Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 02/27/2005 View Sat 02/26/2005 View Fri 02/25/2005 View Thu 02/24/2005 View Wed 02/23/2005 View Tue 02/22/2005 View Mon 02/21/2005
1
2005-02-27 Home Front: Politix
Growing worry of prosecution among CIA
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2005-02-27 12:15:43 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Rule #1: No Witnesses.
Rule #2: This Does NOT Mean "Kill Witnesses".
Rule #3: If the military won't do it, it could probably get you in trouble.
Rule #4: Trouble is NOT your business. Your business is mission accomplishment.
Rule #5: "The bomb" will either go off or it won't. Your watching it won't help, either way.
Rule #6: Letting someone go often gets you more results than any other means.
Rule #7: The most effective interrogators provide coffee and cigarettes.
Rule #8: "Nobody ever looks for a body in a cemetery."
Rule #9: "Never bring a knife to a gunfight."
Rule #10: When in doubt, go. It was there before you arrived, it will probably be there after you leave.
Posted by Anonymoose 2005-02-27 10:24:52 AM||   2005-02-27 10:24:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Excellent! Those are 10 rules that can be used in any police department and 7 can be applied to any corporate situation.
Posted by Shipman 2005-02-27 4:25:21 PM||   2005-02-27 4:25:21 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 This is the crux of the problem for Ops and it always has been:

How do we take the bad guys out without becoming the bad guys ourselves?

Sometimes the "bad guy" methods are the only ones that work due to cultural issues - but after the first break, the others fall in line.

Sometimes urgency demands expedient methods. Problem is EVERYTHING becomes urgent to people up the food chain, if you use "field expedients" and they seem effective.

WHat most people seem to never know or figure out is that the effectiveness of the "expedient" methods drops rapidly, and you are stuck with no real recourse. That is, "bad-cop:bad-cop" only works for a while, and only if there was a "good-cop" somewhere along the way as a contrast.

Put more simply:

All stick and no carrot will eventually cause Ivan/Abdul/Pedro/Chiang to callous up and go silent in resignation, or else just start talking his head off telling you whatever he thinks you want to hear, regardless of the truth.

Either way you've blown a source because absent corroboration, you have no idea if anything he says is worth knowing.

I don't envy Porter Goss his job - hell its tough enough just carrying out policy, much less formulating it, in this kind of a flip-flop black-white world.
Posted by OldSpook 2005-02-27 7:28:09 PM||   2005-02-27 7:28:09 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 This is the crux of the problem for Ops and it always has been:

How do we take the bad guys out without becoming the bad guys ourselves?

Sometimes the "bad guy" methods are the only ones that work due to cultural issues - but after the first break, the others fall in line.

Sometimes urgency demands expedient methods. Problem is EVERYTHING becomes urgent to people up the food chain, if you use "field expedients" and they seem effective.

WHat most people seem to never know or figure out is that the effectiveness of the "expedient" methods drops rapidly, and you are stuck with no real recourse. That is, "bad-cop:bad-cop" only works for a while, and only if there was a "good-cop" somewhere along the way as a contrast.

Put more simply:

All stick and no carrot will eventually cause Ivan/Abdul/Pedro/Chiang to callous up and go silent in resignation, or else just start talking his head off telling you whatever he thinks you want to hear, regardless of the truth.

Either way you've blown a source because absent corroboration, you have no idea if anything he says is worth knowing.

I don't envy Porter Goss his job - hell its tough enough just carrying out policy, much less formulating it, in this kind of a flip-flop black-white world.
Posted by OldSpook 2005-02-27 7:28:09 PM||   2005-02-27 7:28:09 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by OldSpook 2005-02-27 7:28:09 PM||   2005-02-27 7:28:09 PM|| Front Page Top

15:59 Shipman
15:59 Shipman
15:58 Shipman
15:58 Shipman
00:20 Alaska Paul
23:47 Alaska Paul
23:47 Sobiesky
23:43 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:42 .com
23:41 GK
23:35 Sobiesky
23:35 Aris Katsaris
23:32 Alaska Paul
23:20 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:03 BH
23:01 3dc
22:59 Valentine
22:52 3dc
22:43 BH
22:42 Lone Ranger
22:40 Bomb-a-rama
22:36 BH
22:30 Rex Rufus
22:30 Pappy









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com