Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 10/27/2006 View Thu 10/26/2006 View Wed 10/25/2006 View Tue 10/24/2006 View Mon 10/23/2006 View Sun 10/22/2006 View Sat 10/21/2006
1
2006-10-27 Home Front: WoT
StrategyPage: Calling Out the New York Times
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by ed 2006-10-27 07:59|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 TOO BAD......Advetisments at link screwed up the story
Posted by ARMYGUY 2006-10-27 08:12||   2006-10-27 08:12|| Front Page Top

#2 Yeah, I'm having the same problem. Text is overlapped by the ads.
Posted by Mark Z 2006-10-27 08:18||   2006-10-27 08:18|| Front Page Top

#3 Text: October 27, 2006: The U.S. Department of Defense is now taking its requests for corrections public through a website known as For the Record (located at http://www.defenselink.mil/home/dodupdate/index-b.html). Here, the Department of Defense is openly calling for corrections from major media outlets, and even noting when they refuse to publish letters to the editor.

The most recent was this past Tuesday, when the DOD published a letter, that the New York Times refused to run, which contained quotes from five generals (former CENTCOM commander Tommy Franks, current CENTCOM commander John Abizaid, MNF Commander George Casey, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Myers, as well as his successor, Peter Pace) that rebutted a New York Times editorial. This has been picked up by a number of bloggers who have been able to spread the Pentagon's rebuttal – and the efforts of the New York Times to sweep it under the rug –across the country.

The Defense Department has been dealing with a number of misleading stories. From Newsweek's misreporting of a Koran-flushing incident (caused by a detainee, not guards as reported by Newsweek), to claims of prisoner mistreatment (often without context, including one instance where a detainee spat on an interrogator), to a massive rewriting of an embedded reporter's report on the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment's efforts in Tal Afar, by editors of Time magazine, to the revelations about NSA efforts, the DOD has been barraged by numerous stories, many of which were followed by angry editorials.

The DOD is pushing back, not only putting out requests to correct the record (with the refusals published as well), but also citing stories of heroes that the media has failed to cover – usually two or three a week. Among these are accounts of those who have been awarded medals for battlefield bravery, like Navy Cross recipients Robert J. Mitchell Jr. and Bradley A. Kasal, as well as Silver Star recipients Juan M. Rubio, Sarun Sar, Jeremy Church, and Leigh Ann Hester. The DOD has also followed CENTCOM's lead in running pieces on what terrorists actually say – another item largely ignored by the mainstream media.

The Department of Defense is acting in an effort to avoid a repeat of the aftermath of the 1968 Tet Offensive. On the battlefield, American and South Vietnamese forces won a victory – effectively destroying the Viet Cong and crippling North Vietnamese forces in South Vietnam. However, media misreporting, including Walter Cronkite's famous mischaracterization of the war as a "stalemate", took away the victory that had been won on the battlefield. Such a scenario is less likely now, largely due to the presence of the internet (including blogs), talk radio, and other news networks – and the Department of Defense is taking advantage of alternative ways to get around the mainstream media. – Harold C. Hutchison (haroldc.hutchison@gmail.com)

Posted by Bobby 2006-10-27 08:41||   2006-10-27 08:41|| Front Page Top

#4 Full text:
October 27, 2006: The U.S. Department of Defense is now taking its requests for corrections public through a website known as For the Record (located at http://www.defenselink.mil/home/dodupdate/index-b.html).

Here, the Department of Defense is openly calling for corrections from major media outlets, and even noting when they refuse to publish letters to the editor.

The most recent was this past Tuesday, when the DOD published a letter, that the New York Times refused to run, which contained quotes from five generals (former CENTCOM commander Tommy Franks, current CENTCOM commander John Abizaid, MNF Commander George Casey, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Myers, as well as his successor, Peter Pace) that rebutted a New York Times editorial. This has been picked up by a number of bloggers who have been able to spread the Pentagon's rebuttal – and the efforts of the New York Times to sweep it under the rug – across the country.

The Defense Department has been dealing with a number of misleading stories. From Newsweek's misreporting of a Koran-flushing incident (caused by a detainee, not guards as reported by Newsweek), to claims of prisoner mistreatment (often without context, including one instance where a detainee spat on an interrogator), to a massive rewriting of an embedded reporter's report on the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment's efforts in Tal Afar, by editors of Time magazine, to the revelations about NSA efforts, the DOD has been barraged by numerous stories, many of which were followed by angry editorials.

