Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 09/19/2006 View Mon 09/18/2006 View Sun 09/17/2006 View Sat 09/16/2006 View Fri 09/15/2006 View Thu 09/14/2006 View Wed 09/13/2006
1
2006-09-19 Home Front: Politix
Open your Diebold AccuVote-TS with a minibar key
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2006-09-19 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Something so important as an electronic voting machine should have its own special and unique keyed lock, unlike any other mechanism in the industry. This is incompetence writ large.
Posted by Zenster 2006-09-19 04:06||   2006-09-19 04:06|| Front Page Top

#2 How about a big magnet?
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-09-19 06:54||   2006-09-19 06:54|| Front Page Top

#3 Only allowed in big (read Democratic) cities, NS.
Posted by Bobby 2006-09-19 07:05||   2006-09-19 07:05|| Front Page Top

#4 Paper with an ink print box for your finger mark for future Washington State authentication requirements. Let's go for the middle index finger for the marker.
Posted by Snineger Spavitle5395 2006-09-19 09:17||   2006-09-19 09:17|| Front Page Top

#5 As any tech person will tell you: “One you have procession all bets are off.” I bet there are a multitude of implements that will open a Diebold machine. I would also concede that there are many MANY ways to reprogram the machine to count votes in a funny manner. Prior to the machines it would have been all too easy (See San Francisco, Chicago, et al) to stuff paper ballots with the “proper” votes. Also without having to produce an ID in some states a person can vote multiple times in different precincts. But wasn’t it the LLL Mo0b@+5 that whined about not having these machines after the 2000 elections? I have come to the conclusion that since their (Democrats) ability to cheat has diminished, and they are losing elections, maybe they are trying to turn back the clock so they can cheat and win again?
Posted by Cyber Sarge 2006-09-19 11:10||   2006-09-19 11:10|| Front Page Top

#6 The whole thing about fraud with these machines is bogus.

When I was living in Connecticut, we were using lever operated gear driven voting machines. They were 50+ years old and they hadn't even made spare parts for 20 years. Occasionally the gears would slip and your vote would be changed and there would be no record of it.

Nobody complained about that. Instead they complained about hanging chads in Florida in a system that wasn't broken.

You can tamper and reprogram these computerized machines, but there will be a record left behind. If the the code is altered, the load module will be slightly different than the baseline, and you can immediately tell which machines were affected.

I do think we should create a hard copy of the votes, so we can recreate the correct result with the unaltered software.

Al
Posted by Frozen Al">Frozen Al  2006-09-19 14:49||   2006-09-19 14:49|| Front Page Top

20:01 Fun Dung Poo
15:50 Goopta
15:33 goopta
15:25 goopta
15:13 goopta
14:55 goopta
14:45 goopta
23:56 Zenster
23:56 trailing wife
23:54 Zenster
23:49 Zenster
23:42 Snuns Thromp1484
23:38 mcsegeek1
23:37 Alaska Paul
23:34 3dc
23:27 GK
23:27 3dc
23:11 trailing wife
23:11 Thoth
23:10 Thoth
23:09 Thoth
23:07 Alaska Paul
23:05 Barbara Skolaut
22:56 anonymous2u









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com