Article

2005-09-09 Down Under

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2005-09-09 00:22|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Of all the stupid conspiracy theories, this has got to take the cake. The whole danged world saw planes go into the twin towers so why waste your energy trying to say it was a missile that hit the pentagon? If you're gonna weave dark tales of fiendish plots, at least show a little creativity and respect for narrative consistency and say that the planes were remotely guided or that the hijackers were in cohoots with Halliburton or whatever.
Thank Allah people like Sheik Omran are stupid, otherwise they might pose more of a threat.

Posted by Abd Al-Sabour Shahin 2005-09-09 05:57|| 2005-09-09 05:57|| Front Page Top

#2 Out of misplaced national pride, I might add that IIRC the "pentagon missile" theory was first given by our dear Thierry Meyssan in his book "Le Pentagate" (which I didn't read), after some skeptics debunked his truckbomb theory in "L'effroyable mensonge" (the grand matrix of 9/11 conspiracy theories, which I read, and found very light and unconvincing, being for example in part an internet-based "research").

Posted by anonymous5089 2005-09-09 06:14|| 2005-09-09 06:14|| Front Page Top

#3 Sheikh Omran will find it difficult to convince John Howard that a plane did not crash into the Pentagon on 9-11-01. John Howard was in Washington at the time.

Posted by Grunter 2005-09-09 07:39|| 2005-09-09 07:39|| Front Page Top

#4 "If all society agrees on something, that is very unhealthy," he said.

That whole "sun rises in the east" thing is a cancer on society, don'tchaknow.

Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford 2005-09-09 09:14|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/] 2005-09-09 09:14|| Front Page Top

#5 Who was responsible for 9/11? You mean, you think it wasn't the genocidal Saudis that crashed the planes into civilian targets? How do you figure that?

Wow, I'm ashamed to be living in the same country as a nutjob like this.

Posted by Nicholas 2005-09-09 09:26|| 2005-09-09 09:26|| Front Page Top

#6 Another great moment in islamic thought brought to you by yet another Sheikh McNutjob. If he was going to cook up a lie to believe for the ummah at least he could make half an effort to be creative. Then again the target audience is easy to please.

Posted by MunkarKat 2005-09-09 09:43|| 2005-09-09 09:43|| Front Page Top

#7 Bruise easily, do ya?

Posted by Seafarious">Seafarious 2005-09-09 12:07|| 2005-09-09 12:07|| Front Page Top

#8 The newspaper, called Mecca News, then promises that "in future editions we will uncover the rest of the questions which surround 9/11".

I, for one, look forward to this ground breaking piece of investigative journalism...

Posted by tu3031 2005-09-09 12:09|| 2005-09-09 12:09|| Front Page Top

#9 As do I, tu, but don't hold your breath.

Can somebody hook this guy up with the one claiming Katrina was punishment for Gaza? Lock 'em in a room together with a soup spoon and a plastic knife for each of 'em?

Posted by Bobby 2005-09-09 13:20|| 2005-09-09 13:20|| Front Page Top

#10 Hey, Munkarkat, leave the Scots out of it. We've already got our own home-grown Jihadi appologist in Galloway.

Posted by The Royal Stewart">The Royal Stewart 2005-09-09 13:27|| 2005-09-09 13:27|| Front Page Top

#11 Apologies extended generously and generally inarticulate, I was actually thinking McDonald's (big yellow arches) McShake rather than Scots. Galloway's an accomplished apologist I'll grant you but the lack of a zz top beard makes him a second rater at best though he's got a little flourish of the muddlebrain poetic prose in him.

Posted by MunkarKat (Kin of King Abner Stolfus) 2005-09-09 16:28|| 2005-09-09 16:28|| Front Page Top

#12 I guess it depends on your definition of "good." And your definition of "Muslims," since one of the boomers appeared on tape with Ayman. But it probably depends on your defintion of "Ayman," as well...

Uh, yes, and don't forget it depends on your definition of "is," too. I mean, what is is?

Posted by William Jefferson Clinton (no kin to George Clinton of the P-funk All stars) 2005-09-09 18:39|| 2005-09-09 18:39|| Front Page Top

23:47 Cheaderhead
23:44 Captain America
23:43 AJackson
23:43 ed
23:42 ed
23:39 OldSpook
23:37 IT Insider
23:35 Bomb-a-rama
23:35 Jan
23:35 ed
23:28 Jan
23:28 Tony
23:26 Bomb-a-rama
23:22 Alaska Paul
23:08 Alaska Paul
22:59 JosephMendiola
22:45 Phil Fraering
22:36 DanNY
22:34 Rafael
22:20 JosephMendiola
22:14 AJackson
22:11 Alaska Paul
22:08 Alaska Paul
22:00 JosephMendiola