Article

2003-11-15 Korea

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Damn_Proud_American 2003-11-15 12:20:31 AM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 "Written security guarantee" == "non-aggression pact"

Posted by Robert Crawford 2003-11-15 12:27:50 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com] 2003-11-15 12:27:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 But Kimmie doesn't want a non-aggression pact. He wants South Korea (for starters...). The non-aggression pact is just to get us out of there so he can take it.

Posted by Damn_Proud_American 2003-11-15 12:29:45 AM|| 2003-11-15 12:29:45 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 OMG! I just suffered a time warp... is Clinton president?

Didn't we do something like this once before?

Posted by CrazyFool 2003-11-15 12:30:08 AM|| 2003-11-15 12:30:08 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Same song, different verse. He probably got those half-meter resolution pics of his little enrichment plants, not to mention his private bordello.

Amazing what a little fortitude and a no-bullshit attitude will get you. Too bad we'll be spending YEARS cleaning up Clinton, Albright, and Christopher messes.

Posted by misunderestimate 2003-11-15 12:54:45 AM|| 2003-11-15 12:54:45 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Tell the Norks they're nice, but we're washing our hair for the next year or so.

But they can still call.

Posted by Shipman 2003-11-15 8:32:43 AM|| 2003-11-15 8:32:43 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 He probably just realized that it's hard to be king if all your subjects have starved to death.

They should just promise him some pills to make him taller.

Posted by Rawsnacks 2003-11-15 9:08:22 AM|| 2003-11-15 9:08:22 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Tell him we'll need extra time to think about his proposal. reschedule the talks for next April. Make it a cold and hungry winter for him.

Posted by Super Hose 2003-11-15 10:36:06 AM|| 2003-11-15 10:36:06 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Tell him we'll need extra time to think about his proposal. reschedule the talks for next April. Make it a cold and hungry winter for him.

Posted by Super Hose 2003-11-15 10:37:05 AM|| 2003-11-15 10:37:05 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 It is all up to the ChiComs and also the SoKors if they want to keep supplying Kimmie, and thus enable the continuation of the Kimmie regime. The Chicoms should write Kimmie off as a bad ~~dream~~ investment and go on. Is the PLA faction keeping Kimmie going as an ideological trip? The whole thing does not make sense, especially with the possibility or maybe reality of a nuclear armed Japan. The Chicoms have alot to lose if we have a Nork induced sea of fireâ¢.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2003-11-15 1:24:23 PM|| 2003-11-15 1:24:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 AP - especially depending on which way the wind is drifting lol... IF SK decides to pony up more funds, food, etc to keep NK going this winter we should unilaterally pull out.

Posted by Frank G 2003-11-15 3:11:53 PM|| 2003-11-15 3:11:53 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 Right Friggin On, Frank. If S Korea is going to prop them up, then we have Sorks! Both Koreas need to realize action and consequences.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2003-11-15 11:13:33 PM|| 2003-11-15 11:13:33 PM|| Front Page Top

00:32 NotMikeMoore
07:24 B
06:26 B
03:54 Edog
03:42 Edog
02:54 Jennie Taliaferro
01:28 Anonymous
00:03 eLarson
23:34 RMcLeod
23:13 Alaska Paul
23:04 Alaska Paul
22:15 Steve White
21:55 RMcLeod
21:45 Frank G
21:38 manyoso
21:33 Pro Life
21:26 Raj
21:12 Raj
20:51 Dishman
20:35 Charles
20:32 Rafael
20:28 Charles
20:26 Charles
20:04 Aris Katsaris