Article

2006-04-11 Great White North

Canadian Troops May Be 'Subject to War Crimes Charges' in ICC

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by lotp 2006-04-11 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Future generations, or the 1.2Bilyuhn or less that survive, to includ 100Milyuhn or less Americans, must be saved and protected from the damnable, sheer unmitigated horrors of Christina and Glaze-gate. ITS FOR THE CHILDREN, D*** YOU!?

Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-04-11 00:37|| 2006-04-11 00:37|| Front Page Top

#2 Oops.

Posted by badanov 2006-04-11 02:53|| http://www.freefirezone.org/cgi-bin/index.pl]">[http://www.freefirezone.org/cgi-bin/index.pl] 2006-04-11 02:53|| Front Page Top

#3 Future generations, or the 1.2Bilyuhn or less that survive, to includ 100Milyuhn or less Americans, must be saved and protected from the damnable, sheer unmitigated horrors of Christina and Glaze-gate. ITS FOR THE CHILDREN, D*** YOU!?

Archived into the Classic CrossOver Files.

Posted by RD 2006-04-11 04:03|| 2006-04-11 04:03|| Front Page Top

#4 1) Thre is NO international law. Laws are thingies who are voted by the ELECTED represntives of the people.

2) The name you are trying to find is treaties and ac cording to the Geneva convedntion irregumlars are NOT protected be it aginst summary execution or torture

3) The only people who may nbe subject to War crimes charges are the jihadists.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2006-04-11 08:25|| 2006-04-11 08:25|| Front Page Top

#5 3) The only people who may nbe subject to War crimes charges are the jihadists.

No, no, no, JFM, you don't understand, you don't understand at all! What are you, some kind of weirdo who thinks common sense and morality should rule the day? Next thing, you'll say that the Un should interverne in Sudan, if it had any decency, or something.

The only people who may be subject to war crimes charges are troops and officials from western armies and gvt.
To the Enlightened Elites, the only goal of the "international law" (scare quotes as explained by you) is to entangle the Nation-States and their actions, not to concern itself with such petty matters as actual war crimes (except when they're comitted by an unfashionable, IE white and rightwing/nationalist, dictator).
This is transnational progressism in action, here.

Posted by anonymous5089 2006-04-11 08:39|| 2006-04-11 08:39|| Front Page Top

#6 "International Law"

What a joke. Who's going to enforce that so-called law, Belguim?

If you don't have the wherewithall to enforce a law, you effectively ain't got a law.

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2006-04-11 14:41|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html] 2006-04-11 14:41|| Front Page Top

#7 Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor said last week he is satisfied with the pact and noted it met international law standards.

I first read this as "international low standards".

Posted by Angie Schultz 2006-04-11 21:35|| 2006-04-11 21:35|| Front Page Top

23:52 JosephMendiola
23:42 JosephMendiola
23:40 Frank G
23:32 JosephMendiola
23:26 JosephMendiola
23:21 2b
23:21 3dc
23:19 Frank G
23:17 Desert Blondie
23:08 jim#6
22:58 jim#6
22:53 Alaska Paul
22:53 2b
22:51 DMDF
22:42 2b
22:41 JosephMendiola
22:39 DMDF
22:31 2b
22:25 Asymmetrical Triangulation
22:24 DMDF
22:22 JosephMendiola
22:17 JosephMendiola
22:03 Nimble Spemble
22:02 anon