Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 03/28/2004 View Sat 03/27/2004 View Fri 03/26/2004 View Thu 03/25/2004 View Wed 03/24/2004 View Tue 03/23/2004 View Mon 03/22/2004
1
2004-03-28 Home Front: Culture Wars
Lousiana police can now search without warrants
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dar 2004-03-28 4:40:37 PM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Firing Up the Signle 'O Justuce Rite Now

Squire Cingold! Squire Cingoldd!

BTW it all swings on particularly and what it is.
Posted by Shipman 2004-03-28 5:34:56 PM||   2004-03-28 5:34:56 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Fred, you saved me the trouble of digging out Amendment IV. Someone suggested a while back that instead of Iraq going to all the trouble of writing a new constitution they should just take ours - - we're not using it anyway.
Posted by GK 2004-03-28 5:44:50 PM||   2004-03-28 5:44:50 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 This looks like a Circuit Court decision just waiting for the Supreme Court to crush it. The Search and Seizure laws of the United States are very well developed, and don't need to be tinkered with. Safety searches have always been permitted, but the officer has to have had probable cause in the first place to get into a situation that requires a safety search. To be able to comment more meaningfully, I'd have to read the actual decision (which sounds like work on a weekend), but the decision seems pretty stupid on the face of it.
Posted by cingold 2004-03-28 7:58:41 PM||   2004-03-28 7:58:41 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Ahhhhhh! cingold's stuck in the sink trap! Get him out! Somebody . . . get him OUT!!! A troll he is not. What he meant to post was:

"This looks like a Circuit Court decision just waiting for the Supreme Court to crush it. The Search and Seizure laws of the United States are very well developed, and don't need to be tinkered with. Safety searches have always been permitted, but the officer has to have had probable cause in the first place to get into a situation that requires a safety search. To be able to comment more meaningfully, I'd have to read the actual decision (which sounds like work on a weekend), but the decision seems pretty stupid on the face of it."

You owe me one, cingold!
Posted by ex-lib 2004-03-28 8:14:53 PM||   2004-03-28 8:14:53 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 I told you not to play in the sink trap. It's all scuzzy and dirty. Now go take a shower!
Posted by Fred  2004-03-28 8:46:53 PM||   2004-03-28 8:46:53 PM|| Front Page Top

00:00 John Doe
00:00 John Doe
00:00 John Doe
00:00 John Doe
22:40 John Doe
22:40 John Doe
00:00 Anonymous3402
00:00 John Doe
00:00 Anonymous3402
00:00 Anonymous3402
18:11 John Doe
18:11 John Doe
18:10 Anonymous
18:10 Anonymous
00:00 Anonymous3402
00:00 Anonymous
00:00 Anonymous
17:55 Anonymous
17:55 Anonymous
00:00 Anonymous3402
17:48 Anonymous3401
17:48 Anonymous3401
00:00 Anonymous
00:00 Anonymous









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com