Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 09/28/2005 View Tue 09/27/2005 View Mon 09/26/2005 View Sun 09/25/2005 View Sat 09/24/2005 View Fri 09/23/2005 View Thu 09/22/2005
1
2005-09-28 Home Front: Tech
More on American Naval Infantry
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2005-09-28 09:47|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 As a good friend, a retired Navy captain says, the Navy will do whatever it takes to get money....
Posted by RWV 2005-09-28 10:05||   2005-09-28 10:05|| Front Page Top

#2 My dad was a Seabee, circa 1942 - 45.

His favorite saying was "The Marines marched into Tokyo on the roads the Seabees built."

The only story I could get out of him on the topic of WWII was re-building a runway on some island (Tinian I think) before the Marines finished taking the other end of it.
Posted by AlanC">AlanC  2005-09-28 10:31||   2005-09-28 10:31|| Front Page Top

#3 It's articles like this, that truly make me doubt Strategy Page's bona fides.

The Navy's MAA force has about as much light infantry capability as the Army has experience with carrier aviation. Periodically training with M-16s does not light infantry make.

The Navy foolishly allowed the riverine mission to escape to the Army and is now playing catch up trying to make itself relevant in the GWOT.
Posted by Dreadnought 2005-09-28 10:46||   2005-09-28 10:46|| Front Page Top

#4 If we had had naval infantry in WWII we could have taken Guadalcanal and Iwo Jima.
Posted by Matt 2005-09-28 12:27||   2005-09-28 12:27|| Front Page Top

#5 I thought the naval infantry branch went by the name "Marines."
Posted by Mike 2005-09-28 12:38||   2005-09-28 12:38|| Front Page Top

#6 This seems a page from WWII Japanese ship based SNLFs. where in some islands a couple of ships will draw some mens to take a remote island. Or make some temporary land operation.
Posted by Hupomoque Spoluter7949 2005-09-28 13:16||   2005-09-28 13:16|| Front Page Top

#7 John Garfield used to do this in all those submarine movies.
Posted by tu3031 2005-09-28 13:30||   2005-09-28 13:30|| Front Page Top

#8 #5: I thought the naval infantry branch went by the name "Marines."
Damn, beat me to it.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2005-09-28 13:58||   2005-09-28 13:58|| Front Page Top

#9 This opens big logic doors for an integral USAF Armourmed Cavalry Regiment.

WSC: RAF Regiment? Pansies.
Posted by Shipman 2005-09-28 18:58||   2005-09-28 18:58|| Front Page Top

#10 The Marines have long been part of the Department of the Navy - the Men's Department ! Come on - MAA's in hand to hand ? The only ones I've seen where overweight CPOs on shore patrol with 1930's Chicago PD billy clubs. The SeaBees kick ass and are to a man/woman some of the Navy's best - with a torque wrench and a cutting torch. I don't think their strong suit is light infantry.
Posted by BangkokBilly 2005-09-28 19:07||   2005-09-28 19:07|| Front Page Top

#11 Hospital Corpsmen serving with the Marine Corps – “Green” in Navy parlance – receive infantry training for defensive combat.

Defensive combat?? - No, the way I remember it was that we were trained for offensive combat. My instructor said words to the effect - "When all the officers are dead, all the NCO's are dead, the enemy has you surrounded and you are out of ammunition, the senior PFC alive shall order "fix bayonets and charge".

He meant it.
Posted by Doc8404 2005-09-28 19:40||   2005-09-28 19:40|| Front Page Top

#12 I thought the naval infantry branch went by the name "Marines."

See this Strategypage article.

The Marines got so large due to World War II that it was no longer an adjunct to the Navy, but became a separate entity.

The Navy for its part, stopped using Marines for ship and base security (going to both DoD and civilian security contractors). Sailors also used to be trained in some infantry methods for boarding parties, landing parties, and temporary security detachments. That stopped in the '60s and early '70s.

One can thank the 'blue-water' and aviation factions for the decline in the Navy's riverine and littoral warfare assets and experience.
Posted by Pappy 2005-09-28 22:53||   2005-09-28 22:53|| Front Page Top

23:55 Blitzen
23:53 3dc
23:51 Jackal
23:34 Paul Moloney
23:28 jules 2
23:20 Fun Dung Poo
23:14 dwwaag
23:11 Bomb-a-rama
23:10 BH
23:08 Bomb-a-rama
23:07 MunkarKat
23:03 Pappy
23:02 Bomb-a-rama
22:55 Bomb-a-rama
22:53 Pappy
22:52 Bomb-a-rama
22:49 Bomb-a-rama
22:48 rjschwarz
22:46 moonbeam
22:24 DMFD
22:08 Snoluns Hupatch6252
21:58 Biff Wellington
21:50 Bardo
21:48 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com