Article

2004-08-02 China-Japan-Koreas

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Chuck Simmins 2004-08-02 2:46:57 PM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 China just needs to get Halliburton connected to this somehow and then we'll have lefties swinging from the rafters demanding that the US send aid.

Posted by Laurence of the Rats 2004-08-02 3:06:50 PM|| [http://www.punictreachery.com/] 2004-08-02 3:06:50 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Rupert Wingfield Hayes is one of the BBC's pet morons. His reporting on Afghanistan was just some of the most moronic crap I have ever seen, ripe with the generalizations necessary for "reporters" who are too scared, lazy or appreciative of creature comforts to go to the front lines. I doubt his China reporting is any better - note the graphic accompanying the article on the supposed link between global warming and industry (when the actual cause is the sun getter hotter). Anything the BBC reports that has anything to do with the environment should be taken with buckets of salt.

Posted by Zhang Fei 2004-08-02 3:13:49 PM|| 2004-08-02 3:13:49 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 They should have the North Koreans draft an appropriate triumphal press release for them, quickly before somebody notices that anti-imperialist non-capitalists are bad for the enviroment.

Posted by Super Hose 2004-08-02 4:56:11 PM|| 2004-08-02 4:56:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Thank you, Zhang Fei, for the background on this particular journalistic cretin. Wingfield-Hayes is the one who wrote the ~~drivel~~ glowing article titled "On Chinaâs fast-track to luxury" that I posted yesterday.

He consistently fails to mention any downside of the massively top-heavy Chinese regime while spouting all sorts of positivistic twaddle, even when it is directly contradicted by common knowledge or outright facts.

This idjit needs some intensive clue-bat therapy.

Posted by Zenster 2004-08-02 5:37:28 PM|| 2004-08-02 5:37:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Sounds like an efficient use of resources. What good is having the Yellow River reach the ocean? It then becomes unusable. Might as well use it up before it gets there.

Posted by Anonymous5974 2004-08-02 7:04:11 PM|| 2004-08-02 7:04:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 "The Origin of the Yellow River" by I.P. Daily.

An oldie but a goodie.

Posted by Tibor 2004-08-02 9:50:38 PM|| 2004-08-02 9:50:38 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Isn't this the river that flooded like a mother a last year and burst through its banks and levys? Could that be part of why it isn't flowing to the ocean: it is busy making lakes?

Next we'll hear about how the Yangtze is Drying up while they fill the resevoir behind the ~~Fuck You Econazis~~ Three Gorges Dam.

Schmucks the lot of them.

Posted by Brutus 2004-08-02 10:19:56 PM|| 2004-08-02 10:19:56 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 more research. I'll bet that this guy is all pissed
off at the Xiaolangdi Multipurpose Dam Project
which is part of a flood control/power generation
plan for the Yellow River. Mayhap they're filling it up, too?

Fortunately, Green power in China probably means stoking the furnaces *with* greens.

Posted by Brutus 2004-08-02 10:37:24 PM|| 2004-08-02 10:37:24 PM|| Front Page Top

03:26 FlameBait93268
03:16 Anonymous6006
14:26 john
11:13 BigEd
09:26 .com
00:33 gromky
00:27 Ol_Dirty_American
00:25 Anonymous5977
00:17 Ol_Dirty_American
00:01 Seafarious
00:00 Zenster
23:58 CrazyFool
23:51 Seafarious
23:48 Oldspook
23:46 Frank G
23:46 CrazyFool
23:42 Ol_Dirty_American
23:37 CrazyFool
23:36 Ol_Dirty_American
23:09 GreatestJeneration
23:06 Lucky
22:53 Mike Sylwester
22:49 Mike Sylwester
22:37 Brutus