Article

2006-09-28 Home Front: WoT

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Super Hose 2006-09-28 01:41|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Who's this Judge Lodge? I don't see his legal logic here. But then I don't see the Supreme Court's legal logic on the M-F Incumbent Protection Act either. I guess I must be the one with a reading comprehension problem.

Posted by Glenmore">Glenmore 2006-09-28 07:20|| 2006-09-28 07:20|| Front Page Top

#2 I see the logic. I'd like to see the same thing happen to the prosecutor persecuting Rush or DeLay or the Duke Lax team. Prosecutors make mistakes. Sometimes they are human error and sometimes they are malicious witch hunts. The witch hunters should not go unpunished. Was Ashcroft being a witch hunter in this case? Beats me, but I don't object to a trial to find out if the judge has seen enough evidence to proceed with one.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-09-28 07:25|| 2006-09-28 07:25|| Front Page Top

23:37 Zenster
23:32 JosephMendiola
23:29 gorb
23:23 Zenster
23:20 Mike
23:19 gorb
23:19 Zenster
23:17 DMFD
23:15 gorb
23:15 Mike
23:09 Zenster
23:03 Ol Dirty American
23:03 Zenster
23:00 Captain America
22:59 gorb
22:59 Zenster
22:59 Pappy
22:59 Classical_Liberal
22:55 gromgoru
22:54 Super Hose
22:50 gromgoru
22:49 Zenster
22:47 Frank G
22:46 gromgoru