The DOD is pushing back, not only putting out requests to correct the record (with the refusals published as well), but also citing stories of heroes that the media has failed to cover – usually two or three a week. Among these are accounts of those who have been awarded medals for battlefield bravery, like Navy Cross recipients Robert J. Mitchell Jr. and Bradley A. Kasal, as well as Silver Star recipients Juan M. Rubio, Sarun Sar, Jeremy Church, and Leigh Ann Hester. The DOD has also followed CENTCOM's lead in running pieces on what terrorists actually say – another item largely ignored by the mainstream media.

The Department of Defense is acting in an effort to avoid a repeat of the aftermath of the 1968 Tet Offensive. On the battlefield, American and South Vietnamese forces won a victory – effectively destroying the Viet Cong and crippling North Vietnamese forces in South Vietnam. However, media misreporting, including Walter Cronkite's famous mischaracterization of the war as a "stalemate", took away the victory that had been won on the battlefield. Such a scenario is less likely now, largely due to the presence of the internet (including blogs), talk radio, and other news networks – and the Department of Defense is taking advantage of alternative ways to get around the mainstream media.

– Harold C. Hutchison (haroldc.hutchison@gmail.com)

Funny, the same moonbats who fear unchecked government power are all for unchecked media power -- as if "independent journalists" who never leave the Green Zone are somehow inherently more reliable than the people running operations.

Refusing to print a letter from five generals in wartime: serious chutzpah.
Posted by exJAG 2006-10-27 09:09||   2006-10-27 09:09|| Front Page Top

#5 The link to the DOD Page should be disseminated far and wide! I've commented on this at my website, and promptly added a side-bar link to it. Muchas Gracias, ed!
Posted by Ptah">Ptah  2006-10-27 09:28|| http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]">[http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]  2006-10-27 09:28|| Front Page Top

#6 Thanks Ed, Bobby, and exJag for posting text.

This is good stuff.

Posted by Mark Z 2006-10-27 09:50||   2006-10-27 09:50|| Front Page Top

#7 WHAT ads? (Use Firefox w/adblock)
Works anywhere, it's free, and pages load faster.
Posted by Grick Unoluper8380 2006-10-27 10:44||   2006-10-27 10:44|| Front Page Top

#8 So you haven't seen Grace?

Your loss. :-)
Posted by .com 2006-10-27 10:45||   2006-10-27 10:45|| Front Page Top

#9 LOL .com.

Grick doesn't know there's a serious downside to Firefox/adblock.
Posted by Mark Z 2006-10-27 11:21||   2006-10-27 11:21|| Front Page Top

#10 This is the ONLY front where we were not fighting. Its something I've been chewing on GW Bush about for years now. Stand up and Speak Out dammit!

Why the hell has he NOT used "the Bully Pulpit" of Reagan and Roosevelt? Even Bubba Clinton took the megaphone that comes with the office of President - and did so effectively!

GW Bush's main failure has been the failure to realize that in the arena of politics, you must not only BE right, you must be SEEN as right. And Bush has failed miserably in that part of this job as leader of this nation.

Had he explained the need for secrecy and the treachery of the press, we'd have less of the idiocy surrounding the government intel programs.

Had he stood up weekly and corrected the press in its misreporting of Iraq, we'd not have the lies that have been heaped up to support the moonbats.

Had he trumpeted the economy and his tax cuts salutatory effects on it, we'd not have the continued unopposed drumbeat of negative reporting from the major media accepted as gospel

GW Bush - fantastic success in terms of his policies, miserable PR failure to tell the nation about them.

Clinton was able to get a lot of his pet projects passed over the objection of an Republican house. The Gipper was able to reach out to the American People and sell far tougher measures over the heads of the press and left wing congress. Bush has an R house and R senate that he can;t even get a budget or a border control bill through - or a large number of district court judges.

God how I miss Ronald Reagan
Posted by OldSpook 2006-10-27 11:28||   2006-10-27 11:28|| Front Page Top

#11 I agree the failure of both GWB administrations on the PR front is really surprizing; it's like they are not even trying to fight back, both re the domestic angle, and in regard to the WOT/WOI. And, yet, Karl Rove is supposed to be the PuppetMaster(Tm) of PR.
Posted by anonymous5089 2006-10-27 11:38||   2006-10-27 11:38|| Front Page Top

#12 Agreed they've blown the public argument.

OTOH, they have been SWAMPED with operational decisions and with crises in more places than get a lot of media focus (thank goodness). Iraq, Afghanistan, the UN, Lebanon, Iran, the horn of Africa, Chavez and goings on in South America ....

