58 Frank G
22:55 3dc
22:54 Zenster
22:51 3dc
22:51 Frank G
22:46 Pappy
22:44 Zenster
22:43 Anonymoose
22:43 Pappy