Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 12/02/2005 View Thu 12/01/2005 View Wed 11/30/2005 View Tue 11/29/2005 View Mon 11/28/2005 View Sun 11/27/2005 View Sat 11/26/2005
1
2005-12-02 India-Pakistan
StrategyPage Pakistan: Making Sure No Good Deed Goes Unpunished
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by ed 2005-12-02 09:17|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 With a little cooperation from the media, this disaster can be blamed on the Western relief effort.

Yeah, but what are the odds the media will go along with the lie? No more than, what, 99.999999% chance they'll spread jihadist lies?
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2005-12-02 09:44|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-12-02 09:44|| Front Page Top

#2 Last night one of the late network news programs said the death toll might be as high as 300,000, but no one knows the real number because of the remoteness and lack of communication.
Posted by ed 2005-12-02 10:22||   2005-12-02 10:22|| Front Page Top

#3 The other article I posted sez NATO's official mission runs out in February and won't be renewed. By any reckoning it's still plenty cold and snowy in Kashmir until sometime in late April, when it becomes time to slink back down the mountain and resume killing the heathen Hindoo.
Posted by Seafarious">Seafarious  2005-12-02 10:28||   2005-12-02 10:28|| Front Page Top

#4 One can get away with insisting that if the Western relief organizations had “done more,” then people in northern Pakistan would not be dying in large numbers from the cold weather.

Well then, had Western relief orgs done nothing at all, they'd be blameless, right? RIGHT?
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2005-12-02 10:36||   2005-12-02 10:36|| Front Page Top

#5 Last night one of the late network news programs said the death toll might be as high as 300,000, but no one knows the real number because of the remoteness and lack of communication.

Like when the town of Beaver Dam was flooded, leading to the deaths of millions. "No, we have no information on that, it's just what we're reporting."

(South Park, natch.)
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2005-12-02 10:37|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-12-02 10:37|| Front Page Top

#6 Who knows Robert. But do you have confidence that the 70-80,000 reported is complete and accurate? Helicopters are still ferrying wounded from remote villages and many have yet to be visited.
Posted by ed 2005-12-02 10:51||   2005-12-02 10:51|| Front Page Top

#7 it would be interesting to know the number who survived the quake but died because they were fasting during the daytime and couldn't find infidel food after sunset
Posted by mhw 2005-12-02 10:58||   2005-12-02 10:58|| Front Page Top

#8 Not to mention all the wimmen-folk who have been forced to remain behind at deathly frozen high altitudes so as to avoid being leered at by us infidels while their courageous warrior men filter down to warmer climes and pick up free aid parcels.
Posted by Zenster 2005-12-02 12:32||   2005-12-02 12:32|| Front Page Top

23:34 CrazyFool
23:16 Old Patriot
23:00 Black Powa!
22:49 DMFD
22:44 AzCat
22:43 Frank G
22:13 jules 2
21:59 2b
21:50 2b
21:35 JosephMendiola
21:32 2b
21:29 Seafarious
21:26 JosephMendiola
21:23 JosephMendiola
21:19 JosephMendiola
21:16 JerseyMike
21:13 3dc
21:07 Frank G
21:03 lotp
21:02 Red Dog
20:54 49 pan
20:44 BangkokBilly
20:20 49 pan
20:18 mjslack









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com