PLUS the CIA leaking classified info selectively to the NYT, hostile and misleading questioning at press conferences designed to trap Bush into saying things that can be used against him.

And ... underlying it all, the incredibly irresponsible, destructive and truly corrosive attempt by Gore and the left to portray the last two major elections as stolen.

AND ... the European governments stuffed with (ex?) radical leftists like Schroeder's cabinet, seething in their hatred of the US and seeing in Bush the epitome of everything they hate. Spewing the most vile contempt and ridicule at him as he tries to lead the West through its biggest crises in, arguably, centuries.

Given all that, I cut them a break. But I am grateful for Tony Snow and wish he had been in place 5 years ago!!!
Posted by lotp 2006-10-27 11:55||   2006-10-27 11:55|| Front Page Top

#13 OldSpook, judging by Bush's bill signing yesterday, he did not want to sign the fence bill, and it shows. I, for one, would like Bush to explain his exact position on the illegals issue.
Posted by wxjames 2006-10-27 11:58||   2006-10-27 11:58|| Front Page Top

#14 The Times won't care. They're probably all too busy this morning nursing their hangovers fron their "Most American KIA's in a Month" party...
Posted by tu3031 2006-10-27 11:59||   2006-10-27 11:59|| Front Page Top

#15 It helps to have the MSM on your side and to be on the MSM's side, as Clinton always tried to be. Bush has recognized that if he makes the tough decisions and takes a stand, the MSM is his incontrovertible enemy. He saves his MSM chips for when he needs them, right before elections. If he were trying to get the kind of exposure for his message that he has gotten for the last month all the time, he would be completely ignored at the all important election time. So he's had to make the strategic decision to focus media offensives at the times when they can make a difference. He who defends everything defends nothing.

Having the domestic press as an enemy is a huge problem for any leader who chooses to conduct a war or make hard policy choices. No question Bush is not a great communicator. But even the Gipper had things pretty rough, especially in his second term. That's why he had to sign a tax increase.

DoD has really missed a beat in failing to use the internet to get its message out for today's generation. This DoD update is a good start, but is updated too infrequently and doesn't have the edge things need on the internet. It's not coordinated with what Tony Snow is doing, which has the same flaws. Maybe DoD can't really do it directly. But they should be feeding more stories to bloggers and other disseminators who can get the message out more effectively.

This problem will not go away, no matter who is elected in 2008 unless we either pull out or suffer the kind of devastating attack that puts the whole nation in a post Pearl Harbor mentality. And remember that post PH we still didn't declare war on Germany, Germany delclared war on us. The American people just don't like going to war. And solving that problem is the key to winning a war that we will win. The only question is how much it costs. And right now, just like with Social Secuirty, every one wants to ignore the problem thinking they can reduce their pain by postponing it, when the opposite is the truth.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-10-27 12:05||   2006-10-27 12:05|| Front Page Top

#16 Its not just the local bully pulpit.

We hear reports all the time about the 'Insurgents' (aka Freedom Fighter to Ted and Co) using human shields. Why haven't we seen any videos of it? I know it would be hard to get a video in a combat situation but a video of a 'freedom fighter' hiding behind a woman or child will end this 'freedom fighter' bullshit in its tracks and help to shut Ted and Murtha and Cindy up.

So far we aren't even fighting this war in the media - we are giving up almost every 'media' battlefield unfought. Why?
Posted by CrazyFool 2006-10-27 12:22||   2006-10-27 12:22|| Front Page Top

#17 So far we aren't even fighting this war in the media - we are giving up almost every 'media' battlefield unfought. Why?

It's almost like a studied ignorance. Makes me wonder sometimes if the resulting discord is part of a hidden strategy because nobody's that stupid. These people use PR all over the place whenever there's an election to be won, then they forget how it works? BS*10e6.
Posted by gorb 2006-10-27 13:21||   2006-10-27 13:21|| Front Page Top

15:24 Glusing Shaviling8913
15:22 Glusing Shaviling8913
16:13 Zenster
12:49 Sneagum Cloger4187
23:59 .com
23:57 Zenster
23:55 Zenster
23:52 Thermos
23:52 Zenster
23:50 .com
23:47 Zenster
23:42 Zenster
23:39 Zenster
23:36 Zenster
23:32 Zenster
23:28 Old Patriot
23:21 twobyfour
23:15 .com
23:14 .com
23:13 trailing wife
23:10 Zenster
23:09 trailing wife
23:04 trailing wife
23:03 JAB









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com