Article

2003-10-01 Afghanistan

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2003-10-01 12:46:34 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 France may be able to provide most of the troops?

Have we given up?

Posted by wills 2003-10-1 12:59:48 AM|| 2003-10-1 12:59:48 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 "They fear another recruitment drive for the force could reveal more weaknesses."

Err - good? Finding problems and fixing them is a good thing right?

Posted by flash91 2003-10-1 1:34:44 AM|| 2003-10-1 1:34:44 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 I see comments from or about all the Nato countries but Norway and Denmark. Why are they being excluded? Spain has troops in Iraq. Why doesn't Portugal deploy a couple of companies to Afghanistan?
The problem isn't people, it's warriors. None of the NATO countries have many warriors. There's a big difference between someone in uniform and someone capable of fighting in a 'hot' war, as we've found out from some of our Reserve and Guard batallions.

Posted by Old Patriot 2003-10-1 10:26:44 AM|| [http://users.codenet.net/mweather/default.htm] 2003-10-1 10:26:44 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 "There's a big difference between someone in uniform and someone capable of fighting in a 'hot' war, as we've found out from some of our Reserve and Guard batallions."

Hasn't that difference usually been at the NCO level. Normally, when the US goes to a "hot war" footing, it has to relieve a bunch of guys at flag rank that can't make appropriate decisions, but that wouldn't necessarily apply in a coalition where the Staff level is covered by the Brits, French and Germans.

Are Norway, Denmark and Portugal capable at the NCO rank? The qualities that I think make an excellent NCO are: experience, intiative leadership capability, guts, motivation, and the ability to think creatively under fire. I don't know why there would be much difference in the martial capability of NCO's in the Danish forces with respect to Belgium.

Posted by Superhose 2003-10-1 12:26:25 PM|| 2003-10-1 12:26:25 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 There is a good EU quiz on the BBC site.

Posted by Superhose 2003-10-1 3:13:00 PM|| 2003-10-1 3:13:00 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 The French have taken a lead role in training the new Afgan Army?

We're doomed.

On a more serious note, does anyone know if the Frenchies in Afganistan are the Legion? I would not be suprised.

Posted by Michael 2003-10-1 4:59:03 PM|| 2003-10-1 4:59:03 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Well, I've worked with Belgians, French, Netherlanders, Germans, Italians, Portuguese, Norweigans and Danes at one point or another in my miltiary career. Ranked in order of proficiency and how they'd handle a wartime situation, I'd list them as Norewigans, Danes, Germans, Netherlanders, Italians, Portuguese, Belgian, and French. The Norweigan NCOs are usually in their mid to late 30's, have 20 years experience, and know their stuff. Their armament is a bit light for desert fighting, and their uniforms are too heavy. The Italians can take the heat, but lack a real tank threat. They're great on perimeter defense. The Danes are primarily a mobile force, as one would expect for a nation that's flat, easily over-run with tanks, but which has some surprises for an invading army. The French have some good NCOs, but they're not used to taking orders from anyone but their own inadequate officers.

Anyone from any of the normal NATO countries will have to spend at least two or three months getting up to speed before they can pull their own weight. Half of that time is going to be getting used to new equipment, new tactics, and working with other military services. NATO tactics, what NATO has been practicing since its inception, are totally worthless in the Middle East. The same problem is present with the new NATO partners, but they're at least willing to learn. I have my doubts about at least 75% of the OLD NATO meeting these modern demands.

Posted by Old Patriot 2003-10-1 5:05:11 PM|| [http://users.codenet.net/mweather/default.htm] 2003-10-1 5:05:11 PM|| Front Page Top

02:49 Anonymous
00:32 Old Patriot
23:50 True German Ally
23:40 Old Patriot
23:30 Rex Mundi
23:26 Rex Mundi
23:12 Jabba the Nutt
23:04 logiccop
22:59 Super Hose
22:47 Super Hose
22:40 mojo
22:38 spiffo
22:28 Super Hose
22:22 Super Hose
22:16 Super Hose
22:14 Dishman
21:51 Atomic Conspiracy
21:39 Atomic Conspiracy
21:33 Atomic Conspiracy
21:23 eLarson
21:21 Anonymous
21:20 Anonymous
21:17 Phil_B
21:15 Dar