Article

2004-01-17 Britain

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred Pruitt 2004-01-17 00:13|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Kilroy-Silk had swiftly apologised for any offence the article might have caused, claiming it had been re-published in error and had prompted no reaction when it first appeared in April last year.

What the hell for? Since when is the Arabic world and Islam beyond criticism?

"Presenters of this kind of programme have a responsibility to uphold the BBC's impartiality," Jana Bennett, the BBC's director of television. said.

The BBC's "impartiality"??? ....ha....haha....hahahaa.....hahahahaaa.....HAAAHHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!!!!

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-1-17 12:36:22 AM|| 2004-1-17 12:36:22 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 The BBC's subsidy needs to be removed ASAP. Lack of accountability is their number one enabler

Posted by Frank G 2004-1-17 11:35:10 AM|| 2004-1-17 11:35:10 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 When you can do whatever you wish without being afraid of any backlash, you have no reason to provide a "balanced" point of view. The Left has been exceedingly diligent at seizing the lines of communication. In a free market, their particular bias results in loss of viewership/listeners/readers, and the loss of advertising funds to keep them going. When the government picks up the tab, the gap between what the audience believes and feels and what the production staff believes and feels widens until the gulf cannot be crossed. The BBC is the British version - in this country NPR and PBS occupy the same position. There are plenty of alternatives to current government propaganda. It's time to pull the plug on all of them.

Posted by Old Patriot 2004-1-17 12:47:57 PM|| [http://users.codenet.net/mweather/default.htm] 2004-1-17 12:47:57 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 The BBC is not government propaganda. It is far worse, it is a tribune for the journalists. There is some legitimacy in an elected government having access to a media and to not depend on the humors of TV or journal owners to esxplain its policy. Of course some lines have to be drawn in order that the opposition has some access to it and in order that the media remains the voice of the state and not the voice of the ruling party.

In case of BBC and France's public broadcast the journalists are "independent". But indcependency does not mean veracity: they have become a tribune for the rants and propaganda of loonie left journalists, a tax-payer funded tribune for unelected journalists. Another point is that people keep their shields up when the media is being advertised as "voice of government" and to lower them when it is "made by independent journalists".

Problem is not BBC being state owned but journalists who act like activists for a cause instead ofmerley informing the public and letting it to form its opinion. AFAIK you have the same problem of distortuion of news in private media like CNN.

The fundamental issue is that the voice of a journalist reaches much farther than the voice of other people and that they abuse this power. In France more and more we are seing politicains fearing to displease them more than they fear to displease the people.

We need a counterweight to the journalistic power and that power is blogging: journalism made by the people. By real people, those who are in the productive sphere not by litterary types (see Den Beste's discussion on the psychology of the soft science people).

Posted by JFM 2004-1-17 1:39:10 PM|| 2004-1-17 1:39:10 PM|| Front Page Top

07:50 Jochen
01:48 Anti-aggressor
05:29 f-ing euro
02:24 SH
02:23 Anonymous
20:56 Jesus
18:24 Sn
17:50 Seppo Basher
16:37 Sven
15:55 Sophist
14:05 ar
14:01 ar
14:00 ar
12:28 Sven
12:27 Taffy
10:14 rt
09:18 Jochen
07:28 f-ing euro
07:23 Anonymous
06:46 f-ing euro
00:27 VRWconspiracy
23:45 curtis kreutzberg
23:41 SON OF TOLUI
23:34 SON OF TOLUI