Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 11/07/2004 View Sat 11/06/2004 View Fri 11/05/2004 View Thu 11/04/2004 View Wed 11/03/2004 View Tue 11/02/2004 View Mon 11/01/2004
1
2004-11-07 Home Front: Politix
Revolt of the Jacksonians
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2004-11-07 17:19|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Unless Pinkerton was adopted, he is of Scotch-Irish descent. That being said, I don't understand his pseudo-intellectual disdain for the Scotch-Irish. This article is the sort of thing that a professor puts out to curry favor with fellow academics by inflating their sense of intellectual and moral superiority. If he were true to his roots, he would know that most "Jacksonians" were not the target audience for and would be decidedly uncomfortable with "Team America". The people that I grew up with would dismiss him as a pompous a**hole and ignore him.
Posted by RWV 2004-11-07 5:47:17 PM||   2004-11-07 5:47:17 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 and they don't look LEFT ...

that's the Federal Reserve asking for some payback
Posted by MississippiMud 2004-11-07 6:48:55 PM||   2004-11-07 6:48:55 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Bleah. Another out-of-touch NY elitist telling us what we are and what we believe.
Posted by AzCat 2004-11-07 6:52:24 PM||   2004-11-07 6:52:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Unless Pinkerton was adopted, he is of Scotch-Irish descent. That being said, I don't understand his pseudo-intellectual disdain for the Scotch-Irish...If he were true to his roots...

Identity politics is a load of crap when blacks and Hispanics practise it, and it's a load of crap when whites do it, too.
Posted by Angie Schultz 2004-11-07 8:43:19 PM|| [http://darkblogules.blogspot.com]  2004-11-07 8:43:19 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Rule #1 when trying to establish or butress an argument, cite more than one source. Your own publication doesn't count as a second one. Mr. Pinkerton blew it .

Aside from the Yankee condescension (and a fetish about repeatedly saying 'F*ck'), there's plenty of blanket assertions here. Though he correctly termed it a "matter of honor", the Swift Vets were not so much pro-Bush as they were anti-Kerry. Also, the assertation that "some Jacksonians in California were among the 60 percent of Golden Staters who supported Proposition 71" is like saying there were Marxists in San Diego County who voted against Prop. 66 (repeal of the three-strikes law).

His fore-seeing a split between Jacksonians and libertarians is a no-brainer in any case. The latter would've voted for Kerry (or a Chilean bass) had he said "I've changed since 9/11".

Congratulations, Mr. Pinkerton. You can pick up your 'pompous windbag' plaque at the door.
Posted by Pappy 2004-11-07 9:18:49 PM||   2004-11-07 9:18:49 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 His fore-seeing a split between Jacksonians and libertarians is a no-brainer in any case. The latter would've voted for Kerry (or a Chilean bass) had he said "I've changed since 9/11".

IMHO, a lot of the Jacksonian impulse is libertarian. The "live and let live, but if you screw with me you die" philosophy is the heart of small-l libertarian. It's only the big-L Libertarians who turned it into a purer-than-thou game who insist on a split between classic American life and their ideals.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2004-11-07 10:08:38 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com]  2004-11-07 10:08:38 PM|| Front Page Top

00:50 Mike Kozlowski
00:04 Zenster
23:52 mom
23:35 Zhang Fei
23:29 Alaska Paul
23:21 BigEd
23:19 Fred
23:16 Strategic Armchair Command
23:16 BigEd
23:10 Rafael
23:08 AzCat
23:08 Rafael
23:04 Zhang Fei
22:56 Robert Crawford
22:55 Beau
22:54 Robert Crawford
22:54 Zhang Fei
22:41 Beau
22:41 Onionman
22:40 A Jackson
22:32 Barbara Skolaut
22:21 rkb
22:19 Rafael
22:17 Robert Crawford









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com