Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 12/19/2004 View Sat 12/18/2004 View Fri 12/17/2004 View Thu 12/16/2004 View Wed 12/15/2004 View Tue 12/14/2004 View Mon 12/13/2004
1
2004-12-19 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Adulteress faces noose or stoning in Iran
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2004-12-19 1:03:22 AM|| || Front Page|| [6 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 The world should be outraged. But it's not. This is the religion of peace. No better eaxpmle can exists for the absolute seperation of church and state. Anyone who claims islam is trustworthy has feces for brains.

We are too trust these same people to not use nuclear weapons if they should obtain them? Right. Europe get you head out of your ass.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2004-12-19 2:27:55 AM|| [http://www.slhess.com]  2004-12-19 2:27:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 We are too trust these same people to not use nuclear weapons if they should obtain them?
I am not sure who you are referring to here, the Iranian mullahs or AQ extremists. AQ loose cannons-yes, definitely they'd use nuclear weapons, in a heartbeat, but not likely directed at Europe. Why for? They gaining control through immigration and birth rates. Europe is their future state.

As for Iranian mullahs, no, IMO. The mullahs are quite happy to be powerful and in control of a potentially very rich nation to feather their own secret Swiss bank accounts. The mullahs just want the nukes as a defensive deterrrent to US regime change ideas. It strikes me that the mullahs are similar to the weasel running N.K. - evil and power hungry but not committed to having their own faces blown off in a retalitory nuke strike from the West. But Islamic nation states are a concern because extremist individuals like AQ members, who hang out in places like Iran and Pakistan, could manage to get their hands on the nukes stored in those nations.
Posted by joeblow 2004-12-19 7:46:32 AM||   2004-12-19 7:46:32 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 We must respect their culture. One man's stoning is another man's freedom fighter.
Posted by Klu Less 2004-12-19 8:06:02 AM||   2004-12-19 8:06:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 This people won't listen Klu.
Posted by Jen Tile 2004-12-19 11:52:35 AM||   2004-12-19 11:52:35 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Stoning in it's traditional sense was used to share the death of the victim with an entire village. It went something like this.

The victim was staked to the ground and a sturdy, but not to heavy board was placed on them. Each villager, in turn, would pick up a hand-sized stone and place it on the board, as the weight increased in small increments, the person was slowly crushed to death.

Makes one part of the total justice system. No abstensions allowed!
Posted by Whuling Sneth6118 2004-12-19 2:34:37 PM||   2004-12-19 2:34:37 PM|| Front Page Top

23:49 Phil Fraering
23:47 Phil Fraering
23:36 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:28 RWV
23:25 RWV
23:17 RWV
22:59 Mike Sylwester
22:47 Mike Sylwester
22:45 Capt America
22:44 Sock Puppet of Doom
22:38 Capt America
22:34 Robert Crawford
22:20 Sock Puppet of Doom
22:18 Wuzzalib
22:17 Bulldog
22:06 Alaska Paul
22:03 Alaska Paul
21:59 Ol_Dirty_American
21:55 Poison Reverse
21:33 2b
21:21 Mike Sylwester
21:13 Mike Sylwester
21:11 gromky
21:06 gromky









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com