Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 11/12/2006 View Sat 11/11/2006 View Fri 11/10/2006 View Thu 11/09/2006 View Wed 11/08/2006 View Tue 11/07/2006 View Mon 11/06/2006
1
2006-11-12 Home Front: Politix
Democrats say will push for Iraq withdrawal
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by FOTSGreg 2006-11-12 19:25|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 The American people voted to quit and the Democrats won't hesitate. They cut funding for the South Vietnamese, they'll cut the rug from the Iraqis. We're done in the ME for at least a decade - who in their right mind would trust us again?
Posted by Robjack">Robjack  2006-11-12 20:27||   2006-11-12 20:27|| Front Page Top

#2 Some one said in another Blog - we need to declare "we got rid of Hussein, we won, see ya later".
Posted by Annon 2006-11-12 20:37||   2006-11-12 20:37|| Front Page Top

#3 Democrats say will push for Iraq withdrawal voluntary U.S. self-defeat (just like in Vietnam) so the EUrocrats will say they like us - for 2 minutes.

There - fixed that for ya'.

The traitorous MSM and the Dems (but I repeat myself) are at it again still. They want to live in America while pretending to be European.

They bad-mouth the most wonderful country in the history of the world - the last, best hope of freedom in this world - but notice how none of them actually move to another country?

And yet, if the jihadis they're encouraging actually win, these clowns will some of the first to be beheaded.

Here's a free clue, assholes: No matter whether the crocodile eats you first or last, it will still eat you.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut  2006-11-12 20:53|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]  2006-11-12 20:53|| Front Page Top

#4 The American people voted to quit and the Democrats won't hesitate.

The American people don't know what they want.

Yes, they voted teh Republicans out. But one poll broadcast this weekend showed an overall 80% of voters asked had 'deep concerns' that the Democrats would cut and run in Iraq.

Go figure.
Posted by Pappy 2006-11-12 21:04||   2006-11-12 21:04|| Front Page Top

#5 The election was not about Iraq, polling says it's was the ecconomy. Just goes to show how people still believe the lies the MSM says. Best ecconomy in a long, long time, 4.5% unemployment rate, Wall Street at all time highs, yet people "think" it's bad because the MSM says so. The Election was not about Iraq, it was about Republican's who forgot who brought then to the dance and why.

The Dems should not be allowed to get away with this Viet Nam part two, stabbing the military in the back because Joe democrat no balls.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2006-11-12 21:24|| www.sockpuppetofdoom.com]">[www.sockpuppetofdoom.com]  2006-11-12 21:24|| Front Page Top

#6 The left should know there will be penalties for early withdrawal
Posted by badanov 2006-11-12 21:42|| http://www.freefirezone.org]">[http://www.freefirezone.org]  2006-11-12 21:42|| Front Page Top

#7 No, IMO the Amer people didn't vote to "quit" as much to punish the GOP for inconsistent = non-clarity of strategic ME agenda + NT/LT milpol objectives. The Amer people know that iff Andrew Jackson, Sherman-Grant, MacArthur, Patton or Chesty Puller, etal. was in charge IRAQ PER SE WOULD HAD BEEN SECURED LONG AGO. THE RADICS WOULD BE EITHER GONE, PACIFIED OR NEARLY ANNIHILATED + NO THREAT TO EITHER US MILFORS, US-LED US/ALLIED ADMIN OR NATIONAL-INTERNAT INTERESTS. THEY WANNA HEAR FROM OUR LEADERS WHAT IS DA LT PLAN(S)-AGENDA(S) BEYOND MERELY IRAQ + AFGHANISTAN, NOT MERELY THE NOW-AND-WHAT-CAME-BEFORE. The Dems will rail-and-rant against the injustice of the HS/Patriot ACt before doing everything ninja to empower + entrench Gummermint everywhere = anywhere = no where in Fascist/Hated Nazi = well-meaning but errorful Limited Communist-Totalitarian, world-mighty USSA = weak anti-sovereign SSR-USR, .................@America = Amerika/Amerikkka. STRENGTHEN GOVT + GOVT-CENTRIC SOCIALISM/GOVT-ISM AT HOME, WEAKEN AMER GEOPOL OVERSEAS for OWG where Amer's agenda is just one nation's agenda of many, and Amer is controlled by a community of world nations that weirdly, mysteriously, but only co-incidentally randomly ooopsies, is dominated by Russia-China, aka Commie Asia. The Commies + anti-US agendists defeat = destroy the USA-West wid out having to wage mutually destructive nuclear war + getting the USA-West to wilfully assist and destroy itself in return for nothing. BEAUTY OF ASYMMETRIC WARFARE = GENERATIONAL WARFARE > THE GREATEST HARM/DAMAGE IS ULTIMATELY WHAT THE STRONG NATION(S) DO TO THEMSELVES.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-11-12 21:50||   2006-11-12 21:50|| Front Page Top

#8 Re Joseph M: What he said! I would also add Bobby Lee, Stonewall Jackson, and Nathan Bedford Forrest to his short list...
Posted by borgboy 2006-11-12 22:34||   2006-11-12 22:34|| Front Page Top

#9 They bad-mouth the most wonderful country in the history of the world - the last, best hope of freedom in this world - but notice how none of them actually move to another country?

And yet, if the jihadis they're encouraging actually win, these clowns will some of the first to be beheaded.

Word Barbara.
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2006-11-12 22:55||   2006-11-12 22:55|| Front Page Top

#10 Yes, they voted teh Republicans out. But one poll broadcast this weekend showed an overall 80% of voters asked had 'deep concerns' that the Democrats would cut and run in Iraq.

Go figure.


Actually it's pretty easy to figure out. People were tired of the status quo. The point is to move forward, but you got stuck in the mud. Bush wouldn't let Rumsfeld go, because that would be perceived as an admission that not all is well in Iraq. But the people ain't dumb.

I bet you if the US was actually fighting the war in Iraq, the election outcome would've been different. What you're doing there now is more akin to peacekeeping (or the more popular term now, peacebuilding) and that ain't working. George Bush said so himself, US soldiers are for fighting wars, not keeping peace. He didn't listen to himself. The people voted accordingly.
Posted by C 2006-11-12 23:13||   2006-11-12 23:13|| Front Page Top

21:39 anonymous2u
17:32  BUSHISMORON
19:53 Hibjobol Abjub
19:56 Rasta
19:05 Hibjobol Abjub
19:01 Hibjobol Abjub
18:53 Hibjobol Abjub
18:44 Hibjobol Abjub
19:41 Rasta
19:38 Rasta
19:20 Rasta
18:14 Rasta
10:31 .com
09:21 Excalibur
10:27 Mick Dundee
23:53 Zenster
23:46 JosephMendiola
23:37 JosephMendiola
23:35 JosephMendiola
23:34 Crairong Omomotch6492
23:32 Crairong Omomotch6492
23:28 JosephMendiola
23:24 C
23:23 JosephMendiola









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com